Overview
Title
An Act To ratify and approve all authorizations, permits, verifications, extensions, biological opinions, incidental take statements, and any other approvals or orders issued pursuant to Federal law necessary for the establishment and administration of the Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 6285 is a bill that wants to make it easier and faster for people to look for and get oil in Alaska by saying it's okay to do things they already asked to do, even if some people are worried about the environment. It also tries to stop rules that would make it harder to find oil there.
Summary AI
H.R. 6285, titled the "Alaska’s Right to Produce Act of 2023," is aimed at solidifying the management and development of the Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program. The bill ratifies and approves all necessary federal permissions for this program and prohibits any actions that would halt oil and gas leasing in the area. It mandates the reissuance of canceled leases and requires a second lease sale by the end of 2024. Additionally, it nullifies certain federal agency actions restricting the program and limits the expansion of Special Areas in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska without Congressional approval.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 6285, also referred to as the "Alaska's Right to Produce Act of 2023," aims to ratify and validate numerous authorizations and permits necessary to establish and administer an oil and gas leasing program in the Coastal Plain. The bill seeks to ensure that previous approvals related to oil and gas activities in this Alaskan region remain in force, despite any moratoria or cancellations attempted by the Executive Branch. By doing so, it formally approves these measures and mandates the continuation of associated activities. Moreover, the bill nullifies several federal agency actions and orders related to environmental protection and management, primarily affecting the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska.
Significant Issues
The bill highlights several contentious issues concerning environmental protection and administrative power:
Cancellation of Leases by the Department of the Interior: One of the significant issues arises from the bill's claim that the Department of the Interior lacks congressional authority to cancel oil and gas leases. This raises legal concerns about the separation of powers and agency authority.
Environmental Concerns: H.R. 6285 nullifies moratoria on oil and gas leasing without considering potential ecological impacts, which might be perceived as prioritizing the oil and gas industry over environmental protection.
Judicial Review Constraints: The bill limits judicial oversight on actions related to the leasing program, which may reduce transparency and accountability, threatening public trust and oversight.
Nullification of Prior Orders: It nullifies parts of Executive Order 13990 and Secretarial Order 3401, both aimed at conserving environmental resources, without providing clear alternative frameworks to replace these protections.
Complex Legal References: The definitions section heavily references other legal documents, complicating public understanding of the bill’s implications.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The bill's focus on ratifying oil and gas activities in the Coastal Plain is poised to have significant environmental and economic impacts. The legislative push to promote energy development might contribute to economic growth and energy independence, potentially benefiting the national economy by increasing domestic oil and gas production. However, this might come at the cost of environmental degradation and could affect public lands meant for conservation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Energy Industry: Undoubtedly, the oil and gas industry stands to benefit from this bill through the removal of obstacles to lease acquisitions and development. Companies will gain a clearer path to operate in profitable areas, enhancing business operations and financial outcomes.
Environmental Groups: Conversely, environmental organizations might view this bill as a setback. By curbing judicial review and nullifying environmental regulations, the bill could limit efforts to uphold environmental protections, presenting challenges to conserving protected lands and wildlife.
Alaskan Communities: Residents and local businesses in Alaska may experience mixed outcomes. On the one hand, increased oil and gas activities could lead to job creation and boost the local economy. On the other hand, potential ecological damage might detrimentally affect tourism and fisheries, critical components of Alaska's economy.
In conclusion, while the bill attempts to streamline and reinforce oil and gas activities in Alaska's Coastal Plain, it raises substantial concerns about agency authority, environmental protection, and transparency that deserve thoughtful consideration and response from policymakers, stakeholders, and the public.
Issues
The section on Congressional findings (Section 2) raises the issue of the Department of the Interior canceling Coastal Plain leases, which is a major economic and political decision that Congress claims was not delegated to the Secretary. This might have legal implications and needs to be reviewed to ensure compliance with legislative intent.
The Congressional approval of orders (Section 4) nullifies any moratorium on oil and gas leasing without considering potential environmental and public health impacts, causing concerns about favoring the oil and gas industry over environmental protections.
The Judicial review section (Section 5(e)) limits court jurisdiction to review actions related to the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program, potentially reducing transparency and accountability, which is a significant concern for public oversight.
The section on Nullification of certain Federal agency actions (Section 6) eradicates Executive Order 13990 and Secretarial Order 3401, relating to environmental protection, without providing clear alternative strategies, potentially leading to adverse effects on environmental policies.
The Requirement for future leases (Section 5(b)) prohibits the cancellation of leases once bids are opened unless violations occur, which may limit the ability to adapt to changing circumstances and policy needs.
The Definitions section (Section 3) relies heavily on references to other documents, making it difficult for the general public to understand the implications without consulting multiple sources, affecting transparency and comprehension.
Designation of Special Areas of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (Section 7) restricts the Secretary's ability to designate or modify Special Areas without Congressional authorization, potentially slowing down prompt responsiveness to environmental or economic changes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill establishes that the official name of the legislation is the “Alaska’s Right to Produce Act of 2023.”
2. Congressional findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress states that it authorized the Secretary of the Interior to manage oil and gas programs in the Coastal Plain but believes the Department of the Interior was wrong to cancel certain leases without Congress's approval. It also notes that current rules for managing oil production in Alaska do not match what Congress intended in past laws.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for terms used in the Act, including "Coastal Plain" as defined in a specific law, the "Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program," certain lease tracts within the Coastal Plain, the "Record of Decision" for the leasing program, and who the "Secretary" refers to, which is the Secretary of the Interior.
4. Congressional approval of orders Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress requires its approval for any presidential actions to halt oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain and confirms existing authorizations necessary for oil and gas exploration, deeming them compliant with several environmental and administrative laws. Congress also mandates that relevant federal agencies continue processing these authorizations as needed.
5. Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a program for oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain, including the reissuance of previously canceled leases, completing a second lease sale by 2024, and limiting the ability to cancel leases unless there's a violation. It also states that certain environmental requirements are considered met, prohibits enforcing a recent draft environmental impact statement, and restricts judicial review except for specific claims to be handled by a particular court, with options for leaseholders to petition for agency action.
6. Nullification of certain Federal agency actions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section nullifies specific Federal agency actions, stating that the Bureau of Land Management's rule about managing the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, certain provisions in Executive Order 13990 related to climate crisis policies, and Secretarial Order 3401 about oil and gas activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, will no longer have any effect. Additionally, it prohibits the use of Federal funds to carry out the aforementioned provisions and orders.
7. Designation of Special Areas of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Secretary cannot create or expand Special Areas in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska without a new act of Congress specifically allowing it.