Overview
Title
To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide enhanced safety in pipeline transportation, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 6494 is a bill that wants to make pipelines safer by setting new rules, like using better materials and sharing safety information, with plans to spend money on safety projects to help everyone stay safe.
Summary AI
H.R. 6494, also known as the “Promoting Innovation in Pipeline Efficiency and Safety Act of 2023” or the “PIPES Act of 2023,” aims to enhance pipeline safety in the United States by amending title 49 of the U.S. Code. Introduced by Mr. Graves of Missouri and others, the bill proposes various measures, including regulatory updates, workforce development, and enhanced standards for carbon dioxide pipelines. It also emphasizes study and research on pipeline materials like hydrogen, and calls for the establishment of a voluntary information-sharing system, among other safety-enhancing initiatives.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The Promoting Innovation in Pipeline Efficiency and Safety Act of 2023, also known as the PIPES Act of 2023, aims to amend title 49 of the United States Code to enhance the safety standards and practices in pipeline transportation. This legislation covers a broad array of topics, including funding appropriations, regulatory updates, safety standards, workforce development, and measures aimed at innovation in this sector. The Act addresses the integration of carbon dioxide pipelines into existing safety regulations and establishes a new framework to encourage the sharing of safety information among industry stakeholders through a confidential information-sharing system. Additionally, it proposes fiscal allocations for various safety grants and programs from 2024 to 2027.
Summary of Significant Issues
A prominent issue with this bill is the complexity and intricacy of funding allocations detailed in the authorization of appropriations. The section proposes significant appropriations without clear guidance on ensuring financial accountability, which may potentially lead to inefficiencies. Furthermore, the introduction of carbon dioxide pipeline regulations could create jurisdictional conflicts, leading to regulatory burdens. The bill also includes discretionary power for the Secretary of Transportation to waive existing regulations in workforce development, which could lead to regulatory loopholes. Additionally, the mandated 18-month review process for special permits could delay safety decisions, potentially putting public safety at risk.
The voluntary information-sharing system introduced in the bill involves significant financial appropriations and decision-making processes that could raise concerns about transparency, particularly since it envisions confidentiality that could limit public or agency access to critical safety information. Penalties for causing infrastructure disruptions and proposed increases in civil penalties also call for further justification and specificity to ensure fair and effective application.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the PIPES Act of 2023 has the potential to significantly enhance pipeline safety by fostering better safety standards and introducing innovative practices in pipeline management and operation. These improvements could lead to increased public safety and reduce the risk of pipeline-related incidents. However, the potential for financial inefficiency in how appropriations are handled could divert resources from public safety programs that would otherwise benefit directly from these funds.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Pipeline Operators and Industry: While the bill offers industry compliance updates and the opportunity for information sharing, operators might face increased costs and complexity due to new regulations, particularly for carbon dioxide pipelines. There is also concern about how industry standards are applied, given the Secretary’s discretion in adopting or rejecting them without clear criteria.
State and Federal Agencies: Agencies responsible for pipeline oversight may experience increased workloads due to more stringent reporting and regulatory requirements. Yet, they may also benefit from clearer safety protocols and better stakeholder coordination.
Public Safety Organizations and Environmental Groups: These groups may view the bill positively, as it emphasizes safety and environmental protection measures. Nevertheless, the confidentiality provisions could limit their access to safety data, potentially hindering advocacy efforts.
Community Stakeholders and Landowners: The bill's proposed changes, especially those concerning rights-of-way management and the introduction of alternate land use strategies, might impact landowners and local communities. The benefits of these strategies could be positive if they are implemented effectively; however, unclear guidelines might create leasing or property management challenges.
In conclusion, the PIPES Act of 2023 presents both opportunities and challenges. Its aim to bolster pipeline safety and regulatory frameworks is commendable, but careful attention must be paid to ensure that it does not inadvertently sideline important considerations like financial accountability and effective stakeholder engagement.
Financial Assessment
The “Promoting Innovation in Pipeline Efficiency and Safety Act of 2023,” or H.R. 6494, proposes several financial appropriations and expenditures related to enhancing pipeline safety across the United States. This commentary will outline the key financial aspects of the bill and their relation to the issues identified.
