Overview

Title

To establish a critical supply chain resiliency and crisis response program in the Department of Commerce, and to secure American leadership in deploying emerging technologies, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants the government to make stronger plans to keep important things we need, like toys or food, coming even when bad stuff happens, like big storms or problems in other countries. It also wants to make sure that America is really good at creating cool new things by helping people work together and keeping some secret information safe.

Summary AI

H.R. 6571, titled the "Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2023," proposes the creation of a program within the Department of Commerce to strengthen the resilience and crisis response capabilities of critical supply chains in the United States. The bill outlines responsibilities for the Assistant Secretary of Commerce to monitor and support critical industries, promote American manufacturing of emerging technologies, and encourage collaboration with other agencies and international partners. It aims to address vulnerabilities and potential disruptions in supply chains through mapping, monitoring, and modeling, as well as by supporting innovation and best practices. Additionally, the bill places emphasis on the confidentiality of voluntarily shared supply chain information and sets provisions for international cooperation in securing these supply chains.

Published

2024-04-26
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-04-26
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6571rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
7,574
Pages:
44
Sentences:
88

Language

Nouns: 2,317
Verbs: 596
Adjectives: 563
Adverbs: 44
Numbers: 200
Entities: 234

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.63
Average Sentence Length:
86.07
Token Entropy:
5.31
Readability (ARI):
46.80

AnalysisAI

The "Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2023" aims to bolster supply chain resiliency and enhance crisis response capabilities within the Department of Commerce. By establishing a new program dedicated to these objectives, the bill seeks to solidify American leadership in deploying emerging technologies and fostering robust, secure domestic supply chains. It assigns additional responsibilities to the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis, focusing on protecting critical industries and reducing dependency on foreign goods. The act encourages collaboration among government entities, industry players, and international partners to enhance supply chain resilience, especially in emerging technological sectors.

Significant Issues

The bill presents several critical concerns that merit consideration. Among the primary issues is the lack of clear definitions for terms such as "critical goods," "critical industries," and "supply chain shocks." This vagueness could lead to ambiguities and arbitrary decisions in policy implementation, potentially affecting transparency and fairness.

Additionally, the bill does not offer specific budgetary details or oversight mechanisms for the proposed critical supply chain resiliency program. This omission raises concerns about financial accountability and potential wasteful spending. Without a clear framework for evaluating success, the program risks becoming inefficient or failing to meet its objectives.

Furthermore, the bill's emphasis on reducing reliance on goods from certain foreign countries might provoke trade tensions and impact international relations. The text lacks explicit criteria detailing which nations are affected, leaving room for interpretation that could lead to diplomatic conflicts.

Moreover, certain provisions, such as the protection of confidential supply chain information, may limit public transparency and oversight, raising ethical concerns about decision-making processes. Additionally, the broad responsibilities assigned to the Assistant Secretary may overlap with other federal agencies' roles, which could lead to inefficiencies or duplicative efforts if not adequately coordinated.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to enhance the United States' ability to respond to supply chain shocks, which could positively impact the public by ensuring a consistent supply of critical goods. By fostering more resilient supply chains, the bill seeks to safeguard the national economy and, by extension, citizens' livelihoods during times of crisis. However, the potential trade tensions stemming from the bill's provisions might lead to higher costs for goods and services, affecting consumers negatively.

The program's focus on emerging technologies could stimulate innovation and create new job opportunities, especially in the manufacturing sector. This development may benefit workers and communities that participate in these high-tech industries. However, smaller businesses and enterprises might face challenges in competing with larger corporations that are better equipped to engage in consultations and provide supply chain information. This disparity could exacerbate existing inequalities within the industry.

Impact on Stakeholders

For industry stakeholders, particularly large corporations, this bill could offer the opportunity to influence national supply chain policy and benefit from government support in implementing best practices and technologies. However, the lack of specific criteria for designating "critical" industries or services might result in inconsistent support or regulation, potentially disadvantaging sectors not recognized as such.

On the international stage, allied and key international partner nations stand to gain from enhanced collaboration with the United States, fostering shared economic growth and stability. Conversely, the bill's provisions to reduce reliance on certain foreign nations could strain diplomatic ties and lead to retaliatory trade measures, impacting international trade and economic relations.

In summary, while the "Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2023" attempts to address vital national security and economic concerns, its success will depend largely on how effectively it is implemented and the extent to which it refines its definitions, criteria, and accountability measures. Ensuring these components are clear and robust will be crucial to realizing the bill's potential benefits for the public, industry, and international partnerships.

Issues

  • The lack of clear definitions and criteria in Section 6 for 'critical goods', 'critical industries', and 'supply chain shocks' may lead to ambiguity and arbitrary decisions, affecting transparency and fairness in policy implementation.

  • Section 3 concerning the 'Critical Supply Chain Resiliency and Crisis Response Program' lacks specific budgetary details and oversight mechanisms, raising concerns about financial accountability and potential wasteful spending.

  • Sections 2 and 3 emphasize reducing reliance on goods from certain foreign countries, risking trade tensions and international relations as the text lacks clarity and explicit criteria on affected nations.

  • The protection of confidential supply chain information in Section 3 could limit transparency and public oversight, potentially affecting accountability and raising ethical concerns about decision-making processes.

  • The vague language in Section 2 regarding the responsibilities of the Assistant Secretary could lead to overlaps with other agencies' roles, causing inefficiencies or duplicative efforts if not adequately coordinated.

  • Section 3's provision for voluntary submission of information might favor larger corporations with resources to influence consultations, thereby creating an uneven playing field and potentially disadvantaging smaller entities.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section introduces the Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2023, providing its short title and listing the various sections within the act, such as new responsibilities for the Assistant Secretary of Commerce, programs for supply chain resiliency and innovation, and definitions pertinent to the act.

2. Additional responsibilities of Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis will have additional responsibilities that include promoting U.S. leadership in critical industries, supporting resilient supply chains, encouraging domestic manufacturing growth, and assisting in responding to supply chain disruptions. They are also tasked with encouraging the relocation of manufacturing to the U.S. and partner nations and creating capabilities to assess technology and innovation.

3. Critical supply chain resiliency and crisis response program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill establishes a critical supply chain resiliency and crisis response program within the Department of Commerce to strengthen and protect critical supply chains, particularly for emerging technologies. This involves coordinating with other governments and partners, identifying vulnerabilities and risks, and finding ways to improve the supply chain's strength and security, with a focus on protecting information and encouraging industry collaboration.

4. Critical supply chain innovation and best practices Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill mandates the Assistant Secretary to help develop guidelines for improving the resilience and security of critical supply chains, in collaboration with private sector and government partners. It encourages using technologies like blockchain for tracking and suggests voluntary methods for enhancing supply chain efficiency, while ensuring that participation by private entities remains optional.

5. Department of Commerce capability assessment Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a requirement for the Secretary of Commerce to create a report detailing the roles, responsibilities, and resources within the Department of Commerce that relate to critical supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. The report should assess the effectiveness of these elements and offer recommendations to improve them, with a strategy to implement these recommendations submitted to Congress within two years.

6. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text defines key terms used in a bill related to critical supply chains, including what constitutes an agency, ally nations, critical goods, and the responsibilities of various stakeholders such as the Assistant Secretary and domestic enterprises. It also outlines concepts like critical infrastructure, emerging technologies, relevant congressional committees, and circumstances that can cause a supply chain shock, ensuring clarity in how these terms apply within the context of the Act.