Overview

Title

To establish a critical supply chain resiliency and crisis response program in the Department of Commerce, and to secure American leadership in deploying emerging technologies, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6571 is a bill that wants to help make sure important things people need, like technology and supplies, always get to where they're needed. It plans to support making these things in America and try to make things work better so there won't be problems when bad things happen.

Summary AI

H.R. 6571, titled the "Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2023," aims to create a program within the Department of Commerce to enhance the resilience of critical supply chains in the United States. The bill proposes to identify and support critical industries and technologies vital for national security and economic stability, encourage partnerships to strengthen supply chains, and reduce reliance on foreign goods from countries that pose risks to the U.S. Additionally, it seeks to improve crisis response by identifying vulnerabilities and investing in domestic manufacturing capabilities while promoting innovation in supply chain practices.

Published

2023-12-04
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2023-12-04
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6571ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
7,305
Pages:
41
Sentences:
74

Language

Nouns: 2,238
Verbs: 560
Adjectives: 569
Adverbs: 42
Numbers: 165
Entities: 248

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.69
Average Sentence Length:
98.72
Token Entropy:
5.29
Readability (ARI):
53.40

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the "Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2023," aims to bolster the resilience of critical supply chains within the United States. It intends to ensure American leadership in deploying emerging technologies, especially in light of potential supply chain disruptions. This bill involves creating a specialized program within the Department of Commerce to address these issues, which it will do through monitoring, modeling, and collaboration efforts with domestic and international partners. The overarching goal is to safeguard national and economic security by making supply chains more robust and adaptable.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises several important considerations and potential challenges. One of the primary concerns is the lack of specified budget limits, which could lead to unchecked spending, especially in areas with broad scopes, such as promoting U.S. leadership in emerging technologies and managing supply chain resilience. This ambiguity in financial allocation can pose risks of wasteful expenditure without clear accountability.

There is also vagueness surrounding definitions within the bill, particularly with terms such as "ally or key international partner nation" and "countries of concern." These terms could result in uncertainties in the application of strategies meant to protect national security. Additionally, the definition of "emerging technology" uses a static list, which runs the risk of becoming outdated as new technologies develop rapidly.

The establishment of a "unified coordination group" and several subgroups might lead to bureaucratic redundancies and inefficiencies, potentially hindering swift responses to supply chain issues. Moreover, the lack of accountability measures or oversight mechanisms presents a challenge to ensuring the effectiveness and efficiency of the assigned responsibilities.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

For the general public, the bill aims to provide greater security and stability to the U.S. economy by reinforcing critical supply chains. In times of crisis, such as natural disasters or geopolitical conflicts, a resilient supply chain can mean more reliable access to necessary goods and services at stable prices. However, without careful management, the enactment of the bill could lead to increased federal spending without corresponding benefits to taxpayers.

For specific stakeholders, the impact is multifaceted. Domestic manufacturers and enterprises might benefit from increased attention and resources directed towards strengthening supply chains, potentially leading to new business opportunities and jobs, especially in emerging technology sectors. However, the ambiguity in definitions and countries of concern could pose challenges for companies with international operations, as they might face inconsistent policy applications that could affect their operations.

International partners, categorized as allies or key nations, may benefit from collaborations aimed at enhancing global supply chain security. On the flip side, the vagueness in identifying "countries of concern" could lead to diplomatic strains if any actions appear unilateral or inconsistent.

Overall, the bill presents an ambitious framework for ensuring supply chain resilience and maintaining the competitive edge of U.S. industries. Its success, however, hinges on clarifying definitions, ensuring budgetary controls, and establishing clear lines of accountability and oversight. By addressing these factors, the legislation could more effectively safeguard both national interests and the broader economic well-being.

Issues

  • The bill does not specify budget limits or constraints, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending across various sections, particularly in Section 3 and Section 4.

  • The definition of 'ally or key international partner nation' in Section 2 could be seen as ambiguous, particularly concerning which countries pose a significant national security or economic security risk to the United States, affecting US diplomatic and economic strategies.

  • The lack of specificity regarding which countries are considered 'countries of concern' in Sections 3 and 4 could lead to ambiguous interpretations and inconsistent policy applications.

  • The term 'emerging technology' includes a list in Section 2 that may quickly become outdated, necessitating frequent updates to incorporate new technologies, potentially impacting the bill's relevance and effectiveness.

  • The establishment and management of a 'unified coordination group' and subgroups in Section 4 could result in bureaucratic overlap and inefficiencies, affecting the timely response to supply chain issues.

  • There is no mention of accountability measures or oversight mechanisms in Section 3 to ensure that the expanded responsibilities are carried out effectively and efficiently, increasing the risk of mismanagement.

  • The exemption of voluntarily submitted critical supply chain information from Freedom of Information Act disclosures in Section 4 might limit transparency and accountability, raising ethical concerns about government openness.

  • The lengthy timeline for completing the Department of Commerce capability assessment report in Section 6 could delay necessary improvements in supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation, affecting national readiness.

  • The public comment and review process for designating critical industries, supply chains, and goods in Section 4 may be lengthy and contentious, potentially delaying critical actions at times of national need.

  • Section 5 suggests a substantial role for the federal government in fostering supply chain innovation without providing specifics that ensure efficient use of resources or avoid potential wasteful spending.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the short title for the legislation, which is named the “Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2023.”

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section provides definitions for various terms related to maintaining and enhancing the United States' critical supply chains. These include terms like "agency," "critical good," "emerging technology," and "supply chain shock," among others, which are crucial for understanding how to ensure national and economic security by managing the supply of essential materials and technologies.

3. Responsibilities assigned to Assistant Secretary Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Assistant Secretary has been tasked with promoting U.S. leadership in critical industries and technologies, supporting resilient and diverse supply chains, encouraging manufacturing growth, particularly in rural and underserved areas, and creating jobs with good wages. They must also help the government prepare for supply chain shocks and encourage reliance on domestic sources for critical goods.

4. Critical supply chain resiliency and crisis response program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a program within the Department of Commerce to strengthen critical supply chains by mapping, monitoring, and modeling them and identifying vulnerabilities and opportunities for improvement. It involves collaboration with state, local, and international partners, ensures protection of confidential information, and requires regular reports and updates to Congress, with the program set to end after seven years.

5. Critical supply chain innovation and best practices Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines responsibilities for the Assistant Secretary to help manufacturers improve their critical supply chains by providing guidelines and collaborating with both private sector stakeholders and government agencies. It emphasizes the use of new technologies, such as blockchain, to ensure the security and resilience of these supply chains, while also highlighting that participation and adoption of these practices is voluntary for private entities.

6. Department of Commerce capability assessment Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Commerce is required to prepare a report within two years that evaluates the organization's capabilities in handling important supply chain and manufacturing innovation tasks. This report will identify existing duties and resources, assess their effectiveness, and offer recommendations to improve these areas, with its findings and implementation strategies to be shared with relevant congressional committees.