Authorization of Appropriations
The bill authorizes significant funds to be appropriated from various sources to support its initiatives:
Section 2 (Authorization of Appropriations) outlines a series of financial allocations for fiscal years 2024 through 2027. It specifies that $181,400,000 for FY 2024, $189,800,000 for FY 2025, $198,200,000 for FY 2026, and $206,600,000 for FY 2027 are allocated for gas and hazardous liquid safety activities. Additionally, from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, amounts like $30,000,000 for FY 2024 and similar amounts for subsequent years are designated for hazardous liquid safety measures. These appropriations intend to enhance various pipeline safety measures, including grants and operational expenses.
Operational Expenses for various programs are also detailed. For example, the section revises previous funding levels for operational expenses, increasing them to $31,000,000 for FY 2024 up to $34,000,000 for FY 2027.
These financial commitments reflect the bill’s scope in addressing pipeline safety through considerable investment, but they also relate to the potential challenges identified in ensuring financial accountability and transparency due to the complex breakdown of funding. The detailed allocations across different fiscal years and programs introduce complexity that could potentially result in financial inefficiencies or transparency concerns as highlighted in the issues section.
Voluntary Information-Sharing System
- Section 24 establishes a Voluntary Information-Sharing System (VIS) with designated funding, authorizing $1,000,000 for FY 2024 and $10,000,000 annually for FY 2025 through FY 2027. These amounts are allocated for the program’s establishment and maintenance, involving data collection and dissemination related to pipeline safety.
This system aims to improve pipeline safety by promoting shared learning and insights from across the industry. However, the financial oversight and decision-making processes (predicated on a super-majority rule) may raise concerns about effective checks and balances. Proper management of these funds will be essential to ensure that the investment in VIS yields the intended safety improvements while maintaining transparency and ensuring public or agency access to valuable information.
Other Financial Considerations
- Amendments within Section 22 propose increasing the civil penalties for violations from $2,000,000 to $2,500,000. While this potentially enhances deterrence and improves compliance, the amendment’s effectiveness directly aligns with ensuring these increased penalties are warranted by the safety violations they intend to prevent or mitigate.
The adjustment in fines and the expansion of financial supports, such as grants, reflect a concerted effort to incentivize and enforce compliance in pipeline safety. However, further context about these financial allocations, like the sufficiency of penalties or the necessity of increased appropriations, could enhance understanding of their potential impact on safety practices.
In summary, while H.R. 6494 presents substantial financial appropriations aimed at improving pipeline safety and efficiency, ensuring that these funds are managed with transparency and efficacy will be crucial. The concerns about financial complexity and oversight suggest that a careful and thorough review process should accompany the implementation of these appropriations to maximize their intended benefits while safeguarding against inefficiencies.
Issues
The authorization of appropriations section may lead to potential financial inefficiencies and challenges in ensuring financial accountability and transparency due to the complex breakdown of funding and allocations for various grant programs and operational expenses (Section 2).
The introduction of carbon dioxide pipeline regulations could add complexity and potentially lead to jurisdictional conflicts or duplicate regulatory burdens between existing environmental regulations, posing a financial and operational challenge to operators (Section 25).
The discretionary power given to the Secretary to waive existing regulations in workforce development could lead to potential regulatory loopholes or abuse, raising ethical and operational concerns (Section 4).
The lack of specified criteria for adopting or rejecting industry standards could lead to ambiguity and inconsistency in regulatory updates, impacting public trust and industry compliance (Section 6).
The special permit program's lengthy application review period of 18 months could delay important decisions related to pipeline safety, potentially putting public safety at risk (Section 17).
The excavation damage prevention program's lack of clear designation on who certifies training for professionals and the vague definition of commercially available technologies could result in inconsistent standards and potential favoritism (Section 18).
The voluntary information-sharing system (VIS) involves significant appropriations and decisions by a super-majority which may raise concerns about effective checks and balances, transparency, and public or agency access to valuable pipeline safety information (Section 24).
The penalty for causing a defect in or disrupting pipeline operations lacks specificity, leading to potential inconsistent application in enforcement, raising legal concerns (Section 21).
The hydrogen study includes extensive international data gathering which could complicate the study with substantial resource allocation, potentially delaying necessary regulations for hydrogen-natural gas blending (Section 20).
