Overview
Title
An Act To prohibit unfair and deceptive advertising of prices for hotel rooms and other places of short-term lodging, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The No Hidden FEES Act of 2023 says that when you see a price for a hotel room, it has to show all the extra costs upfront, so there are no hidden surprises. If hotels don't do this, they can get in trouble with the government.
Summary AI
The No Hidden FEES Act of 2023 aims to ensure that consumers are not misled by unfair or deceptive advertising of prices for hotel rooms and other short-term lodgings. It requires all mandatory fees in the total price to be clearly disclosed when reservations are offered for sale. The Federal Trade Commission is responsible for enforcing this law, treating violations as unfair or deceptive acts. States can also enforce the law, but must coordinate with the Federal Trade Commission if they plan to take legal action.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "No Hidden FEES Act of 2023," also known as H.R. 6543, is a legislative effort aimed at enhancing transparency in the pricing of hotel rooms and other short-term lodging. The bill's primary goal is to prohibit hotels and similar short-term lodging providers from advertising reservation prices that do not include mandatory fees. By mandating that all necessary fees be included in the initial price display, the bill seeks to address consumer frustration over hidden charges that often appear during the booking process. Enforcement of these regulations is to be carried out by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), with states also having the ability to take legal action under certain conditions.
Significant Issues
One of the main issues identified in the bill is the ambiguity surrounding what qualifies as a "mandatory fee." The lack of a clear definition could lead to inconsistent enforcement and potential legal disputes between lodging providers and regulators. Additionally, the term "covered provider" is not well-defined, which may cause confusion regarding which entities are subject to the bill's requirements.
Another concern is the complexity of the language used, particularly in the sections detailing enforcement. The heavy reliance on legal references could make it challenging for those without a legal background to fully comprehend the bill's implications. Further, the bill's preemption of state laws could create conflicts with existing regulations that individual states may have regarding consumer protection and transparent pricing.
Impact on the Public
The public could benefit from the bill through increased transparency and potentially reduced instances of feeling misled by initially advertised prices. By including all mandatory fees upfront, consumers can make more informed decisions without the surprise of additional costs during the booking process. This clarity can foster a greater sense of trust between consumers and lodging providers.
However, the bill's effectiveness hinges on its implementation and whether lodging providers adhere to these guidelines without exploiting any loopholes. If the terms remain vague, especially regarding "mandatory fees," consumers might continue to experience confusion and frustration.
Impact on Stakeholders
Consumers stand to gain positively from the bill as it promises more straightforward pricing information, enabling more accurate budget planning and decision-making. However, if the necessary details on fees and coverage are not clearly defined, consumers might not see a significant improvement in practice.
Lodging Providers might need to adjust their advertising and pricing structures to comply with the new regulations. While this could mean an end to practices that some consumers perceive as deceptive, it could initially cause administrative and operational changes. Providers not clearly defined by the bill might also find themselves navigating uncertain legal territory.
State Authorities will have restricted abilities to enforce local laws that conflict with this federal standard. This aspect could be seen as a federal overreach by some states, especially those with existing consumer protection laws. States could face challenges in aligning their laws with federal mandates, potentially delaying or complicating enforcement efforts.
Overall, the bill aims to boost transparency and fairness in hotel and lodging pricing, a positive step for consumer rights. However, differing interpretations of key terms and the interaction between federal and state laws pose challenges that must be addressed to ensure the bill fulfills its intended purpose effectively.
Issues
The bill does not specify what constitutes a 'mandatory fee' in Sections 2 and 4, leading to potential ambiguity in enforcement and interpretation. This could impact consumers who may not be informed of all costs upfront, resulting in legal challenges to the regulation.
Sections 2 and 4 do not define 'covered provider,' which could lead to confusion about which entities are subject to the regulation. This lack of clarity might hinder effective enforcement and leave some providers outside the scope of regulation.
The regulation does not address how to handle situations where taxes or fees change after the initial advertisement but before booking completion, as noted in Section 2. This could lead to disputes between consumers and providers and undermine the regulation's effectiveness.
The complex language used in Sections 3 and 4, with heavy reliance on legal references, might be difficult for individuals without a legal background to understand. This complexity may obstruct the bill's implementation and its acceptance by stakeholders.
Section 4 broadly preempts state and local laws, which may conflict with existing consumer protection laws regarding short-term lodging pricing, raising federalism concerns. States with more stringent regulations might see this as an overreach of federal authority.
Section 6 lacks sufficient detail and does not define what constitutes a 'place of short-term lodging.' This oversight could lead to various interpretations and loopholes, affecting the regulation's uniform application.
The provision in Section 3(b) for State action limitations during pending Federal actions could create logistical challenges or conflicts, needing clearer resolution mechanisms or guidance, which might delay enforcement actions at the state level.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act explains that it can be called the “No Hidden Fees on Extra Expenses for Stays Act of 2023” or simply the “No Hidden FEES Act of 2023”.
2. Prohibition on unfair and deceptive advertising of hotel room and other short-term lodging prices Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A bill section restricts hotels and short-term lodging providers from advertising reservation prices that exclude mandatory fees. However, they may show individual components of the price, like fees or taxes, as long as the total price is clearly stated.
3. Enforcement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines how the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state authorities can enforce rules against unfair or deceptive practices. The FTC is empowered to act as if the rules were part of the Federal Trade Commission Act, while state officials can also take action if their residents are affected by such practices, but they must notify the FTC before doing so. States can't act if the federal government is already pursuing a lawsuit against the same defendants for the same violations.
4. One national standard Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the bill prevents states from enforcing laws that restrict how a company can advertise or sell prices for short-term lodgings in interstate commerce, unless those state laws are about contracts, torts, fraud, or personal information breaches.
5. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, several key terms are defined for clarity. These include the Federal Trade Commission, various travel management programs, a covered provider for short-term lodging that excludes certain programs, what constitutes a mandatory fee, what qualifies as a place of short-term lodging, and the definition of a State.
6. Application to prior bookings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 6 of the bill states that the rule mentioned in Section 2(a) will only apply to reservations for short-term lodging that are made on or after the date this law becomes effective.
7. Effective date Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Act will become effective exactly one year after the day it is enacted.