Overview

Title

To authorize the establishment of a comprehensive school-based violence prevention program to assist youth at highest risk for involvement in gun violence in local communities and schools, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6754 is a plan to help keep schools safe by giving money to programs that stop violence before it starts, especially for kids who might get into trouble with guns. It gives millions of dollars each year for things like helping students who are stressed or teaching adults how to help, but some worry the money might not go to the right places.

Summary AI

H.R. 6754, known as the "School Violence Prevention Act," aims to create a comprehensive program to help prevent violence in schools, particularly focusing on students most at risk of being involved in gun violence. The bill proposes grants to establish or expand violence prevention programs, which use evidence-based and culturally appropriate methods, and foster community engagement. The programs will support initiatives such as trauma-informed care and mental health services for students, staff training, and community partnerships. A total of $25 million is authorized annually from 2024 to 2031 for these efforts, with stipulations for evaluation and reporting on the programs' outcomes.

Published

2023-12-13
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2023-12-13
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6754ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,840
Pages:
10
Sentences:
35

Language

Nouns: 532
Verbs: 147
Adjectives: 120
Adverbs: 14
Numbers: 55
Entities: 68

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.41
Average Sentence Length:
52.57
Token Entropy:
5.24
Readability (ARI):
29.01

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the “School Violence Prevention Act,” focuses on developing comprehensive prevention programs aimed at reducing gun violence among youth within schools and communities. Introduced in December 2023, this bill seeks to authorize grants to schools and related organizations to implement strategies that address violence at its roots. By targeting areas with high rates of violence, the lawmakers hope to foster safer environments for young people.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill introduces a grant program spearheaded by the Department of Education and the Department of Health. It is designed to fund local educational agencies and community-based nonprofits that work with youth most at risk of gun violence. The grants would support programs that are evidence-based and culturally competent, providing mental health support, community engagement, and trauma-informed care. Schools may form partnerships to qualify for funds and can potentially secure financial support over a period of five years, with the possibility of renewal.

Significant Issues

A primary concern is the eligibility criteria for grants, which center on specific statistics like homicide rates and youth violence incidences. This focus may inadvertently exclude some areas experiencing significant violence but not meeting the specific numerical thresholds. Additionally, the bill stipulates that up to 20% of grant funds can be used for evaluation activities, potentially diverting substantial resources from core program objectives. There are also concerns about the process for selecting independent researchers to evaluate the program's impact, as it lacks clear guidelines, leaving room for potential biases or favoritism.

The provision in the bill to allow eligibility based on "unique and compelling need" is notably vague, which could lead to inconsistent decision-making about who receives funding. Furthermore, while the bill emphasizes equitable geographical distribution, it does not provide a detailed method to ensure fair allocation across different regions.

Impact on the Public

The initiative could have a significant positive impact on reducing youth involvement in gun violence, especially in hard-hit areas. By strengthening community ties and offering mental health and emotional support, the program has the potential to create safer and more supportive environments for young people. However, if certain communities are inadvertently left out due to the specific eligibility criteria, it could lead to disparities in access to these beneficial programs.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Schools and Community Organizations: These groups stand to benefit from the additional resources provided by the bill. Schools could significantly enhance their violence prevention efforts and provide students with much-needed support services.

Youth and Families: The direct beneficiaries would be students and their families, who might experience improved safety and well-being due to more comprehensive support structures in schools and communities.

Smaller Entities or Rural Areas: There could be challenges for smaller organizations or those in rural regions to meet the grant requirements, especially regarding data disaggregation and evaluation processes, possibly limiting their ability to participate.

State and Local Governments: While state educational agencies are a critical component of the program’s infrastructure, they may face additional responsibilities in coordinating and managing these funds and programs effectively.

This bill, if effectively implemented and equitably administered, holds promise for meaningful reductions in youth violence. However, attention to the identified issues and stakeholder concerns will be crucial to maximizing its reach and impact.

Financial Assessment

H.R. 6754, titled the "School Violence Prevention Act," outlines a financial framework for addressing school-based violence, particularly focusing on youth at risk of involvement in gun violence. This commentary explores the financial aspects contained within the bill and how they relate to identified issues.