The amendment to increase civil penalties for pipeline safety violations requires further justification and context to ensure they appropriately address underlying issues, questioning its necessity and impact (Section 22).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents; definition Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Promoting Innovation in Pipeline Efficiency and Safety Act of 2023, also known as the PIPES Act of 2023, includes various sections that outline its objectives, such as funding, development of the workforce, updates to regulations, and safety advancements. The act also explains that in this context, the term "State" refers to its definition in section 60101(a) of title 49 of the United States Code.
2. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill outlines the authorized funding amounts from 2024 to 2027 for various pipeline safety and program improvements. It specifies different allocations for gas and hazardous liquid projects, operational expenses, one-call notification programs, emergency response grants, community safety information, technical assistance, damage prevention, and pipeline integrity, with detailed amounts for each fiscal year.
Money References
- “(1) IN GENERAL.—From fees collected under section 60301, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out section 12 of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355) and the provisions of this chapter relating to gas and hazardous liquid— “(A) $181,400,000 for fiscal year 2024, of which— “(i) $9,000,000 shall be used to carry out section 12 of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355); and “(ii) $73,000,000 shall be used for making grants; “(B) $189,800,000 for fiscal year 2025, of which— “(i) $9,000,000 shall be used to carry out section 12 of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355); and “(ii) $75,000,000 shall be used for making grants; “(C) $198,200,000 for fiscal year 2026, of which— “(i) $9,000,000 shall be used to carry out section 12 of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355); and “(ii) $77,000,000 shall be used for making grants; and “(D) $206,600,000 for fiscal year 2027, of which— “(i) $9,000,000 shall be used to carry out section 12 of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355); and “(ii) $79,000,000 shall be used for making grants.
- “(2) TRUST FUND AMOUNTS.—In addition to the amounts authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1), there are authorized to be appropriated from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund established by section 9509(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to carry out section 12 of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355) and the provisions of this chapter relating to hazardous liquid— “(A) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2024, of which— “(i) $2,000,000, pursuant to the authority in section 12(f) of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355), shall be used to carry out section 12 of such Act; and “(ii) $11,000,000 shall be used for making grants; “(B) $30,500,000 for fiscal year 2025, of which— “(i) $2,000,000, pursuant to the authority in section 12(f) of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355), shall be used to carry out section 12 of such Act; and “(ii) $11,500,000 shall be used for making grants; “(C) $31,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, of which— “(i) $2,000,000, pursuant to the authority in section 12(f) of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355), shall be used to carry out section 12 of such Act; and “(ii) $12,000,000 shall be used for making grants; and “(D) $31,500,000 for fiscal year 2027, of which— “(i) $2,000,000, pursuant to the authority in section 12(f) of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note; Public Law 107–355), shall be used to carry out section 12 of such Act; and “(ii) $12,500,000 shall be used for making grants.
- “(3) UNDERGROUND NATURAL GAS STORAGE FACILITY SAFETY ACCOUNT.—From fees collected under section 60302, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out section 60141 $7,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2027.
- “(4) RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION.—From amounts made available to the Secretary under paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary shall use, to carry out section 104(a) of the PIPES Act of 2023 and section 102(c) of the Protecting our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2020 (Public Law 116–260)— “(A) $3,400,000 for fiscal year 2024, of which— “(i) $2,890,000 shall be from amounts made available under paragraph (1)(A); and “(ii) $510,000 shall be from amounts made available under paragraph (2)(A); “(B) $5,100,000 for fiscal year 2025, of which— “(i) $4,335,000 shall be from amounts made available under paragraph (1)(B); and “(ii) $765,000 shall be from amounts made available under paragraph (2)(B); “(C) $6,800,000 for fiscal year 2026, of which— “(i) $5,780,000 shall be from amounts made available under paragraph (1)(C); and “(ii) $1,020,000 shall be from amounts made available under paragraph (2)(C); and “(D) $8,500,000 for fiscal year 2027, of which— “(i) $7,225,000 shall be from amounts made available under paragraph (1)(D); and “(ii) $1,275,000 shall be from amounts made available under paragraph (2)(D).”. (b) Operational expenses.—Section 2(b) of the PIPES Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–183; 130 Stat. 515) is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (3) and inserting the following: “(1) $31,000,000 for fiscal year 2024. “(2) $32,000,000 for fiscal year 2025.
- “(3) $33,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.
- “(4) $34,000,000 for fiscal year 2027.”
