Overview
Title
An Act To direct the Secretary of State to avoid or minimize the acquisition or lease of a consular or diplomatic post built or owned by an entity owned or controlled by the Government of the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 6306 is a rule that tries to stop the U.S. from using buildings for embassies or consulates if those buildings are made or owned by companies controlled by China. If this rule is ever broken, the U.S. must explain why keeping the country's safety was more important.
Summary AI
H.R. 6306, also known as the "Embassy Construction Integrity Act of 2023," aims to prevent the U.S. Secretary of State from acquiring or leasing consular or diplomatic buildings that have been built or owned by entities controlled by the Chinese government. The bill requires the Secretary to notify Congress if any exceptions are made to this rule and to justify such decisions based on national security interests. It defines "covered buildings" as those used by U.S. personnel located outside the United States and "covered entities" as those significantly controlled by the Chinese government.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The Embassy Construction Integrity Act of 2023, introduced as H. R. 6306, is designed to reinforce national security by directing the U.S. Secretary of State to avoid or minimize the acquisition or lease of consular or diplomatic posts associated with entities linked to the Government of the People’s Republic of China. Specifically, the bill seeks to restrict involvement with buildings that are either owned or constructed by such entities. Additionally, the bill mandates the Secretary of State to notify relevant congressional committees of any agreements that might go against these restrictions and consider the national security implications of such actions.
Significant Issues
This legislative proposal brings forth several notable issues:
Narrow Definition of 'Covered Entity': The bill focuses narrowly on entities associated with the Chinese government, potentially overlooking risks from other foreign adversaries. This might limit its effectiveness in addressing broader international security concerns.
Ambiguity in Security Standards: The bill lacks clearly defined criteria for what constitutes a "national security interest," leading to potential inconsistencies in how decisions are made and justified by the Secretary of State.
Lack of Accountability: There's no specified consequence for failing to notify Congress within the specified 7-day window, which may weaken legislative oversight and accountability.
Ambiguity in 'Substantial Control': The term "substantial control" regarding ownership and control by entities associated with the Chinese government is not clearly defined, leaving it open to varied interpretation and application.
Evaluation of Mitigation Efforts: The act lacks a mechanism to evaluate whether actions taken to mitigate national security risks are effective.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The broader public may perceive this bill as a necessary step towards enhancing national security by safeguarding sensitive consular and diplomatic facilities from foreign influence, particularly from a major geopolitical rival such as China. This could potentially increase public confidence in the integrity and security of U.S. diplomatic operations abroad.
For specific stakeholders such as the U.S. State Department, the bill poses the challenge of adhering to its stipulations while balancing diplomatic relations and operational needs. The new restrictions could impose additional logistical hurdles, especially in regions where building options are limited and entities linked to the Chinese government are significant players in the construction market.
On the other hand, businesses with ties to the Chinese government might face negative impacts, as they could be precluded from participating in bidding or contracts involving U.S. diplomatic premises, potentially affecting their market opportunities and revenue streams.
In summary, while the bill aims to fortify national security, its narrow focus and lack of specific guidelines may lead to challenges in implementation and enforcement. Greater clarity and broader considerations could enhance its effectiveness in securing U.S. interests on an international scale.
Issues
The definition of a 'covered entity' in Section 2 might be too narrowly focused on entities linked to the Government of the People's Republic of China, potentially overlooking threats from entities controlled by other foreign governments or adversaries, which could have significant national security implications.
The criteria for determining what constitutes a 'national security interest' under subsection (b)(2)(A) of Section 2 are not clearly defined, which may lead to subjective interpretation and variable implementation by the Secretary of State.
There is no specified accountability or consequence mechanism in subsection (b)(1) of Section 2 if the Secretary of State fails to notify the relevant congressional committees within the specified 7-day period, potentially weakening legislative oversight.
The term 'substantial control' in the definition of 'covered entity' in Section 2 is ambiguous and could lead to differing interpretations, which might affect the consistent application of restrictions across different cases.
Section 2 lacks a clear mechanism or authority for evaluating the effectiveness of any mitigation actions taken to address national security vulnerabilities arising from 'inconsistent actions', potentially undermining efforts to protect national interests.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill states the official name of the act, which is the "Embassy Construction Integrity Act of 2023."
2. Restrictions on consular and diplomatic posts built or owned by certain entities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section focuses on preventing the U.S. government from acquiring or leasing buildings related to consular or diplomatic posts if they involve construction by or have ownership links to entities significantly controlled by the Chinese government. The Secretary of State is required to notify Congress about any agreements that might not follow these restrictions and consider national security implications.