Overview
Title
To require a certain percentage of natural gas and crude oil exports be transported on United States-built and United States-flag vessels, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Energizing American Shipbuilding Act of 2023" is a bill that wants more natural gas and oil to be carried on ships that are made and operated by Americans, helping U.S. shipbuilders and workers while making sure some exceptions apply for certain trading partners.
Summary AI
H.R. 6724, known as the "Energizing American Shipbuilding Act of 2023," aims to boost the use of U.S.-built and U.S.-flagged vessels for exporting natural gas and crude oil. The bill sets specific percentage targets for these exports to be transported using such vessels, gradually increasing over the years. It also encourages shipbuilding and retrofitting activities to be conducted in U.S. shipyards and offers training opportunities for U.S. mariners. Exceptions are included for exports to countries with which the U.S. has free trade agreements that conflict with these requirements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "Energizing American Shipbuilding Act of 2023" seeks to regulate the transportation of natural gas and crude oil exports by mandating a percentage of these exports to be carried on vessels built or documented under the laws of the United States. This legislation aims to bolster the domestic shipbuilding industry and enhance national security by ensuring that a part of energy exports is transported on U.S.-compliant vessels. Over a span of more than two decades, the bill outlines incremental percentage requirements for the exported energy assets to be carried on such American vessels. Additionally, it emphasizes providing training opportunities for U.S. mariners and mandates the collection and dissemination of export information by the Energy Information Administration.
Significant Issues
One of the principal issues with the bill involves its potential to favor U.S. shipbuilding interests at the expense of international competition. By requiring certain percentages of exports to be transported on U.S.-documented and built vessels, the legislation could increase costs for exporters due to limited competition. The gradual increase in percentage requirements raises concerns about the capacity to meet these demands, potentially straining the existing infrastructure and supply capabilities.
Furthermore, the bill introduces waiver provisions based on specific criteria such as cost increases or unavailability of components produced domestically. However, the subjective nature of these waivers could lead to inconsistencies and delays. The complex legal language employed in the bill may pose understanding challenges, particularly for stakeholders unfamiliar with legal or technical jargon. Additionally, exceptions based on free trade agreements introduce a risk of inconsistent application of the law.
Training opportunities for U.S. mariners are encouraged by the bill, but it lacks a clear mechanism for enforcing or evaluating these opportunities, which could lead to unequal implementation. Moreover, reliance on information from private entities, when federal data is unavailable, poses potential reliability issues without established guidelines.
Public Impact
Broadly, this legislation may increase shipping costs for natural gas and crude oil exporters due to possible reliance on more expensive U.S.-built vessels. Over time, as the percentage requirements rise, this could result in higher energy costs for consumers if companies transfer these additional costs to the market. Alternatively, it may stimulate job creation and economic activity in U.S. shipyards and related sectors by boosting domestic shipbuilding demand.
Stakeholder Impact
Positive Impact on U.S. Shipbuilding Industry: The primary beneficiaries would be U.S. shipyards and ancillary industries that manufacture components for these vessels. The bill is likely to increase demand for American-built ships, potentially leading to job creation and economic growth within this sector. Mariners could also benefit from enhanced training and job opportunities associated with increased vessel construction and operations.
Negative Impact on Energy Exporters and Consumers: The requirement to utilize U.S.-built vessels could increase the costs for energy-exporting companies, which might impact their global competitiveness. These higher costs could translate into increased prices for natural gas and crude oil, affecting consumers and other industries reliant on these energy sources.
Mixed Impact on Trade Relations: The stipulated exceptions due to free trade agreements might lead to variations in enforcement based on international partnerships. This could either aid or hinder relations, depending on how the conditions align with existing trade obligations.
Overall, while the bill intends to promote U.S. industry and workforce development, its broader effects on costs, competitiveness, and trade dynamics warrant careful consideration and balanced implementation to minimize adverse outcomes.
Issues
The requirement for transporting natural gas and crude oil on vessels documented under the laws of the United States may favor U.S. shipbuilding interests, potentially limiting competition from foreign shipbuilders, leading to higher costs for exporters. This issue is covered in Section 2.
The condition for a waiver by the Maritime Administrator based on insufficient domestic manufacturing could lead to delays or inefficiencies if applied subjectively, affecting the timely transportation of energy resources. This concern is highlighted in Section 2.
The percentage requirements for exporting natural gas and crude oil on U.S.-documented vessels increase over time, potentially imposing unrealistic demands on supply and infrastructure capacity. This gradual escalation might lead to operational challenges or increased costs. This issue is detailed in Section 2.
The complexity of paragraph structures and the use of legal jargon may make Section 2 difficult to understand for non-experts, possibly leading to misinterpretation or misapplication of the law.
The exception based on free trade agreements could create inconsistencies in how the law is applied, depending on the trading partner's status, thus affecting the uniformity of the regulation's enforcement. This variant application is noted in Section 2.
There is no clear mechanism for evaluating or enforcing opportunities for U.S. mariners to receive experience and training, which could result in unequal implementation and missed opportunities for workforce development. This issue is mentioned in Section 2.
Use of information from private entities is allowed only when federal information is unavailable, but no guidelines ensure the reliability or impartiality of this private information, potentially affecting the decision-making process. This concern arises in Section 2.
The phrase 'acting through the Administrator of the Energy Information Administration' in Section 3 might be interpreted in different ways, which could lead to confusion regarding precise responsibilities. This requires clarification to ensure transparency and accountability.
The term 'multiyear periods' is vague in Section 3 and could benefit from a more specific definition or guidelines to ensure consistent implementation of the projections and forecasts.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act provides its official name, which is the "Energizing American Shipbuilding Act of 2023".
2. National policy on strategic energy asset export transportation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a national policy for exporting strategic energy assets, specifically requiring natural gas and crude oil exports to be transported on vessels built or documented under U.S. laws. Over time, increasing percentages of exports must be carried on these U.S.-compliant vessels. Waivers can be granted if compliance raises costs significantly, causes delays, or if necessary components are unavailable in the U.S. The policy also mandates training opportunities for U.S. mariners, with exceptions for trade agreements that conflict with these conditions.
3. Energy Information Administration information Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Energy, through the Energy Information Administration, must gather and share online information about natural gas and crude oil exports, including forecasts and data for the upcoming years. This includes specific yearly forecasts and potential multiyear forecasts as deemed appropriate.