- (c) One-call notification programs.—Section 6107 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “$1,058,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2023” and inserting “$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2027”. (d) Emergency response grants.—Section 60125(b)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “fiscal years 2021 through 2023” and inserting “fiscal years 2024 through 2027”. (e) Pipeline safety information grants to communities.—Section 60130(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2023 to carry out this section.”
- and inserting the following: “, to carry out this section, the following: “(A) $2,250,000 for fiscal year 2024. “(B) $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2025. “(C) $2,750,000 for fiscal year 2026. “(D) $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2027.”. (f) Improving technical assistance.—Section 60130(c)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking “each fiscal year, the Secretary shall award $1,000,000” and inserting “, the Secretary shall award”; and (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting the following: “the following amounts: “(A) $1,250,000 for fiscal year 2024. “(B) $1,500,000 for fiscal year 2025. “(C) $1,750,000 for fiscal year 2026. “(D) $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2027.”. (g) Damage prevention programs.—Section 60134(i) of title 49, United States Code, is amended in the first sentence by striking “$1,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2023” and inserting “$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2027”. (h) Pipeline integrity program.—Section 12(f) of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (49 U.S.C. 60101 note) is amended— (1) by striking “$3,000,000” and inserting “$2,000,000”; and (2) by striking “2021 through 2023” and inserting “2024 through 2027”. ---
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill updates definitions in the legal code to include references to carbon dioxide, such as adding definitions for "carbon dioxide," "carbon dioxide pipeline facility," and distinguishes between interstate and intrastate carbon dioxide pipeline facilities. It also introduces terms like "de-identified," and defines both "non-public pipeline safety data and information" and "public information." Additionally, the bill provides a definition for "Tribal" in the context of Indian Tribes.
4. Workforce development Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows for the hiring of up to 30 more employees with specialized expertise to help develop pipeline safety policies. It also requires the Secretary of Transportation to report to Congress on the progress of hiring efforts and any staffing challenges or needs, and permits waiving certain regulations to implement hiring incentives.
5. Regulatory updates Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses the definition and handling of "outstanding mandates," which are final rules related to pipeline safety that have not yet been published in the Federal Register. It requires the Secretary of Transportation to update the public and Congress every 30 days about these rules' progress, detailing work plans, timelines, and any delays due to resource issues.
6. Incorporation by reference Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires that at least every four years, the Secretary of Transportation reviews and updates the safety standards for federal pipelines, using industry standards where practical. It also mandates maintaining a public list of these standards, explaining any that weren't adopted, and ensuring these standards are freely available online. Within two years, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) will report on compliance with these requirements.
7. Inspection activity reporting Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the requirements for the Secretary of Transportation to publish a report detailing the inspection and enforcement priorities for pipeline safety. This report, available online, will cover the years 2024 to 2027 and explain how these priorities will enhance safety and coordinate with regional offices and state inspectors. Additionally, starting the next year, an annual summary of pipeline inspections, including details such as inspection dates, pipeline operators, and any violations found, must be publicly accessible by June 1.
8. Technical safety standards committees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines amendments to the United States Code regarding technical safety standards committees. It specifies when committee reports should mention standards as applicable, mandates written notifications of reasons for decisions to Congress committees, and changes the frequency of committee meetings from four times a year to two.
9. Sense of Congress on PHMSA engagement prior to rulemaking activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress believes that the Secretary of Transportation should involve pipeline stakeholders and the public before creating new pipeline rules to better understand different viewpoints and speed up the process. In addition, when it could make reviewing public feedback faster, the Administrator should share why certain regulatory decisions are made to help people provide clearer comments.
10. Office of Public Engagement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Transportation is required to rename the Community Liaison Services to the Office of Public Engagement within one year of the Act's enactment. This Office is tasked with educating and engaging the public and stakeholders on pipeline safety, promoting safety programs, providing public information on safety regulations, and assisting with safety inquiries. Additionally, the Office will include community liaison roles and must submit a report to Congress on its progress within 18 months.
11. Class location changes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Transportation must create a final rule within 90 days to update safety standards for class location changes in pipelines, based on a previous proposal from 2020.
12. Pipeline operating status Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendments to Section 60143(b) of title 49, United States Code, as part of the PIPES Act of 2023, require the Secretary to issue a notice about new pipeline safety rules for idled gas and hazardous liquid pipelines within 180 days, also advising that any new regulations should consider existing industry standards.
