Overview

Title

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to designate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants the government to say that some bad chemicals, called PFAS, are dangerous and take steps to clean them up, keep them out of our water, and teach people about them. It also gives money to help fix water that has these chemicals and to make sure schools have safe drinking water.

Summary AI

H.R. 6805, known as the "PFAS Action Act of 2023," requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to classify certain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as hazardous under environmental law. The bill outlines steps for testing and regulatory action regarding PFAS, including new rules for drinking water standards and creating grants for PFAS-related infrastructure improvements. It also mandates the EPA to develop information resources to help the public understand and manage risks associated with PFAS. Additionally, the bill prohibits unsafe waste incineration of PFAS and promotes the labeling of PFAS-free products.

Published

2023-12-14
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2023-12-14
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6805ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
19
Words:
8,096
Pages:
43
Sentences:
159

Language

Nouns: 2,426
Verbs: 513
Adjectives: 574
Adverbs: 83
Numbers: 321
Entities: 341

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.63
Average Sentence Length:
50.92
Token Entropy:
5.46
Readability (ARI):
29.31

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the "PFAS Action Act of 2023" (H. R. 6805), seeks to address the environmental and health challenges posed by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) by introducing various regulatory, testing, and funding measures. PFAS are a group of man-made chemicals widely used in consumer products, industrial processes, and firefighting foams that have been linked to adverse health effects. The bill directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to designate PFAS as hazardous substances, conduct rigorous testing, and implement drinking water regulations. It also establishes grant programs to assist communities, particularly disadvantaged ones, in reducing PFAS contamination in their water systems and provides for labeling products as PFAS-free.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the key issues highlighted is the lack of specific funding allocations or budgets across several sections of the bill, notably Sections 2, 6, and 12. Without clear financial support, the comprehensive implementation of the bill’s provisions could be challenging, limiting its potential effectiveness. Moreover, technical language prevalent throughout the bill might complicate public comprehension, hindering stakeholder engagement and compliance, particularly in Sections 3, 4, and 6.

Another concern is the absence of detailed criteria and guidelines for prioritizing cleanup and testing efforts, as pointed out in Sections 2 and 8. This lack of specificity could lead to inconsistencies and inefficiencies, undermining public trust and possibly affecting environmental outcomes. Additionally, the timelines for regulatory actions in Sections 2 and 12 extend up to five years, potentially delaying vital protective measures and raising ethical concerns regarding public health safety.

The bill’s attempts to enforce compliance are weakened by the lack of clear penalties or enforcement mechanisms, especially in Sections 13 and 14, which may diminish its deterrence capabilities and leave room for ongoing PFAS pollution. Further, the absence of a comprehensive strategy for grant eligibility and fund allocation, as noted in Sections 7, 8, and 9, could result in misallocation of resources, leading to inequitable distribution of benefits, particularly for communities most in need.

Potential Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the bill aims to enhance public health and environmental protection by controlling and reducing PFAS contamination. If effectively implemented, it could safeguard drinking water quality and ensure that communities are better informed about PFAS-related risks. Explicit drinking water regulations and testing requirements could lead to significant reductions in PFAS levels in water supplies, potentially improving public health outcomes over time.

For specific stakeholders, the impact of the bill could be mixed. Communities with significant PFAS contamination stand to benefit from financial assistance through grants, helping to cover the costs of treatment technologies and infrastructure improvements. However, without clearly defined criteria and equitable allocation of resources, there is a risk that some communities could be left out or receive inadequate support.

Manufacturers and industries utilizing PFAS may face additional regulations and financial burdens due to increased testing requirements and product labeling. On the positive side, the bill could stimulate innovation and the development of PFAS-free alternatives, aligning with consumer preferences for safer products. Conversely, the lack of stringent penalties for non-compliance could lead to uneven implementation and continued environmental risks.

The bill is particularly beneficial for state and local water authorities as it provides a framework for monitoring and updating drinking water regulations. Still, the absence of specified funding for compliance enforcement might leave these bodies with operational challenges.

Ultimately, while the PFAS Action Act of 2023 presents a comprehensive strategy to combat PFAS pollution, its success will largely depend on overcoming financial, operational, and regulatory hurdles to ensure thorough execution and public transparency.

Financial Assessment

The "PFAS Action Act of 2023" includes several financial allocations aimed at addressing the challenges posed by PFAS. These allocations are designed to provide the necessary resources for managing PFAS-related environmental and health concerns. Below is an analysis of the financial components within the bill:

Financial Allocations and Appropriations

The bill provides specific appropriations across various sections to support PFAS management and remediation efforts:

  • Section 8 (PFAS Infrastructure Grant Program) authorizes funding of $500 million annually from fiscal years 2024 to 2028. This funding is intended to aid community water systems affected by PFAS by covering capital costs for implementing eligible treatment technologies. Additionally, there is a provision for $25 million per year for fiscal years 2024 and 2025 to retroactively cover costs incurred for implementing such technologies between 2014 and the enactment of this section.

  • Section 9 (School Drinking Water Testing and Filtration Grant Program) allocates $100 million annually for fiscal years 2024 through 2028. This funding assists states, Indian tribes, and local educational agencies in testing for PFAS in drinking water and installing filtration systems in schools and child care facilities.

