Overview
Title
An Act To prohibit unfair and deceptive advertising of prices for hotel rooms and other places of short-term lodging, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants hotels and places where people stay overnight to show the real price, including all extra costs, when they advertise, so everyone knows how much they will actually pay.
Summary AI
H. R. 6543, also known as the "No Hidden Fees on Extra Expenses for Stays Act of 2023," aims to stop unfair and misleading advertising of hotel room and short-term lodging prices in the United States. It requires that all mandatory fees be included in the advertised prices so consumers know what they will actually pay. The bill allows the Federal Trade Commission and state officials to enforce these rules, with the FTC able to intervene in state actions. Furthermore, it establishes that there should be one national standard, preventing states from having separate advertising laws for these services but allows states to still regulate related issues like fraud.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, entitled the "No Hidden FEES Act of 2023," aims to enhance transparency and consumer protection in the hospitality industry by prohibiting unfair and deceptive advertising involving prices for hotel rooms and other short-term lodging arrangements. The bill mandates that any advertised price must prominently include all mandatory fees, ensuring consumers are not misled about the actual cost of their stay. It empowers both the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and individual states to enforce these provisions, providing a unified standard across the United States to govern how lodging is advertised and sold.
Summary of Significant Issues
A significant issue with the bill is the lack of a clear definition of what constitutes a "mandatory fee." This absence could lead to confusion and uneven enforcement, as different entities might interpret the term in various ways. The bill also broadly preempts state and local laws, potentially clashing with existing consumer protection frameworks that might offer greater protection to consumers.
Another concern is the exclusion of certain providers operating under corporate, government, or institutional travel management programs. This exception could create loopholes, allowing some providers to sidestep the transparency requirements intended by the bill.
Additionally, the bill relies heavily on complex legal language and references to existing laws. This complexity might pose challenges for individuals without a legal background, further complicating enforcement and understanding of the law.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the bill aims to offer a clearer understanding of the total costs associated with short-term lodging, reducing the likelihood of consumers being surprised by undisclosed fees at checkout. By mandating complete disclosure of mandatory fees upfront, consumers can make more informed decisions and compare accommodation prices more accurately.
However, ambiguity surrounding key terms, like "mandatory fee," might lead to inconsistencies, allowing some entities to find ways around the requirements. Such loopholes could diminish consumer trust and reduce the bill's effectiveness in providing pricing transparency.
Impact on Stakeholders
Consumers: The bill is primarily beneficial to consumers by seeking to eliminate unexpected costs during hotel stays and other short-term lodging arrangements. Transparent pricing allows consumers to compare options without the fear of hidden fees.
Lodging Providers: While the law promotes fairness in advertising, it could impose additional compliance burdens on lodging providers. They will be required to reevaluate and potentially alter their pricing models to ensure all mandatory fees are included in the advertised prices. This may require administrative adjustments and could increase operational costs.
State Governments: The preemption of state laws could cause tension, particularly in states with advanced consumer protection laws. States may be limited in how they enforce local consumer rights, creating potential bureaucratic and legal challenges.
Federal and State Enforcement Agencies: The FTC and state attorneys general are tasked with enforcing the provisions of this bill. Although enforcement mechanisms are outlined, the complexity and vagueness of certain provisions may complicate enforcement efforts, requiring agencies to develop additional guidelines or engage in litigation to resolve ambiguities.
In conclusion, while the No Hidden FEES Act of 2023 generally seeks to enhance consumer protection in the lodging industry, its implementation may be challenged by unclear definitions and potential conflicts with existing state laws. Stakeholders will need to navigate these complexities to achieve the bill’s intended consumer benefits.
Issues
The lack of a definition for 'mandatory fee' in Section 2 could lead to ambiguity in enforcement, making it difficult to uniformly apply the law across different entities. This uncertainty may allow covered providers to manipulate pricing without full transparency, undermining the bill's intent to prevent misleading advertising.
The broad preemption of state and local laws in Section 4 potentially raises federalism concerns. This provision could invalidate existing state consumer protection laws that may offer greater or different protections regarding short-term lodging pricing.
The exclusion of 'covered providers' defined in Section 5 for entities operating under a corporate, government, or institutional travel management program could be exploited, creating potential loopholes that undermine the bill’s intent by allowing certain providers to offer reservation prices that might not be fully transparent.
The lack of guidelines for what constitutes 'clearly and conspicuously disclosed' pricing in Section 2 presents a risk for inconsistent interpretation and enforcement, resulting in potential disputes between consumers and providers regarding what constitutes adequate disclosure.
The reliance on complex legal language and cross-references within Section 3 could make the enforcement provisions difficult for non-legal professionals, including state officials and consumers, to understand and apply, potentially reducing the effectiveness of the bill's regulatory framework.
The exclusion of governmental taxes and fees from the definition of 'mandatory fee' in Section 5 might cause confusion for consumers, as they may still encounter unexpected charges despite the intentions of the bill to promote transparency in pricing.
The absence of an explicit effective date in Section 6 for previous bookings before the bill's effectiveness could cause confusion about the applicability of new regulations, potentially affecting both providers and consumers in ongoing transactions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act explains that it can be called the “No Hidden Fees on Extra Expenses for Stays Act of 2023” or simply the “No Hidden FEES Act of 2023”.
2. Prohibition on unfair and deceptive advertising of hotel room and other short-term lodging prices Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A bill section restricts hotels and short-term lodging providers from advertising reservation prices that exclude mandatory fees. However, they may show individual components of the price, like fees or taxes, as long as the total price is clearly stated.
3. Enforcement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines how the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state authorities can enforce rules against unfair or deceptive practices. The FTC is empowered to act as if the rules were part of the Federal Trade Commission Act, while state officials can also take action if their residents are affected by such practices, but they must notify the FTC before doing so. States can't act if the federal government is already pursuing a lawsuit against the same defendants for the same violations.
4. One national standard Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the bill prevents states from enforcing laws that restrict how a company can advertise or sell prices for short-term lodgings in interstate commerce, unless those state laws are about contracts, torts, fraud, or personal information breaches.
5. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, several key terms are defined for clarity. These include the Federal Trade Commission, various travel management programs, a covered provider for short-term lodging that excludes certain programs, what constitutes a mandatory fee, what qualifies as a place of short-term lodging, and the definition of a State.
6. Application to prior bookings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 6 of the bill states that the rule mentioned in Section 2(a) will only apply to reservations for short-term lodging that are made on or after the date this law becomes effective.
7. Effective date Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Act will become effective exactly one year after the day it is enacted.