Overview
Title
An Act To ratify and approve all authorizations, permits, verifications, extensions, biological opinions, incidental take statements, and any other approvals or orders issued pursuant to Federal law necessary for the establishment and administration of the Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 6285 is a bill that says people can keep looking for and getting oil and gas in a special area in Alaska, even if some rules or leaders say they shouldn't. It also wants to take away some of the rules meant to protect nature if they stop people from getting the oil and gas.
Summary AI
H.R. 6285, the "Alaska’s Right to Produce Act of 2023," aims to ensure that oil and gas leasing continues in the Coastal Plain of Alaska, regardless of any presidential or administrative actions that might halt or pause it. It approves and reinstates necessary permits and authorizations for the program and mandates the reissuance of previously canceled leases. The bill also limits the ability to cancel existing or future leases unless there is a breach of contract by the leaseholder. Additionally, it removes certain federal rules and orders related to environmental protection that hinder the leasing program.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill titled "Alaska’s Right to Produce Act of 2023" aims to regulate oil and gas leasing activities in Alaska's Coastal Plain. This legislative proposal seeks to ratify and approve all necessary federal authorizations and permits related to oil and gas leasing in that region. The bill emphasizes Congressional authority over leasing decisions, challenging previous actions by the Department of the Interior which canceled certain leases. Additionally, it outlines the continuation of existing leases, mandates the reissuance of canceled leases, and sets terms for upcoming lease sales.
Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from this bill:
Judicial Review Constraints: The bill limits the ability of courts to review actions taken under the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program, raising concerns about accountability and transparency.
Environmental Oversight: The legislation broadly declares that necessary authorizations meet environmental act requirements, potentially bypassing detailed environmental reviews designed to safeguard public and environmental interests.
Nullification of Federal Orders: It annuls specific federal agency actions, including an executive order related to environmental policies and climate crisis measures, without providing alternative strategies.
Definitions and Deadlines: Certain sections of the bill are vague or lack specific criteria and deadlines, which could lead to inconsistent implementation and interpretation.
Special Area Restrictions: The bill prohibits the designation of new Special Areas in Alaska's National Petroleum Reserve without Congressional approval, potentially hindering adaptive environmental management.
Public Impact
The proposed legislation could have widespread implications for the public:
Environmental Concerns: By potentially bypassing comprehensive environmental reviews, the bill may impact ecological preservation efforts, sparking public concern among environmental advocates and local communities reliant on natural resources.
Energy Production and Economic Growth: Proponents argue that the bill could boost energy production, create jobs, and promote economic growth in Alaska. This could lead to lower energy costs and increased energy independence.
Legal and Administrative Uncertainty: By limiting judicial review, the bill might reduce the oversight of governmental actions, leading to possible legal and administrative challenges.
Stakeholder Impact
Different stakeholders may experience varying impacts from this legislation:
Oil and Gas Industry: The bill is likely beneficial to the oil and gas industry by ensuring continued and expanded access to Alaska's Coastal Plain resources. It provides clear pathways for lease issuance and mandates against arbitrary lease cancellations.
Environmental Groups: These groups may view the bill negatively due to its potential to undermine environmental protections and its nullification of orders related to climate change policies, which could hinder sustainability efforts.
Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples: Local and Indigenous communities might face mixed impacts. While economic opportunities and job creation could be welcomed, there may be concerns about environmental degradation and the long-term sustainability of traditional land uses.
Federal and State Agencies: These entities could encounter operational challenges due to restrictions on environmental oversight and the need to adapt to new legislative requirements, potentially resulting in resource allocation issues or policy shifts.
Overall, the bill illustrates a complex interplay between energy development interests and environmental and regulatory concerns, highlighting the ongoing debate regarding responsible natural resource management.
Issues
The prohibition on judicial review in Section 5(e)(1) may limit legal recourse and oversight regarding the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program, raising concerns about accountability and transparency. This potentially circumvents the legal system and could undermine checks and balances.
Section 4(c) broadly states that specified authorizations meet the requirements of various environmental acts, potentially circumventing comprehensive review processes designed to protect environmental and public interests. This may be perceived as neglecting necessary environmental protections.
The nullification of Executive Order 13990 as stated in Section 6(b) could have broad and potentially detrimental impacts on environmental policies, especially those relating to protecting public health, restoring science, and addressing the climate crisis, without a clear replacement strategy.
The language in Section 4(b)(1) is broad and does not specify which documents or orders are being confirmed, potentially leading to ambiguity and lack of clarity about the scope of the approvals.
The directive for federal departments and agencies in Section 4(b)(2) lacks specific deadlines or criteria, which may lead to inconsistent implementation of the law and insufficient oversight.
The nullification of Secretarial Order 3401 in Section 6(c) could lead to regulatory confusion regarding activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, especially since it involves complex legal and environmental considerations.
Section 5(a)(1) lacks clarity on the criteria for determining what constitutes a 'valid bid,' which could lead to differing interpretations and possible unfair bidding processes.
The requirement for an Act of Congress to authorize any changes to Special Areas in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, as outlined in Section 7, may restrict prompt adaptability to changing environmental or economic conditions.
Section 2 contains several issues with terminology and powers, such as the vague term 'national and public interest' in point (2) and suggesting significant power not explicitly granted by Congress in point (3), which may have political and legal implications.
The decision to withdraw the Notice of Availability and prohibit finalizing the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement in Section 5(d) might circumvent environmental review processes that could be necessary for informed decision-making.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill establishes that the official name of the legislation is the “Alaska’s Right to Produce Act of 2023.”
2. Congressional findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress states that it authorized the Secretary of the Interior to manage oil and gas programs in the Coastal Plain but believes the Department of the Interior was wrong to cancel certain leases without Congress's approval. It also notes that current rules for managing oil production in Alaska do not match what Congress intended in past laws.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for terms used in the Act, including "Coastal Plain" as defined in a specific law, the "Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program," certain lease tracts within the Coastal Plain, the "Record of Decision" for the leasing program, and who the "Secretary" refers to, which is the Secretary of the Interior.
4. Congressional approval of orders Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress requires its approval for any presidential actions to halt oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain and confirms existing authorizations necessary for oil and gas exploration, deeming them compliant with several environmental and administrative laws. Congress also mandates that relevant federal agencies continue processing these authorizations as needed.
5. Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a program for oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain, including the reissuance of previously canceled leases, completing a second lease sale by 2024, and limiting the ability to cancel leases unless there's a violation. It also states that certain environmental requirements are considered met, prohibits enforcing a recent draft environmental impact statement, and restricts judicial review except for specific claims to be handled by a particular court, with options for leaseholders to petition for agency action.
6. Nullification of certain Federal agency actions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section nullifies specific Federal agency actions, stating that the Bureau of Land Management's rule about managing the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, certain provisions in Executive Order 13990 related to climate crisis policies, and Secretarial Order 3401 about oil and gas activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, will no longer have any effect. Additionally, it prohibits the use of Federal funds to carry out the aforementioned provisions and orders.
7. Designation of Special Areas of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Secretary cannot create or expand Special Areas in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska without a new act of Congress specifically allowing it.