  • Section 11 (Household Well Water Testing Website) has an appropriation of $1 million for fiscal year 2024 to establish a website providing information on testing household well water.

  • Section 17 (Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards) grants $200 million annually from fiscal years 2024 through 2028 to support publicly owned treatment works in implementing PFAS-related effluent limitations guidelines and standards.

Relation to Identified Issues

The financial provisions help tackle some concerns raised in the bill's issues:

  • Underfunding Concerns: Although substantial amounts are allocated in sections 8, 9, 11, and 17, there is an observable gap in funding for sections 2, 6, and 12. This disparity could lead to underfunding for crucial actions needed to classify and regulate PFAS as hazardous substances or address air pollution implications.

  • Resource Allocation and Equity: The allocated funds aim to support disadvantaged communities and prioritize areas that need it most, addressing potential misallocations. However, the lack of a clear strategy or criteria may still result in inequitable distribution, thus underlining concerns about resource allocation and equity.

  • Enforcement and Accountability: While some funds are earmarked for specific purposes, there is little mention of how these funds ensure compliance with new regulations or penalize non-compliance, which could undermine effective implementation and enforcement.

  • Complexity and Focus: With broad financial commitments across various aspects of PFAS management, the bill attempts to cover multiple areas comprehensively, though this can dilute focus. This expansive approach might complicate the enforcement of financial accountability and consistent application of funds across different sections and agencies.

Conclusion

Overall, while the "PFAS Action Act of 2023" incorporates significant financial resources to support its mandates, the distribution and specific application of these funds reveal potential gaps and areas needing further clarity. Addressing these could enhance the effectiveness and equity of financial implementation in managing PFAS hazards.

Issues

  • The lack of specific funding allocation or budget in several sections, particularly Sections 2, 6, and 12, raises concerns about potential underfunding and the effective implementation of the provisions outlined, given the scale of action required to manage PFAS as hazardous substances in various environmental domains.

  • The potential ambiguity and complexity in technical language throughout the bill, as seen in Sections 3, 4, and 6, may hinder public understanding and limit transparency in regulatory processes, potentially affecting stakeholder engagement and compliance.

  • The absence of detailed criteria and guidelines for prioritizing cleanup and testing efforts, as highlighted in Sections 2 and 8, could lead to inefficiencies and inconsistencies, impacting public trust and environmental outcomes.

  • The potentially lengthy timelines for regulatory actions, as seen in Sections 2 and 12 (up to 5 years for further PFAS determinations), can delay necessary protective measures against environmental and health risks posed by PFAS, raising ethical concerns.

  • The lack of enforcement mechanisms or clarity on penalties for non-compliance, notably in Sections 13 and 14, may undermine the effectiveness of the law, reducing its deterrence capability and leaving room for continued PFAS pollution.

  • The absence of a comprehensive strategy or criteria for grant eligibility and fund allocation, as seen in Sections 7, 8, and 9, could lead to misallocation of resources and inequitable distribution of benefits, potentially disadvantaging communities that are most in need.

  • The broad discretion granted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in terms of decision-making without clear accountability checks, as seen in Sections 4 and 16, could lead to potential bias or unequal application of policies, affecting public confidence in the EPA's role.

  • The limited definition and potential misinterpretation of terms such as 'disproportionately exposed community' and 'affected community water system' in Section 8 may lead to inconsistent applications and inequities across different regions and communities.

  • The complexity and broad scope of the bill, such as amalgamating various PFAS-related issues under one legislative umbrella, may dilute focus and complicate enforcement and accountability efforts across different agencies and sectors.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The PFAS Action Act of 2023 establishes various measures to address the issue of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including their designation as hazardous substances, setting testing standards, and implementing water regulations and grant programs. The Act also focuses on prohibiting unsafe practices and labeling products to help identify PFAS-free options.

2. Designation as hazardous substances Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to label certain harmful chemicals as hazardous substances within 60 days of the act's passage and to assess whether more chemicals should be designated as hazardous within five years. Additionally, it requires the EPA to report to Congress on cleanup efforts, including site details and discrepancies between different types of contamination sites.

3. Testing of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates new rules for testing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) under the Toxic Substances Control Act. It requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to create clear protocols and deadlines for testing these chemicals, ensuring that manufacturers provide necessary information about their hazards and risks, and allows exemptions only when information is duplicate.

4. Analytical reference standards for PFAS Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Toxic Substances Control Act to require manufacturers and processors of certain chemical substances known as PFAS to submit samples or standards for these chemicals to the government. The government may use these samples for developing safety protocols and for enforcement, prioritizing substances that are highly toxic or have high production volumes.

5. Manufacturing and processing notices for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act states that most perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are excluded from certain requirements unless used for specific scientific or medical purposes. It also mandates that for the next five years, these substances are presumed to pose an unreasonable risk to health or the environment, leading to a prohibition on their manufacture, processing, and distribution.

6. National primary drinking water regulations for PFAS Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Safe Drinking Water Act to require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to create regulations for specific chemicals called perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which can be found in drinking water. It outlines the procedures for establishing these regulations, including timelines for public input and enforcement, and includes exceptions for when penalties can be imposed for non-compliance.