13. Rights-of-way management Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 60108(a) introduces an optional program allowing pipeline operators to use alternative methods for maintaining rights-of-way if they achieve the same safety standards required by law. These methods can include ecosystem-friendly practices such as integrated vegetation management and promoting habitats for wildlife, as long as they follow existing regulations and seek guidance from relevant authorities or industry best practices.
14. Study on composite materials for pipelines Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Transportation must complete a study within 18 months to evaluate the use of composite materials for pipelines transporting hydrogen and hydrogen mixed with natural gas, considering available materials, tests, and standards. The study process includes public input through meetings and comment periods, and the Secretary will hold a public meeting to present findings before initiating rulemaking to potentially authorize the use of these materials.
15. Competitive Academic Agreement Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that the Secretary of Transportation can offer full financial support to projects by small and mid-sized academic institutions under the Competitive Academic Agreement Program, as long as these institutions submit a written request before receiving the funds. It also mandates the Secretary to report to Congress on the grant recipients, including those who received full funding.
16. Geohazard mitigation study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that the Comptroller General of the United States must create a report within a year, assessing federal and state requirements and industry practices for the safe design and maintenance of pipelines against natural disasters, like earthquakes and floods. Once the report is prepared, it must be submitted to relevant congressional committees and the Secretary of Transportation, along with any recommended actions based on the findings.
17. Special permit program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces changes to how special permits for pipeline safety risks are processed. It requires the Secretary of Transportation to follow specific guidelines for waivers, publish application notices, complete reviews within 18 months, and report to Congress on the implementation and effectiveness of these changes. Additionally, a report by the General Accountability Office will assess compliance with these procedures.
18. Excavation damage prevention Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends U.S. laws to improve excavation damage prevention by requiring State programs to adopt leading practices such as defining excavation activities, requiring the use of technologies to locate underground facilities, and specifying training for excavators. It also mandates reports to Congress on the implementation of these practices and considers various factors, like enforcement of one-call laws and data reporting requirements, when evaluating State damage prevention programs.
19. Integrity management study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Transportation must quickly partner with the National Academies to study the effectiveness of rules managing the safety and integrity of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines. This study will analyze past and current safety measures, consult various stakeholders, and provide a report to Congress within two years.
20. Hydrogen study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a directive for a study by the Comptroller General of the United States on natural gas pipelines with more than 5% hydrogen to identify operational changes and challenges in using hydrogen-natural gas blends. The study will inform future regulations, and results will be reported to Congress within a year, but rulemaking may proceed before the report is submitted.
21. Penalty for causing a defect in or disrupting operation of pipeline infrastructure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill adds penalties for anyone who knowingly causes damage to parts of a pipeline or disrupts the pipeline's operation without authorization. If someone is found guilty of such actions, they could face up to 10 years in prison, a fine, or both.
22. Civil penalties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes to change a part of the United States Code by increasing the maximum civil penalties from $2,000,000 to $2,500,000.
Money References
- SEC. 22.Civil penalties. Section 60122(a)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “$2,000,000” and inserting “$2,500,000”.
23. Liquefied natural gas regulatory coordination Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes a Working Group led by the Secretary of Transportation to improve the coordination and regulation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities, excluding peak shaving facilities, by clarifying the roles of different federal agencies. It mandates that the group create agreements on how to handle safety, avoid conflicts, and coordinate oversight, with a report on their progress to be submitted to Congress.
24. Pipeline safety voluntary information-sharing system Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the United States Code establishes a confidential Voluntary Information-Sharing System (VIS) aimed at improving pipeline safety by encouraging the sharing of safety data among various stakeholders, while ensuring the confidentiality of non-public information. It outlines the governance, management, and confidentiality provisions, specifies reporting obligations, and provides authorization for funding from 2024 to 2027.
Money References
- “(j) Report on VIS.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and make publicly available, a report that includes— “(1) a detailed accounting of the allocation and uses of expenditures authorized under this section; “(2) an estimate of the annual cost to maintain the VIS program, including an assessment and projection of costs associated with the Third-Party Data Manager, data sourcing and storage, data governance, data architecture, data consumption, and the VIS operations and administration by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration; “(3) the methodology for determining the estimate under paragraph (2); “(4) the number of expected participants in the VIS program; “(5) the number of Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration positions needed to maintain the VIS program; “(6) the projected timeline for the implementation of the VIS program to meet the purposes under subsection (a)(2); and “(7) recommendations to ensure sufficient funding for the ongoing activities of the VIS program, including a reasonable fee assessed on authorized participants in the VIS program. “(k) Authorization of appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated for the establishment of a voluntary information-sharing program under this section— “(1) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2024; “(2) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; “(3) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; and “(4) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2027.”. (b) Clerical amendment.—The analysis for chapter 601 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: “60144.Voluntary information-sharing system.”.
