Overview
Title
To establish a grant program to address the crises in accessing affordable housing and child care through the co-location of housing and child care, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Build Housing with Care Act of 2025" is like giving people money to build places where families can live and have a daycare in the same spot, especially where those are really needed, so it's easier for parents to find a safe place for their kids while they work.
Summary AI
H.R. 646, known as the "Build Housing with Care Act of 2025," aims to establish a grant program that encourages the creation of facilities where affordable housing and child care services are located together. This program, overseen by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, will offer competitive grants up to $10 million to eligible entities like community development organizations, nonprofits, and public housing agencies. Priority will be given to projects in areas lacking child care, low-income communities, or rural locations. The act also mandates a study by the Government Accountability Office on child care access for public housing residents, and authorizes funding for the program through 2030.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the "Build Housing with Care Act of 2025," aims to tackle the issues of affordable housing and child care in the United States by establishing a grant program. This initiative intends to finance projects that co-locate housing and child care services, making them more accessible and affordable, especially in areas that need them the most, such as child care deserts, low-income areas, and rural communities. The bill allocates significant financial resources over several years to support eligible organizations working on these dual-purpose facilities.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the bill, particularly regarding its execution and potential impact. Notably, the purpose statement is broad and lacks specific details, raising concerns about the effective use and monitoring of funds. The definition of "co-location" is somewhat ambiguous, potentially leading to varied interpretations and inconsistent application of the grant program across different regions.
The grant cap of $10 million per entity could result in excessive spending without guidelines on scalability or value, risking inefficient use of taxpayer money. Furthermore, the phrase "or other appropriate entity as determined by the Secretary" in the grant allocation section introduces vagueness that might lead to favoritism, thus impacting the program's transparency.
The bill also proposes significant financial resources—$100 million annually—for a period without requiring periodic evaluation, which could lead to ineffective use of funds if the program's cost-effectiveness is not regularly assessed.
Additionally, while the GAO study aims to provide insight into child care access for public housing residents, it lacks specific metrics for assessing affordability, which could result in ambiguous findings.
Impact on the Public
If implemented effectively, the bill could significantly increase the availability of both affordable housing and child care services. By co-locating these services, the bill seeks to reduce logistical burdens on families, offering more convenience and potentially lowering costs. This could greatly benefit low-income families, who often struggle with access to affordable child care options, allowing parents to work or pursue education.
However, the vagueness and lack of specificity in certain sections might hinder the program's overall effectiveness. Without stringent monitoring and clear definitions, the risk of misallocated funds could undermine public confidence in the program's ability to genuinely address these crises.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Low-Income Families: These families stand to benefit the most as the bill aims to make both housing and child care more accessible and affordable. By increasing the availability of these co-located facilities, low-income families might find it easier to balance work and family responsibilities.
Child Care Providers and Housing Developers: Providers and developers could find new opportunities to expand services and meet community needs through grants. However, they may also face challenges navigating the complex application and reporting requirements imposed by the bill.
Government and Oversight Bodies: Agencies like HUD and GAO will need to enforce and manage these efforts carefully to ensure transparency, accountability, and efficient use of taxpayer money. The lack of specific directives in the bill could complicate their efforts.
Community Development Organizations: These entities, which play a significant role in local development, could leverage grant funding to create sustainable community projects. However, they may face increased administrative burdens due to the detailed application process.
Overall, while the bill proposes significant, potentially transformative solutions to entrenched social issues, its effectiveness will largely depend on the clarity of its implementation guidelines and the rigor of its oversight.
Financial Assessment
Financial Summary and Allocations
The "Build Housing with Care Act of 2025" introduces a grant program focusing on the co-location of affordable housing and child care facilities, with significant financial implications. The bill authorizes up to $10 million in grants per eligible entity, allowing a substantial investment into individual projects. This funding is intended to facilitate the design, construction, and operation of these integrated facilities. Additionally, the bill provides for an overarching authorization of $100 million annually from 2025 through 2030 to support the program.
Issues with Financial Allocations
The financial allocations and spending limits in the bill are generous but raise several concerns:
Grant Cap Concerns: The cap of $10 million per eligible entity could lead to excessive spending without clear measures of scalability or justification of value. There is a risk that these funds could be misused if the criteria for awarding these grants aren't stringently applied, which might result in projects that are not cost-effective or fail to sufficiently meet program goals.
