Overview

Title

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to aliens who carried out, participated in, planned, financed, supported, or otherwise facilitated the attacks against Israel.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make sure that anyone who helped or was part of bad things against Israel after October 7, 2023, can't come to live in the United States. It's like saying, "If you were part of the bad stuff, you can't join our club here."

Summary AI

The bill, known as the "No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act," aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act. It proposes to make any alien who has been involved in attacks against Israel initiated by Hamas on or after October 7, 2023, inadmissible to the United States. Additionally, these individuals would also be ineligible for any relief under U.S. immigration laws. The bill specifies amendments to certain sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act to enforce these provisions.

Published

2024-01-25
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-01-25
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6679rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
669
Pages:
6
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 184
Verbs: 78
Adjectives: 4
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 37
Entities: 45

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.19
Average Sentence Length:
74.33
Token Entropy:
4.68
Readability (ARI):
38.67

AnalysisAI

General Summary

H.R. 6679, known as the "No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act," is a legislative proposal aimed at altering certain parts of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act. Specifically, it targets foreign nationals who have been involved in any manner with attacks against Israel attributed to Hamas, starting from October 7, 2023. The bill stipulates that these individuals would be barred from entering the United States and would be ineligible for any form of immigration relief under current laws.

Summary of Significant Issues

One key issue with the bill is its lack of clarity on what constitutes an "attack" by Hamas. This ambiguity could complicate the determination of who is subject to these new immigration restrictions. Furthermore, terms like "material support" are used without precise definitions, potentially leading to inconsistent applications of the law. Another concern is that the amendments span multiple sections of the existing Immigration and Nationality Act, which may complicate their implementation. Finally, the complex legal language used could be challenging for individuals without a legal background to understand, possibly leading to misinterpretations.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill reflects an approach to national security that involves restricting immigration as a means of protection against terrorism. By making those linked to Hamas attacks inadmissible, the bill aims to safeguard U.S. national interests. However, this could result in a broad and challenging vetting process, affecting individuals who may have had minimal or indirect involvement. If the provisions are applied too sweepingly, they could impact a significant number of people, including those who might not pose a genuine threat.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For individuals directly affected by this legislation, particularly those seeking entry into the United States from regions associated with Hamas activities, the impact could be profound. Legitimate refugees or asylum seekers who may have unintentionally been tied to these activities could find themselves unjustly barred from the United States. On the other hand, supporters of stricter immigration controls would view this bill as a positive step in protecting national security by ensuring that individuals associated with terrorism cannot enter or remain in the country.

This bill could also pose challenges to immigration and law enforcement officials who would need to navigate the bill’s complex provisions. They might face difficulties in interpreting and applying these changes accurately, potentially leading to legal disputes and challenges.

The bill illustrates the complex balance between protecting national security and ensuring fair and just treatment for all individuals within the immigration system.

Issues

  • The definition of 'attacks against Israel initiated by Hamas beginning on October 7, 2023' may lack clarity in Section 2. This could lead to ambiguities and allow for inconsistent application or interpretation of the law, potentially affecting individuals subject to immigration proceedings.

  • The term 'material support' is used in Section 2 without a clear definition. This could lead to varying interpretations of what constitutes material support, thereby affecting the admissibility or ineligibility of aliens under the new provisions.

  • The amendments are distributed across various sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which could complicate implementation without comprehensive cross-referencing and could potentially lead to legal challenges if not clearly aligned and communicated between the sections.

  • Complex legal language in Section 2 may be difficult for individuals without a legal background to understand, potentially leading to misunderstandings or misinterpretations by those affected by or administering the law.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the official name of the Act is the “No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act.”

2. Aliens who carried out, participated in, planned, financed, supported, or otherwise facilitated attacks against Israel Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In an amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act, this section states that any alien involved with Hamas attacks against Israel starting October 7, 2023, will be inadmissible to the United States and ineligible for immigration relief. It also updates relevant legal provisions to enforce these changes.