Overview
Title
To require owners of covered federally assisted rental dwelling units to install temperature sensors in such units, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Housing Temperature Safety Act of 2025" wants to make sure homes with government help have good temperatures, like not too hot or cold. It suggests using special devices to check temperatures in those homes for three years to see if it helps everyone feel better.
Summary AI
H.R. 638, known as the "Housing Temperature Safety Act of 2025," aims to ensure that federally assisted rental housing units maintain appropriate indoor temperatures. The bill proposes a 3-year pilot program where grants are given to public housing agencies and owners to install temperature sensors in these units. The program will test the effectiveness of these sensors, collect data on temperature-related complaints, and ensure participant diversity across various housing types and regions. The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is responsible for setting standards and evaluating the program's results, including addressing any barriers like internet access and tenant participation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed piece of legislation, known as the "Housing Temperature Safety Act of 2025," aims to introduce a pilot program requiring the installation of temperature sensors in federally assisted rental housing units. The purpose of this program is to ensure that these accommodations meet certain temperature compliance standards. The bill involves collecting data regarding temperature-related issues to evaluate the sensors' effectiveness and determine any obstacles in implementing these technologies, such as internet connectivity.
Summary of Significant Issues
One major concern with this bill is the lack of clearly defined funding limits, as it states that "such sums as may be necessary" will be appropriated. This vagueness could lead to unchecked spending and financial mismanagement. There is also a six-month delay in defining what constitutes "temperature-related complaints and violations," which could result in legal ambiguities and inconsistent application of the law.
The requirement for tenant permission to install temperature sensors poses another issue. This component of the bill could slow its roll-out if tenants refuse to participate, raising questions about privacy and consent. Additionally, the notion of "full utility of temperature sensor capabilities" is not clearly articulated, which could complicate the assessment of the program's success.
The bill’s reliance on data gathered from different types of temperature sensors across various climates lacks standardized comparison metrics, potentially affecting the reliability of the evaluations. The language of the bill is quite technical, which presents understanding and compliance challenges for stakeholders involved in its execution.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, the bill could positively impact public welfare by potentially improving living conditions in federally assisted housing units, especially in regions where extreme temperatures are common. The installation of temperature sensors could lead to a more consistent enforcement of temperature regulations, thereby enhancing the quality of life for residents.
However, the lack of specific funding and evaluation criteria could lead to inefficient use of resources, which might not meet public expectations for accountability in the spending of public funds. The ambiguity surrounding terms like "temperature-related complaints and violations" and "full utility of temperature sensor capabilities" may cause confusion and result in uneven enforcement.
Specific stakeholders such as public housing agencies, non-profit organizations involved in housing, and tenants may experience a mixed impact. Housing agencies might face challenges in implementing this bill due to logistical complexities and the requirement for tenant consent. Non-profit organizations could see it as a new opportunity for involvement in public infrastructure projects that aim to improve tenant welfare. For tenants, while there might be privacy concerns regarding data collection from installed temperature sensors, the potential benefits in enhanced living conditions could prove beneficial.
In essence, while the bill targets significant improvements in housing conditions, the execution plan raises several practical and ethical concerns that necessitate careful consideration and clarity in the legislative framework.
Issues
The absence of specific appropriation amounts specified under SEC. 2. (h) Authorization of appropriations, where only 'such sums as may be necessary' are mentioned, could lead to budget overruns and unchecked spending, raising concerns over financial transparency and accountability.
The definition of 'temperature-related complaints and violations' is to be determined 180 days post-enactment in SEC. 2. (d)(2), creating a gap in clarity for participants at the outset, which could legalize inconsistencies in enforcement and expectations.
The requirement for resident permission for sensor installation as detailed in SEC. 2. (c) might impede the program’s implementation if tenants refuse participation, posing an ethical issue regarding tenant consent and privacy.
The bill text lacks detailed information about implementing and funding (SEC. 1., Short title), raising potential issues regarding spending efficiency and causing ambiguity over which entities may disproportionately benefit.
The term 'full utility of temperature sensor capabilities' in SEC. 2. (f)(1)(B) and SEC. 2. (f)(2)(B) is vague and may not clearly define successful outcomes, causing potential challenges in assessing program efficacy.
Without standardized procedures for data disaggregation by 'temperature sensor technology and climate region' as mentioned in SEC. 2. (f)(1)(A) and SEC. 2. (f)(2)(A), evaluations may struggle with consistency issues, impacting the reliability of the findings.
The pilot program could result in wasteful spending if temperature sensors do not yield significant improvements in compliance or tenant satisfaction, as concerns in SEC. 2. show, due to the experimental nature and undefined performance benchmarks.
Complex language throughout the bill, such as in SEC. 2., could be difficult for stakeholders to understand promptly, affecting compliance and implementation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section gives the official name of the bill as the "Housing Temperature Safety Act of 2025."
2. Temperature Sensor Pilot Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text describes a 3-year pilot program initiated by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to install temperature sensors in federally assisted rental units. The program aims to ensure compliance with temperature requirements and involves collecting data on temperature-related issues, evaluating sensor efficacy, and assessing barriers to sensor utility.