Broad Authorization: Authorizing $100 million annually for five years, totaling $500 million, is a considerable fiscal commitment. Given this substantial allocation, the absence of mandated periodic evaluations within the legislative text is notable. This could lead to ineffective use of taxpayer money if the program's effectiveness and cost efficiency are not continuously assessed.
Ambiguity in Allocation: The language "or other appropriate entity as determined by the Secretary" in section 3(e)(2) introduces ambiguity regarding which entities may receive distributed funds. This could potentially allow favoritism and reduce fairness in the program’s implementation unless further clarified.
Evaluating 'Child Care Deserts': Defining "child care desert" as a criterion for prioritizing grants introduces challenges, particularly if practical identification lacks clear guidance or criteria. This vagueness could impact the fair distribution of grants, potentially favoring certain areas over others without consistent justification.
Relation to Identified Issues
These financial allocations relate closely to several issues highlighted in the identified list:
Potential for Misuse or Misappropriation: The broad purpose statement and vague definitions may not provide sufficient guidance on how the funds should be used, increasing the risk of financial mismanagement.
Bureaucratic Inefficiencies: The consultations required among various departments to develop the program could introduce bureaucratic inefficiencies, impacting how funds are allocated and managed.
Transparency and Fairness: Vague terms and potential favoritism in allocation could undermine the program’s transparency and fairness, particularly in how financial resources are distributed to eligible entities.
Overall, while the financial allocations within the "Build Housing with Care Act of 2025" provide ample opportunity for addressing housing and child care needs, the concerns outlined suggest that greater specificity and accountability measures could enhance the program's effectiveness and ensure that allocated funds achieve their intended impact.
Issues
The purpose statement in Section 2 is broad and may lack sufficient detail to ensure funds are used effectively towards the stated goals, potentially leading to misuse or misappropriation of funds.
The definition of 'co-location' in Section 2 could be vague, leading to ambiguity in how housing and child care providers are combined, which could result in inconsistent applications of the grant program.
The grant cap of $10,000,000 per eligible entity in Section 3 may lead to excessive spending without clear stipulations on scalability or value justification, potentially resulting in misuse of funds.
The phrase 'or other appropriate entity as determined by the Secretary' in Section 3(e)(2) is vague and could allow for favoritism in grant allocation, affecting fairness and transparency.
The required consultations in Section 3(b) do not specify how conflicts between departments' recommendations will be resolved, possibly leading to bureaucratic inefficiencies.
Section 3(h) authorizes $100 million annually from 2025 to 2030, a substantial allocation without mandated periodic evaluation for cost-effectiveness, risking ineffective use of taxpayer money.
The term 'child care desert' is defined in Section 3(i)(3), but its practical identification may require more guidance or criteria for consistency and fairness, impacting the fair distribution of grants.
The GAO study in Section 4 lacks specific metrics for evaluating the availability and affordability of child care, which could lead to ambiguous or inconsistent findings.
Section 4(a)(1) lacks explicit criteria for 'eligible child care providers,' potentially leading to confusion about eligibility for funds, affecting transparency and fairness.
The term 'cost-burdened' in Section 4(a)(3)(A) relies on a definition by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, subject to change and potentially affecting consistency and fair assessment.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill specifies its short title, which is "Build Housing with Care Act of 2025."
2. Purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The purpose of this Act is to make housing and child care more affordable by creating a grant program. This program will encourage providers to offer both housing and child care services in the same location.
3. Housing and child care provider co-location grant program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Housing and Child Care Provider Co-Location Grant Program is designed to give grants to eligible organizations to help create facilities that combine housing with child care services. The program, managed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, prioritizes projects in areas lacking child care, low-income communities, and rural areas, with the goal of making child care accessible and maintaining housing for families.
Money References
- (2) GRANT AMOUNTS.—An eligible entity may be awarded not more than $10,000,000 under this Act.
- (h) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2030.
4. GAO study and report regarding child care access for residents of public housing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The GAO is conducting a study to understand how affordable child care is for people living in public housing. They will look at how existing programs help, how much of residents' income goes to child care, and how laws might make it hard to set up child care facilities. Additionally, they will evaluate the impact of tax credits and other federal assistance on helping these residents afford child care and essential expenses, and will provide recommendations to improve child care access and awareness of available federal programs.