Overview

Title

To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to review and make certain revisions to the Standard Occupational Classification System, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The 911 SAVES Act asks a special office to change how they label the people who answer emergency calls, like 911, so it shows how important and brave their job is.

Summary AI

H. R. 637, known as the “Supporting Accurate Views of Emergency Services Act of 2025” or the “911 SAVES Act”, aims to reclassify Public Safety Telecommunicators as a Protective Service Occupation in the Standard Occupational Classification System. The bill highlights the critical role these professionals play in emergency responses and seeks to accurately reflect their responsibilities and the risks they face. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is required to make this classification change within 30 days of the act's enactment.

Published

2025-01-22
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-22
Package ID: BILLS-119hr637ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
718
Pages:
4
Sentences:
27

Language

Nouns: 238
Verbs: 71
Adjectives: 39
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 20
Entities: 53

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.90
Average Sentence Length:
26.59
Token Entropy:
5.13
Readability (ARI):
18.60

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 637, known as the "Supporting Accurate Views of Emergency Services Act of 2025" or the "911 SAVES Act," is a legislative proposal introduced in the 119th Congress. The bill seeks to require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review and revise the classification of Public Safety Telecommunicators under the Standard Occupational Classification System within 30 days of its enactment. Specifically, it aims to reclassify them as Protective Service Occupations, acknowledging their critical role in emergency services.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the notable issues with the bill is the potentially unrealistic deadline imposed for the reclassification process. The OMB is mandated to complete the categorization within 30 days, which might not provide sufficient time for a comprehensive review and thoughtful implementation.

Additionally, the bill lacks detailed information about the potential cost implications of this reclassification. This omission raises concerns about budget and resource allocation, both important considerations for policymakers and the public. Moreover, it remains unclear how this change in classification would impact the roles and responsibilities of Public Safety Telecommunicators.

The bill's short title, "911 SAVES Act," introduces another point of confusion, as it does not clarify the acronym "SAVES." This could lead to misunderstandings about the bill’s objectives.

Impact on the Public

The reclassification of Public Safety Telecommunicators as Protective Service Occupations could bring about several broad impacts. It symbolizes a formal recognition of their essential role in emergency management and public safety, potentially enhancing their professional standing and possibly leading to improved working conditions and mental health support.

However, without clear details on the costing and implementation process, there might be unintended financial consequences. The lack of detailed explanation regarding the transition process could also result in ambiguity in the public's understanding of the change's benefits.

Potential Impact on Stakeholders

For Public Safety Telecommunicators, being reclassified under Protective Service Occupations recognizes the complexity and critical nature of their work, potentially leading to opportunities for better pay, benefits, and working conditions. Furthermore, it could result in increased access to mental health resources, acknowledging the exposure to traumatic situations they endure.

On the policymaking front, the bill’s rapid timeline and lack of cost detail might pose challenges. Stakeholders responsible for budget allocations and human resource management within emergency services could find themselves pressed to reconcile existing frameworks with the new classification.

Overall, while the bill's intention appears to underscore the significance of Public Safety Telecommunicators' contributions, the outlined issues suggest a need for detailed planning and transparent communication to ensure effective implementation and alignment with existing occupational standards.

Issues

  • The deadline for the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to categorize public safety telecommunicators as a protective service occupation within 30 days of enactment may be too short for thorough consideration and implementation, raising concerns about the feasibility and adequacy of the review process. (Section 3)

  • The bill does not provide detailed information about potential cost implications of reclassifying public safety telecommunicators, which could affect budget and resource allocation, a concern for both the public and policymakers. (Section 3)

  • The short title of the Act, '911 SAVES Act,' lacks an explanation of the acronym 'SAVES,' making it unclear how it relates to the Act's intent or objectives. This may confuse readers and stakeholders trying to understand the bill's purpose. (Section 1)

  • There is no detailed explanation in the bill of how the reclassification will impact the roles and responsibilities of public safety telecommunicators, potentially leaving unclear how their work conditions might change. (Sections 2 and 3)

  • The language of the bill does not specify what criteria or process will be used to ensure the reclassification aligns with the broader goals of the Standard Occupational Classification System, which could lead to inconsistencies in classification standards. (Section 3)

  • The findings provide a strong emphasis on the role and impact of Public Safety Telecommunicators but could benefit from explicitly linking the discussion to the proposed classification change earlier, enhancing coherence and clarity on the need for the legislative action. (Section 2)

  • The bill does not include a summary or conclusion in the findings that ties together the rationale for the proposed reclassification with the evidence presented, potentially weakening the persuasive power of the argument. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the short title for the act, stating that it may be referred to as the “Supporting Accurate Views of Emergency Services Act of 2025” or simply the “911 SAVES Act.”

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress acknowledges the essential and multifaceted role of Public Safety Telecommunicators in emergency situations, highlighting their crucial contributions to public safety and advocating for their job classification to reflect their protective services role accurately. This reclassification aims to recognize their lifesaving work and align their occupational status with related systems.

3. Review of Standard Occupational Classification System Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is required, within 30 days of this law being enacted, to classify public safety telecommunicators as a category of protective service jobs under the Standard Occupational Classification System.