Overview

Title

An Act To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to require the Secretary of the Interior to include the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultations regarding designations of critical minerals, elements, substances, and materials.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6395 is like making sure that when picking important rocks and materials for our country, the people who care about keeping us healthy (the Secretary of Health and Human Services) are also part of the conversation, so everyone stays safe and well.

Summary AI

H. R. 6395 is a bill that aims to amend the Energy Act of 2020 by requiring the Secretary of the Interior to involve the Secretary of Health and Human Services in discussions about the designation of critical minerals, elements, substances, and materials. This change is intended to consider health-related factors when identifying these essential resources. The bill acknowledges the importance of these materials in healthcare by amending specific sections of the original Energy Act to include consultation with the Health and Human Services department.

Published

2024-12-27
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: JOINT
Status: Enrolled Bill
Date: 2024-12-27
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6395enr

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
172
Pages:
1
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 50
Verbs: 8
Adjectives: 4
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 15
Entities: 20

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.96
Average Sentence Length:
21.50
Token Entropy:
4.20
Readability (ARI):
11.20

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

H.R. 6395, known as the "Recognizing the Importance of Critical Minerals in Healthcare Act of 2023," is a legislative proposal aimed at amending the Energy Act of 2020. The amendment mandates the inclusion of the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultations regarding the designation of critical minerals, elements, substances, and materials. Prior to this change, such consultations included the Secretary of Agriculture. By integrating health considerations into the evaluation of critical minerals, the bill intends to address potential impacts on public health and integrate this perspective into the decision-making process.

Significant Issues

One of the main issues with this bill is the clarity and accessibility of its language. While the bill pertains to important sectors such as energy and health, the legal references (specifically 30 U.S.C. 1606(c)(4)(C) and (5)(A)) may be difficult for an average reader to decipher without background knowledge regarding the Energy Act of 2020. This complexity could result in confusion about the precise roles and scope of responsibilities for the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Additionally, the bill’s impact on administrative costs and operational processes remains vague. There is no indication of whether this new requirement would impose significant financial burdens or necessitate adjustments in administrative functions. The lack of such details might lead to concerns from budget-conscious lawmakers and constituents who prioritize economic efficiency.

Public Impact

For the general public, this bill signifies a step toward ensuring that the health implications of critical minerals are duly considered in national mineral policy. Critical minerals often play an essential role in various industries, including healthcare, where they are used in life-saving medical technologies and pharmaceuticals. By involving the Department of Health and Human Services in consultations, the government acknowledges the interplay between mineral resources and public health, potentially leading to more informed and balanced policy decisions.

Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders within the mineral extraction and energy sectors, the integration of health-focused considerations could lead to more comprehensive regulatory frameworks and possibly more stringent requirements. This could either benefit or challenge these industries, depending on how such considerations impact operational and compliance costs.

On the other hand, the healthcare sector might view this development positively. The proactive involvement of health authorities in mineral-related discussions ensures that the healthcare sector's material needs are adequately addressed and that emerging health-related challenges linked to mineral availability are highlighted and managed.

In governmental terms, this shift reemphasizes the role of inter-agency collaboration, encouraging greater cohesion between departments that manage natural resources and those focused on public welfare. It could lead to more holistic government strategies, though potentially at the cost of increased bureaucracy and resource allocation for these consultations.

In summary, while the "Recognizing the Importance of Critical Minerals in Healthcare Act of 2023" introduces an essential focus on health within the realm of mineral policy, it brings with it questions regarding implementation clarity and potential financial implications. Its broader societal impact has the potential to enhance public health-focused decision-making in the essential area of critical resource management, albeit with considerations for potential complexity in execution and policymaking processes.

Issues

  • The amendment described in Section 2 might lack clarity and transparency for those unfamiliar with the Energy Act of 2020, especially regarding why the inclusion of the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultations about critical minerals is essential. This could create political and public debate over the necessity and expected outcomes of this change.

  • The legal references in Section 2 (30 U.S.C. 1606(c)(4)(C) and (5)(A)) may be complex, making it difficult for lay readers to fully understand the legal implications and the specific roles and responsibilities outlined in the bill. This could lead to confusion about how the amendment will be implemented.

  • The potential operational or policy impacts of mandating consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services are not clearly articulated. Without a detailed explanation of the expected outcomes, stakeholders might question the practical effects of this legislation, including any shifts in priority or focus within the affected departments.

  • There is an absence of discussion in the bill about financial implications or potential increases in administrative costs associated with this new consultation requirement. This omission may raise concerns among budget-conscious representatives and members of the public regarding the financial efficiency and impact of this legislative change.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states that the official name for the law is the "Recognizing the Importance of Critical Minerals in Healthcare Act of 2023."

2. Required consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill amends the Energy Act of 2020 by requiring that any consultation mentioned in specific parts of the Act must now also include the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in addition to the Secretary of Agriculture.