Overview
Title
To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to improve the assessment of expression of interest fees, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 678 wants to change some rules about how people can ask to use land for looking for oil and gas. If someone asks to use the land and no one else wants it, they have to pay a fee, but if someone else does want it and wins, that person pays the fee.
Summary AI
H. R. 678, also known as the "Expression of Interest Sensibility Act," seeks to revise the Mineral Leasing Act with a focus on how fees are assessed for expressions of interest in leasing land for oil or gas exploration. The bill stipulates that if no bid is received for land covered by an expression of interest during a lease sale, a fee will be charged to the person who first expressed interest. Conversely, if there is a successful bid, the fee will be charged to the winning bidder. Additionally, an expression of interest remains active for at least five years unless the land is offered for lease within that time.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The Expression of Interest Sensibility Act aims to amend the Mineral Leasing Act to improve how fees are assessed for expressions of interest in leasing lands for oil and gas exploration. Essentially, this bill outlines a process by which fees are implemented and collected when entities express interest in leasing federal lands for resource extraction. The fees are due at two distinct points: if the land receives no bids during a lease sale, the initial party expressing interest pays a fee; if there is a successful bid, the bidder pays the fee. Furthermore, the bill specifies that these expressions of interest will remain active for at least five years, unless the land is put up for lease in the meantime.
Significant Issues
One notable issue raised by this legislation is the decision to strike the phrase “Fee for” from the heading of the relevant section of the Mineral Leasing Act while the section still involves fee assessments. This could potentially lead to misunderstandings about the section's purpose and might require revisions for clarity.
Another concern is whether the proposed fees will sufficiently cover the administrative expenses incurred during the leasing process. If the fees are too low, the process could be financially inefficient, leading to potential wasteful spending.
The bill's language is cited as complex, which could create barriers to understanding and compliance among stakeholders interested in leasing land for resource extraction. Simplifying the language might ensure that all involved parties can clearly understand the procedures and requirements.
Lastly, the requirement for expressions of interest to remain active for a minimum of five years might lead to inefficiencies. This is particularly the case if the land does not become attractive for leasing during that period, potentially stifling other developmental opportunities and tying up resources without actual exploration or production.
Broad Public Impact
The bill might have a broad impact on the public, particularly concerning environmental considerations and the management of public lands. By altering the fee assessment process for leasing public lands, the bill could influence how federal lands are used for resource extraction. Improved clarity and efficiency in the fee structure could encourage more responsible and productive use of these lands.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For businesses within the oil and gas sectors, this legislation could bring both opportunities and challenges. Simplified processes and well-structured fees might lower the entry barriers for smaller companies, making it easier and more attractive to initiate leases. However, uncertainties about the fee assessments and the length of interest validity could deter investment if strategic leasing decisions are constrained.
For governmental bodies, particularly the Department of the Interior, administering this process effectively will be crucial. Ensuring fees adequately cover administrative costs without deterring interest might require careful calibration.
Overall, this bill appears positioned to revamp aspects of public land leasing for oil and gas exploration. However, the discussed issues suggest a need for further refinement to maximize benefits while minimizing potential inefficiencies.
Issues
The amendment to strike 'Fee for' from the heading in Section 2 may create confusion, given that the section still involves the assessment of fees. It might be more prudent to ensure that the heading accurately reflects the content, as this could help avoid misunderstandings about the purpose of the section.
The assessment of fees related to expressions of interest, as outlined in Section 2(b)(2)(A) and Section 2(b)(2)(B), raises concerns about potential wasteful spending if these fees do not adequately cover the administrative costs incurred during the process.
The complex language used to describe the submission process for expressions of interest and the assessment of fees in Section 2(b)(1) and Section 2(b)(2) could create barriers to understanding and compliance. Simplifying the language might ensure that stakeholders can more readily understand the process.
The provision in Section 2(b)(5) that an expression of interest must remain active for 'not less than 5 years' unless the land is offered at a lease sale could lead to inefficiencies if land remains unattractive for leasing during that period, unnecessarily tying up interest without operational developments.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the official short title of the bill is the "Expression of Interest Sensibility Act."
2. Fee for expression of interest Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends the Mineral Leasing Act to define and require fees for expressions of interest in leasing land for oil and gas exploration. If no bid is received for the land, the person who made the first expression of interest pays a fee, but if there is a successful bid, the fee is charged to the winning bidder. The expression of interest remains valid for at least five years unless the land is put up for lease.