Overview
Title
To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to remove the exclusion of certain small business concerns from the disadvantaged business enterprise program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to change the rules so small businesses can have a fair chance to help build things like roads and bridges. It tries to fix some problems that make it hard for some small businesses to join and work on these projects.
Summary AI
H.R. 6820, titled the “Small Business Contracting Fairness Act,” aims to amend the existing Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The bill seeks to eliminate certain exclusions that prevent small business concerns from participating in the disadvantaged business enterprise program. It was introduced by Mr. Johnson of Georgia and referred to the relevant committees in the House for further consideration. The proposed changes are intended to enhance fairness in contracting opportunities for small businesses.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, H.R. 6820, aims to amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, specifically targeting the disadvantaged business enterprise program. The bill, introduced by Mr. Johnson of Georgia and co-sponsored by several others, seeks to redefine what constitutes a "small business concern" within the context of this program.
General Summary
The legislation, titled the “Small Business Contracting Fairness Act,” proposes an update to the definition of "small business concern" to align with the language used in the Small Business Act. By modifying Section 11101(e)(2)(A) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, it seeks to remove certain exclusions that previously prevented some small businesses from participating in the disadvantaged business enterprise program.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is its lack of clarity on the practical implications of the updated definition. While it intends to make the program more inclusive, it does not specify which businesses are impacted by this change. This could result in confusion regarding eligibility, potentially affecting the consistency with which the program is applied across different jurisdictions.
Moreover, the bill does not outline a detailed plan for implementation, monitoring, or enforcement of these changes. The absence of such critical information might lead to challenges in ensuring that the amending act achieves its intended objectives without unintended negative consequences.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill represents an effort to make federal contracting opportunities more accessible to a wider array of small businesses. If successful, this could enhance economic opportunities for small business owners who have been excluded previously, possibly leading to greater economic inclusivity and growth. It also indicates a move towards more equitable access to government contracts, which could foster increased competition and innovation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For small businesses currently excluded from the disadvantaged business enterprise program, this bill could open up new avenues for growth and development. However, without a clear understanding of which businesses are newly eligible, it's uncertain exactly how widespread these benefits might be.
Business owners in regions or industries that previously faced barriers to entry could find newfound opportunities, potentially leveling the playing field. Nonetheless, the absence of explicit implementation guidelines raises concerns about the equitable distribution of these opportunities.
Conversely, if not carefully managed, the bill's provisions could unintentionally favor certain businesses over others, potentially leading to regional or sector-specific disparities. The lack of detail about the criteria and processes by which businesses will be assessed might also lead to inconsistent application, leaving some businesses at a disadvantage.
In conclusion, while the intention behind H.R. 6820 is to enhance fairness in small business contracting within federal programs, the execution and potential impacts require careful consideration to ensure that the bill's objectives align with broader socio-economic goals and equity.
Issues
The amendment to the definition of 'small business concern' does not clarify the specific impact on which businesses are now included or excluded, raising concerns about fairness and the potential for favoring certain businesses over others. This issue is relevant to Section 2.
The updated definition in Section 2 lacks detail about how it will affect businesses' eligibility for the disadvantaged business enterprise program, potentially leading to confusion and inconsistent application across different jurisdictions.
The bill's purpose to remove exclusionary criteria for small businesses in the disadvantaged business enterprise program is not clearly outlined, making it difficult to assess its potential effectiveness or the consequences for the businesses it aims to support, as noted in Sections 1 and 2.
The bill does not provide information on how the changes will be implemented, monitored, or enforced, which is crucial for ensuring that the intended benefits are realized and that the changes do not inadvertently disadvantage certain groups or regions, relevant to Section 2.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act establishes its short title, stating that it can be referred to as the “Small Business Contracting Fairness Act”.
2. Disadvantaged business enterprises Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to clarify that the term "small business concern" refers to the definition used in the Small Business Act.