60144. Voluntary information-sharing system Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section creates a Voluntary Information-Sharing System (VIS) to enhance pipeline safety by sharing data and lessons learned without penalties. The system will be run by a Governing Board and include contributions from various stakeholders. The data shared is to remain confidential unless it's used for safety improvements, and the system is protected from being used in legal actions or accessed through requests under public records laws.
Money References
- (k) Authorization of appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated for the establishment of a voluntary information-sharing program under this section— (1) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2024; (2) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; (3) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; and (4) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2027. ---
25. Carbon dioxide pipelines Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill amends various sections of title 49, United States Code, to include carbon dioxide pipelines in the regulations that already apply to gas and hazardous liquid pipelines. It sets out requirements for pipeline safety standards, emergency response, and public education, as well as addressing issues like maintenance, inspections, and the use of dispersion modeling to manage the risks associated with carbon dioxide transportation.
26. Opportunity for formal hearing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines amendments to the law that provide respondents in certain enforcement matters relating to transportation an opportunity for a formal hearing before an administrative law judge if the proposed civil penalty or cost of compliance is at least $125,000. It also requires the Secretary of Transportation to establish protocols for public hearings and report on the use and outcomes of the formal hearing process.
Money References
- (a) Enforcement procedures.—Section 60117(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (I) by striking “and” at the end; (2) in subparagraph (J) by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and (3) by adding at the end the following: “(K) allow the respondent an opportunity for a hearing on the record conducted by an administrative law judge, in accordance with section 554 of title 5, for a notice of probable violation enforcement matter— “(i) with a proposed civil penalty of at least $125,000; or “(ii) where the respondent can reasonably show the cost of the proposed compliance action will exceed $125,000.”.
27. State pipeline safety grants reporting Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the United States Code to require that pipeline safety grants reports include a summary of amounts claimed and reimbursed in the past three years, and provide an estimate of the funding needed to cover 80% of program costs for the following year.
28. Inspection of in-service breakout tanks Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that within one year, the Secretary of Transportation must review and possibly update safety standards to allow risk-based inspections of breakout tank bottoms. If these standards are updated, they must be as safe as the current standards and consider guidelines from the American Petroleum Institute's 2014 edition.
29. Disclosure of safety information assessment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Transportation is required to assess how gas, hazardous liquid, and carbon dioxide pipeline facility owners and operators share safety information with the public and emergency responders, considering various factors like regulations, data sharing, and communication methods. After consulting with relevant stakeholders, the Secretary must report findings to Congress and may issue guidance to improve information sharing and pipeline safety.
30. Assessment of certain pipeline safety definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Transportation must evaluate certain pipeline safety definitions within one year to see if they adequately protect buildings and outdoor areas. This includes considering changes to how many people must occupy an area for it to be significant, whether standardizing these numbers would improve safety, and if defining 20 or more persons in an area for at least 50 days a year would enhance safety and efficiency. If needed, the Secretary will update the definitions to better protect against pipeline incidents.
31. Report assessing the costs of pipeline failures Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section requires the Secretary of Transportation to commission a study with the National Academies to examine the costs associated with pipeline failures or shutdowns, including financial impacts, emergency response costs, and the economic effects of such events. The study will involve consulting various stakeholders and experts, and the results will be reported to Congress once completed.
32. Study on localized emergency alert system for pipeline facilities incidents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The document outlines a study that the U.S. Comptroller General must conduct to evaluate the need for a localized emergency alert system for pipeline facilities. This study, due 18 months from the law's enactment, will explore the system's feasibility, coordination with existing alert systems, stakeholder impacts, necessary technology, and legal considerations, ultimately recommending whether federal requirements are needed to implement such a system.
33. Maximum allowable operating pressure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, it outlines changes to the regulations regarding the maximum allowable operating pressure of natural gas transmission pipelines. It establishes a working group to provide recommendations on testing procedures, and mandates that the Secretary of Transportation initiate a rulemaking process to update regulations based on the working group's report.