Overview

Title

To assist Tribal governments in the management of buffalo and buffalo habitat and the reestablishment of buffalo on Indian land.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6368 is a bill that helps Native American tribes take care of buffalo and their homes on their land by providing support from the government, like money and advice, until 2030. It also makes sure that important tribal information is kept safe.

Summary AI

H.R. 6368, known as the "Indian Buffalo Management Act," is designed to aid Tribal governments in managing and restoring buffalo and their habitats on Indian lands. The bill establishes a program within the Department of the Interior to support Tribal efforts in managing buffalo, including offering contracts, grants, and technical assistance. It also allows for the transfer of surplus buffalo from federal lands to Indian lands and ensures that sensitive Tribal information is protected. The program is set to sunset on September 30, 2030, without affecting existing treaty rights.

Published

2024-06-27
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-06-27
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6368rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
7
Words:
1,389
Pages:
10
Sentences:
28

Language

Nouns: 456
Verbs: 112
Adjectives: 51
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 67
Entities: 101

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.35
Average Sentence Length:
49.61
Token Entropy:
5.01
Readability (ARI):
27.24

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Indian Buffalo Management Act" (H.R. 6368), aims to support Tribal governments in managing buffalo and their habitats on Indian lands. The bill outlines a framework through which the Secretary of the Interior will establish a program to aid Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations in developing the capacity to conserve, manage, and enhance buffalo populations. The bill also addresses how buffalo from federal land can be transferred to Indian land and protects Tribal information deemed culturally sensitive or proprietary.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary concerns with the bill lies in the lack of detailed criteria for awarding contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements to Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations. This lack of specificity might lead to favoritism or inefficient allocation of resources. Additionally, the bill does not outline a clear oversight mechanism to ensure that the program is efficient and effective, which could lead to potential misuse of resources.

The definition of "Indian land" and other terms necessitates cross-referencing several legal texts, which could be confusing for non-experts and create legal ambiguities. Moreover, the term "maximum practicable benefit" in relation to resource management is vague, potentially leading to disputes about what benefits are being targeted or achieved.

Concerns also arise from Section 5, which protects sensitive Tribal information. While well-intentioned, the lack of clear criteria or mechanisms for resolving disputes over what constitutes protected information could lead to inconsistent application.

Furthermore, the language regarding consultation with Tribes lacks clarity on the scope and frequency of such engagements, which raises concerns about the adequacy of stakeholder involvement. The absence of specific budgeting or funding sources also raises flags regarding potential fiscal mismanagement or inability to effectively implement the bill's intentions.

Impact on the Public Broadly

Broadly, the bill endeavors to support Tribal sovereignty and economic development through buffalo management and related activities. If effectively implemented, it could have ecological benefits by restoring buffalo populations and habitats, which may also boost local economies through tourism and buffalo-related commerce. However, without clear budgeting and oversight, there is a risk of inefficiency and improper use of resources, which would impact taxpayers indirectly.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations, the bill could provide significant opportunities for cultural preservation, economic growth, and revitalization of traditional practices associated with buffalo. The emphasis on consultation and the inclusion of Tribal expertise in decision-making reflect a step towards honoring Tribal sovereignty and acknowledging Indigenous knowledge systems.

However, the subjective criteria and potential legal ambiguities may pose challenges for Tribes and organizations seeking to fully realize these opportunities. Smaller or less experienced organizations might find it difficult to meet program requirements without clear guidelines or support, potentially exacerbating inequalities among Tribes.

Furthermore, conservationists and ecologists might view the reestablishment of buffalo populations as a positive stride towards ecological restoration. Yet, they may also express concerns if the lack of clarity in the bill leads to ineffective environmental management or if regulations supporting these efforts conflict with established conservation laws.

In summary, while the Indian Buffalo Management Act holds the promise of empowering Tribal governments and fostering economic and cultural benefits, the bill requires clearer definitions, criteria, and accountability mechanisms to ensure its successful implementation and to address the concerns of various stakeholders effectively.

Issues

  • The criteria for awarding contracts, cooperative agreements, or grants to Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations in Section 3 are not clearly outlined, which could lead to favoritism or lack of transparency.

  • The lack of specific budget or funding source mentioned in Sections 3 and 4 raises concerns about potential wasteful spending or budget overruns.

  • The term 'maximum practicable benefit' in Section 3(a)(3) is vague and open to interpretation, which could lead to disputes or misuse of resources.

  • The definition of 'Indian land' in Section 2 references multiple legal texts, which can be confusing and may require additional legal interpretation and resources.

  • The section on 'Protection of information' (Section 5) lacks clear criteria or mechanisms for disputes, potentially leading to inconsistent applications or legal challenges.

  • Legal ambiguities could arise from the use of 'notwithstanding any other provision of law' in Section 5, potentially conflicting with other existing laws.

  • The absence of a specific oversight or accountability mechanism in Section 3 might affect the evaluation of the program's effectiveness and the use of resources.

  • The requirement for 'Tribal organization' experience in Section 2 is somewhat subjective and may benefit from more specific criteria to avoid ambiguity and ensure fair participation.

  • The language regarding 'consultation' in Section 4 is vague and does not define the scope, frequency, or objectives, raising concerns of insufficient stakeholder involvement.

  • The absence of clear oversight or accountability mechanisms in Section 6 for the disposal of surplus buffalo may lead to unregulated or inconsistent practices.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this bill states that it will be officially known as the "Indian Buffalo Management Act."

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text provides definitions for terms used in the Act, including "buffalo" as a type of bison, "buffalo habitat" on Indian land, "Department" referring to the Department of the Interior, and "Indian Tribe" and "Tribal organization" according to their respective legal meanings. The "Secretary" is defined as the Secretary of the Interior, and "Indian land" refers specially to land as defined in a specified legal context.

3. Buffalo resource management Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is required to create a program within the Department to help Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations manage buffalo and their habitats, enhance buffalo populations, and participate in decision-making about buffalo. The Secretary can make contracts, agreements, and award grants to these Tribes, and must also provide technical assistance to support restoration and management activities, with the program scheduled to end on September 30, 2030.

4. Consultation; coordination Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the Secretary must consult with Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations about initiatives affecting buffalo and their habitats. It also mandates the development of a policy for managing buffalo on Indian land, adhering to Tribal-approved management programs and laws.

5. Protection of information Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that the Secretary is prohibited from sharing any information given by an Indian Tribe or Tribal organization if it is labeled as culturally sensitive, proprietary, or confidential.

6. Buffalo from Federal land Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Secretary to make agreements with Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations to move surplus buffalo from federal land to Indian land. Tribes can apply to receive these buffalo, and the Secretary has the authority to waive any fees associated with the buffalo transfer.

7. Treaty rights retained Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section ensures that the Act does not change or take away any treaty rights belonging to Indian Tribes.