Overview
Title
To require the Federal Communications Commission to auction spectrum in the band between 1.3 gigahertz and 13.2 gigahertz, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants the FCC to sell parts of the airwaves to companies so they can use them for things like making your phone or internet work better and faster.
Summary AI
H.R. 651, known as the "Spectrum Pipeline Act of 2025," is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives on January 23, 2025. It mandates the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to auction off radio frequency spectrum in the range of 1.3 to 13.2 gigahertz. The goal is to allocate at least 2,500 megahertz for commercial and non-Federal uses, ensuring a portion is available for full-power commercial services. The bill also outlines requirements for reports to Congress and adjusts the process for relocating federal uses to free up the spectrum for private sector use.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 651, known as the "Spectrum Pipeline Act of 2025," proposes to have the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) auction off specific radio frequency spectrums ranging from 1.3 gigahertz to 13.2 gigahertz. This auction aims to reallocate spectrum currently used by federal entities for non-federal use, shared federal and non-federal use, or a combination thereof. A substantial portion, at least 1250 megahertz, is earmarked for full-power commercial licensed use. The bill stipulates detailed timelines for identifying and auctioning this spectrum and mandates comprehensive reporting to Congress regarding progress. Additionally, it establishes changes to the Spectrum Relocation Fund, primarily updating notification timelines and accommodating the transition to state-of-the-art systems when appropriate.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues emerge from this bill. Firstly, the extensive reporting requirements could impose a substantial administrative burden on the Assistant Secretary and the Commission, potentially affecting the timely execution and oversight of the spectrum reallocation process. Secondly, reducing notification timelines from 30 or 60 days to 15 days might rush decisions, increasing the risk of errors due to insufficient analysis. The language regarding auction schedules could also be challenging for non-experts to grasp, leading to potential misunderstandings. Furthermore, the global harmonization clause is vague and could lead to inefficiencies if international standards conflict with U.S. interests. Fiscal implications are somewhat obscured due to a lack of detail on financial requirements, which could impact transparency and budget planning. Finally, introducing the concept of "state-of-the-art" systems may create ambiguity regarding what qualifies and whether such upgrades are justified cost-wise.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The public could experience several potential impacts from this bill. By reallocating spectrum for commercial use, the bill could enhance wireless broadband services, improving connectivity for consumers and fostering innovation. The reallocation could also create business opportunities in the technology and telecommunications sectors, potentially leading to job creation and economic growth. However, the proposed changes may lead to practical challenges if the process is burdened by administrative delays or ambiguities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Different stakeholders may experience varied impacts from this legislation. Commercial entities in the telecommunications sector stand to benefit from increased access to spectrum, which can aid in expanding their services and customer base. However, federal entities may face disruptions during the transition period as spectrum is reallocated, necessitating careful coordination to mitigate operational impacts.
For regulators such as the FCC and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), fulfilling the rigorous reporting and compliance requirements could necessitate additional resources or adjustments in operations. Policymakers must consider these demands to ensure effective implementation without overwhelming the agencies involved.
In conclusion, while the "Spectrum Pipeline Act of 2025" sets a forward-thinking framework for spectrum allocation that could boost commercial activities and technology integration, the issues identified suggest a need for thoughtful consideration and possible refinements to avoid adverse outcomes and maximize the legislation's benefits.
Issues
The extensive reporting requirements in Section 2(h) could place a significant administrative burden on the Assistant Secretary and the Commission, potentially leading to resource allocation issues. This is critical as it may affect the timely execution and oversight of the spectrum reallocation process.
The reduction of notification timelines from '30 days' and '60 days' to '15 days' in Section 3 might lead to rushed decisions without adequate time for thorough review, increasing the risk of errors in decision-making and insufficient analysis.
Section 2(c) uses complex legal language regarding auction schedules, making it difficult for non-experts to understand, potentially leading to misinterpretation. Clear understanding is crucial for all stakeholders involved in the auction process.
The requirement for global harmonization in Section 2(h)(2)(B)(iv) is vague, which could lead to conflicts or inefficiencies if international standards diverge from U.S. interests. This has implications for maintaining competitiveness and global integration.
The lack of clarification on financial requirements referenced in Section 2(f) might obscure fiscal implications, affecting budgetary planning and transparency for the auction and reallocation process.
The amendment in Section 3(b) regarding the replacement of systems with 'state-of-the-art' systems introduces ambiguity in determining what qualifies as 'state-of-the-art' and whether such upgrades are justified.
The heavy reliance on future compliance checks in Section 2 could lead to delays or inconsistencies if there are gaps in oversight or miscommunication between involved entities, posing a risk to the overall effectiveness of the bill's implementation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill is the short title, which states that this law can be referred to as the "Spectrum Pipeline Act of 2025".
2. Identification of spectrum for reallocation and auction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a plan for reallocating and auctioning radio frequencies, specifically between 1.3 and 13.2 gigahertz, for both federal and non-federal use, including at least 1250 megahertz for commercial use. It establishes timelines for identifying and auctioning the spectrum, mandates reports to Congress on progress, and emphasizes that auction proceeds should cover the full costs of relocating federal operations.
3. Spectrum Relocation Fund modernization Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Organization Act aim to update the notification timelines for Congress, reducing them from 30 or 60 days to 15 days. Additionally, they allow for the use of state-of-the-art systems and equipment if they significantly help transfer valuable spectrum frequencies from federal to non-federal or shared use, as long as this does not compromise spectrum reallocation goals.