Summary of Financial Allocations

The bill authorizes an appropriation of $25 million annually from 2024 through 2031. This funding is earmarked for establishing or expanding comprehensive school-based violence prevention programs. These programs are designed to support youth through various initiatives, including trauma-informed care, mental health services, and fostering community partnerships.

Allocation of Grant Resources

A notable provision in the bill is that up to 20% of the grant funds may be used by grantees for evaluating the effectiveness of their programs. This allocation invites scrutiny because it represents a significant portion of the grant that might be diverted from direct programming to administrative functions. Consequently, while this evaluation process is crucial for assessing program impact and guiding future efforts, it could potentially reduce the overall resources available for directly assisting at-risk youth.

Funding for Independent Research

Additionally, the Secretary of Education has the discretion to reserve up to 5% of the total funds for contracting independent researchers to evaluate selected programs. While this aims to ensure an objective assessment of program effectiveness, there are concerns about potential conflicts of interest or favoritism due to the lack of a defined selection process for these researchers. The substantial funding reserved for research evaluations might detract from the immediate application of funds to direct violence prevention efforts.

Geographical Distribution and Renewal Concerns

The bill mandates an equitable geographical distribution of funds across U.S. regions; however, the absence of specific criteria for this distribution raises concerns over possible uneven resource allocation. Furthermore, the provision that grants could be renewed indefinitely for five-year periods, without reassessment of need or program effectiveness, raises the issue of long-term financial commitments that might not always align with evolving needs or evidence of efficacy.

In summary, while H.R. 6754 aims to invest significant resources into preventing school-based violence, the allocation of financial resources reflects both opportunities and challenges. An emphasis on thorough and transparent evaluation processes is essential to ensure funds are utilized effectively, balancing between program delivery and assessment, and adjusting allocations based on performance and changing community needs.

Issues

  • The eligibility criteria under Section 2, subsection (c)(1)(A) rely on specific statistics relating to homicides and violent crime rates, which may exclude areas experiencing significant violence issues that do not meet these exact thresholds. This could result in inequitable access to grants for communities in need.

  • The requirement for a grantee to disaggregate data by certain subgroups, as stated in Section 2, subsection (f)(1)(B)(ii), may necessitate additional resources and expertise, posing a challenge for smaller entities to comply effectively.

  • Subsection (b)(1)(A) of Section 2 defines the program's focus 'primarily' on youth younger than 19, creating potential ambiguity in program execution and grant application eligibility.

  • Up to 20% of grant funds may be used for evaluation activities by grantees (Section 2, subsection (f)(1)(A)), potentially diverting funds from core program activities and reducing their overall impact.

  • Section 2, subsection (f)(2) allows the Secretary to contract with independent researchers for program evaluation, raising concerns about conflicts of interest or favoritism due to the lack of a clear selection process.

  • The authorization for up to 5% of funds to be reserved for independent research evaluations (Section 2, subsection (i)(2)(B)) is a potentially significant allocation that may detract from direct program implementation.

  • Subsection (c)(1)(B) permits grant eligibility based on 'a unique and compelling need' without defined parameters, which could lead to subjective and inconsistent decision-making in grant awards.

  • The section on geographical distribution (Section 2, subsection (d)) mandates equitable fund distribution but lacks specific criteria, risking uneven resource allocation across regions.

  • The indefinite renewal of five-year grants in Section 2, subsection (e) without reassessment of need or effectiveness introduces a risk of long-term funding commitments without accountability.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it will be called the “School Violence Prevention Act.”

2. Comprehensive school-based violence prevention program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The document outlines a program where the U.S. government will give grants to schools and community organizations to prevent violence among young people, particularly in places struggling with high rates of violence. The program will provide activities like mental health support and community involvement, with a focus on areas hit hardest by violence, and they can receive funding for up to five years to help make schools safer.

Money References

  • — “(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2031.

581. Comprehensive school-based violence prevention program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section describes a program where the Secretary of Education provides grants to help schools and communities implement violence prevention programs targeting youth at risk of gun violence. These programs include trauma-informed strategies, community engagement, access to mental health services, and require regular reporting and evaluation to assess their impact.

Money References

  • (1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2031.