Overview

Title

To require a publicly traded company to disclose to the Securities and Exchange Commission if the company has a diversity, equity, and inclusion program to combat antisemitism.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6776 is a bill that wants big companies to tell a special group called the SEC if they have special programs to stop people from being mean to Jewish people. These companies have to include this information in their yearly reports.

Summary AI

H.R. 6776, known as the "Antisemitism Inclusion in DEI Act of 2023," is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives. It requires publicly traded companies to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission whether they have diversity, equity, and inclusion programs specifically aimed at combating antisemitism. This addition to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 mandates that these disclosures be included in the annual reports filed by such companies.

Published

2023-12-13
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2023-12-13
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6776ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
255
Pages:
2
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 85
Verbs: 27
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 11
Entities: 19

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.37
Average Sentence Length:
23.18
Token Entropy:
4.37
Readability (ARI):
14.21

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill, titled the “Antisemitism Inclusion in DEI Act of 2023,” was introduced in the House of Representatives on December 13, 2023. The proposed legislation mandates that publicly traded companies disclose to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) whether they have implemented a specific diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) program aimed at combating antisemitism. This requirement would be added to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, specifically in the section concerning annual reports.

Significant Issues

There are several notable issues associated with the drafting and intent of this bill:

  1. Potential Redundancy: The bill's focus on requiring disclosures for antisemitism-specific programs might be seen as redundant. Many DEI initiatives already aim to address all forms of discrimination, including antisemitism. Introducing a separate disclosure requirement could add complexity without necessarily enhancing program effectiveness.

  2. Vague Language: The bill lacks clarity regarding what constitutes sufficient "initiative and training" in combating antisemitism. This could lead to varied and potentially inconsistent interpretations among companies regarding compliance.

  3. Absence of Penalties: The bill does not define any penalties for non-compliance with the disclosure requirement. This absence may weaken the enforcement of the mandate and potentially reduce the incentive for companies to establish such programs if they are not already in place.

  4. Focused Scope: By singling out antisemitism, the bill may inadvertently suggest a hierarchy in addressing discrimination forms, potentially de-emphasizing the broad spectrum of diversity and inclusion efforts.

Broad Public Impact

The bill's passage could lead to increased awareness and efforts to combat antisemitism within corporations. By requiring disclosures about specific DEI programs, companies might be motivated to develop or augment initiatives targeting antisemitism. However, the required compliance could impose additional administrative tasks on companies, particularly those that already engage in comprehensive DEI practices.

For shareholders and consumers, increased transparency in corporate policies could contribute to informed decision-making and potentially promote an inclusive corporate culture. However, without clear guidance and enforcement mechanisms, the real-world impact of this transparency might be limited.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Publicly Traded Companies: Companies are the primary stakeholders affected by this bill. They may face new compliance costs and administrative burdens, especially if they need to establish specific programs to meet disclosure requirements. On the other hand, companies could leverage these disclosures to highlight their commitment to combating antisemitism, potentially enhancing their reputations.

Employees: Employees might benefit indirectly from the push for more comprehensive antisemitism-focused initiatives, fostering a more inclusive workplace. However, the impact might vary depending on how effectively companies implement and communicate these initiatives.

Investors and Regulators: Investors could use disclosed information to evaluate companies' commitments to social responsibility. Regulators, meanwhile, might find the absence of enforcement mechanisms a challenge, limiting the bill's practical effect unless further regulations are developed.

Overall, while aiming to address a critical social issue, the bill requires careful consideration and potential refinements to ensure clarity, reduce administrative burdens, and ensure equitable focus across all forms of discrimination within corporate DEI programs.

Issues

  • The requirement for issuers to disclose a diversity, equity, and inclusion program specifically to combat antisemitism in Section 2 could be seen as duplicative if such programs are already designed to broadly address all forms of discrimination. This might lead to unnecessary bureaucracy and administrative burden on companies.

  • The language in Section 2 is vague as it does not specify what qualifies as an 'initiative and training' to combat antisemitism, leading to potential inconsistencies in how issuers interpret and implement this requirement.

  • Section 2 does not specify any penalties or enforcement mechanisms for non-compliance, which may reduce the effectiveness of the bill in ensuring that issuers implement the necessary programs.

  • By focusing solely on antisemitism, Section 2 might inadvertently deprioritize other forms of discrimination, potentially leading to ethical concerns about the equitable application of diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill provides its official title, which is the “Antisemitism Inclusion in DEI Act of 2023.”

2. Disclosure of diversity, equity, and inclusion program to combat antisemitism Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed amendment to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires companies that file annual reports to disclose whether they have a diversity, equity, and inclusion program specifically aimed at combating antisemitism.