7. Assistance to Territories for addressing emerging contaminants, with a focus on perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has amended the Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure that at least 2% of the funds available for addressing emerging contaminants are reserved for the U.S. territories, such as the Virgin Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and Guam, with a special focus on tackling substances like perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl.

8. Establishment of PFAS infrastructure grant program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text establishes a program to provide grants for community water systems affected by PFAS (perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances) to help with the costs of implementing effective treatment technologies. The program prioritizes systems that serve disadvantaged communities, contribute cost-sharing, and demonstrate maintenance capacity, with funding authorized from 2024 through 2028.

Money References

  • — “(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $500,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028.
  • “(2) SPECIAL RULE.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by paragraph (1), $25,000,000 are authorized to be appropriated for each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for grants under subsection (a) to pay for capital costs associated with the implementation of eligible treatment technologies during the period beginning on October 1, 2014, and ending on the date of enactment of this section.

1459H. Assistance for community water systems affected by PFAS Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a program to help community water systems dealing with PFAS contamination by providing grants to cover treatment technology costs, prioritizing systems serving disadvantaged communities or those offering cost-sharing. It also defines key terms and sets a budget of $500 million annually from 2024 to 2028 for this purpose.

Money References

  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $500,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028.
  • (2) SPECIAL RULE.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by paragraph (1), $25,000,000 are authorized to be appropriated for each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for grants under subsection (a) to pay for capital costs associated with the implementation of eligible treatment technologies during the period beginning on October 1, 2014, and ending on the date of enactment of this section. (g) Definitions.—In this section: (1) AFFECTED COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEM.—The term “affected community water system” means a community water system that is affected by the presence of PFAS in the water in the community water system.

9. School drinking water testing and filtration grant program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a program for giving grants to states, Indian tribes, and nonprofit organizations to help schools and child care centers test for and reduce harmful chemicals called perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in their drinking water. It also outlines rules for applying for these grants, how the funds can be used, and requirements for making test results publicly available.

Money References

  • “(g) Authorization of appropriation.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028, to remain available until expended.”.

1466. School PFAS testing and filtration grant program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The School PFAS Testing and Filtration Grant Program requires the Administrator to establish a grant program within a year of enactment to help States, Indian Tribes, schools, and nonprofits test for harmful chemicals in drinking water and install effective filtration systems where needed. Grants are available to eligible applicants to cover the costs of testing, installing, and maintaining filtration systems, as well as safely disposing of old equipment, with specific requirements for public transparency and a limitation on using grant funds for administrative costs.

Money References

  • (g) Authorization of appropriation.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028, to remain available until expended. ---

10. Investigation of prevention of contamination by GenX Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates the Environmental Protection Agency Administrator to explore ways to prevent GenX from polluting ground and surface waters, especially those used for drinking.

11. Household well water testing website Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the establishment of a website by the Environmental Protection Agency within one year, which will provide information on testing household well water, including details on inspectors, certified laboratories, specific contaminants, treatment options, financial assistance, and health risks. The website will be accessible to those with limited English proficiency, and the agency will collaborate with other federal and state entities, with $1,000,000 authorized for funding in fiscal year 2024.

Money References

  • (e) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2024. ---

12. Listing of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances as hazardous air pollutants Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The legislation mandates that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must add specific chemicals, perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluoroactanesulfonic acid, along with their salts, to the list of hazardous air pollutants within 180 days of the act's enactment. Additionally, the EPA is required to consider adding more perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances to this list within five years and must update its list of pollution sources to include these substances within 365 days of any final rule.

13. Prohibition on unsafe waste incineration of PFAS Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The new amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal Act requires that materials containing harmful chemicals known as PFAS must be incinerated in a way that ensures these chemicals are completely eliminated while minimizing air pollution. Additionally, these materials must be safely stored before disposal, and penalties will apply if these rules are violated.

14. Label for PFAS-free products Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that within one year of the law's enactment, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency must update the Safer Choice Program to ensure products labeled "Safer Choice" do not contain PFAS, or create a voluntary label for products without PFAS. It also defines “covered product” as various household items, and “PFAS” as a certain type of chemical substance.

15. Disclosure of introductions of PFAS Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section makes it illegal for the owner or operator of an industrial facility to release any perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) into a treatment facility without first informing the facility’s owner or operator about the type and amount of the substance and whether it can be treated safely. Violating this rule is treated the same as breaking certain pollution control regulations.

16. Risk-communication strategy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency is required to create a plan to inform the public about the dangers of certain chemical substances, known as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances. This plan should include sharing information about risks in areas like land and water, educating people on how they might be exposed, and learning from states with successful communication strategies.

17. Clean Water Act effluent limitations guidelines and standards and water quality criteria for PFAS Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator to establish water quality criteria and effluent limitations for chemicals known as PFAS within certain timeframes and to provide grants for treatment facilities to comply with these standards. It also defines key terms and limits how funds can be used to prevent them from being linked to tax-exempt obligations.

Money References

  • (2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator to carry out this subsection $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028, to remain available until expended.