Overview
Title
To direct the Administrator of General Services and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to identify the utilization rate of certain public buildings and federally-leased space, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The USE IT Act wants to make sure government buildings are used better by checking how full they are. If a building is mostly empty, they plan to fix this by either making more efficient use of the space or selling some of it.
Summary AI
H.R. 6276, also known as the “Utilizing Space Efficiently and Improving Technologies Act of 2023” (USE IT Act), aims to improve the use of public buildings and federally-leased spaces by directing the General Services Administrator and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to assess and report on how these spaces are used. The bill requires the implementation of technology for measuring occupancy and mandates federal agencies to report on the utilization of their buildings. If building utilization falls below 60% over a year, steps must be taken to reduce space, such as consolidating agencies or selling unused space. The bill also addresses improving efficiency by consolidating the headquarters of federal agencies in the National Capital Region.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation titled the “Utilizing Space Efficiently and Improving Technologies Act of 2023” or the “USE IT Act of 2023” is designed to optimize the use of public buildings and federally-leased spaces. Through various measures, it seeks to ensure that these facilities are utilized effectively, minimizing waste and unnecessary expenditures associated with underutilized real estate. The bill necessitates the cooperation of federal agencies and the implementation of certain technologies to monitor usage, with an eye towards achieving specific utilization goals.
General Summary of the Bill
The main aim of the USE IT Act is to direct the Administrator of General Services and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to identify and enhance the utilization rate of certain public properties. This involves instituting methodologies for measuring building occupancy and optimizing space. The bill sets a target for buildings to be at least 60% utilized and outlines actions to be taken if this threshold is not met. It also calls for the consolidation of headquarters buildings to improve utilization rates. Various reports are required to ensure transparency and ongoing assessment of space utilization.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues are raised concerning the execution and clarity of the bill’s provisions. One significant concern is the vagueness in budget allocation and the absence of specific guidelines on the technologies or methodologies to be used. The tight deadlines set forth—60 days for methodology establishment and 180 days for deployment—could lead to rushed implementations, possibly compromising efficacy.
Furthermore, the bill’s mandate for a minimum 60% utilization rate lacks clear metrics for measuring utilization, potentially leading to inconsistencies. Similarly, exceptions to this target are allowed for “non-standard office space,” but the lack of a clear definition of such spaces could result in inconsistent applications.
In the matter of oversight, the reporting mechanism, which includes annual submissions on occupancy and utilization rates by various federal agencies, could become a heavy administrative burden, potentially incurring significant costs.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the effective implementation of this bill could lead to more efficient use of publicly owned or leased spaces, which might result in cost savings for taxpayers by reducing unnecessary expenditures on unutilized or underutilized real estate. Enhancing space efficiency might also yield environmental benefits by cutting down on the energy costs associated with maintaining larger spaces.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For federal agencies, the bill implies a heightened focus on accountability and transparency in space utilization. Agencies will need to invest time and resources to adhere to new reporting and optimization demands, which could temporarily strain operational capacities.
Real estate stakeholders, such as those involved in government leases, may see shifts in demand for space based on agencies’ drive to meet utilization objectives. This could lead to renegotiations or even terminations of existing leases where space is found to be underutilized.
Overall, while the bill holds promise for driving efficiencies in federal property management, its successful implementation hinges significantly on addressing the outlined issues, particularly in terms of clarity, timelines, and execution strategies.
Issues
Section 3: The section does not specify a budget, leaving room for potential wasteful spending if there is no cap or specified allocation. This is a significant issue as it directly impacts financial management and oversight.
Section 3: The deadline of 60 days to establish methodologies and deployment (180 days) might be too short for effective implementation, leading to rushed and inefficient decisions, which could affect the use of public funds and efficiency of federal operations.
Section 5: The text mandates a minimum building utilization of 60 percent but does not define 'utilization,' making it unclear how this is measured or calculated. This ambiguity can lead to inconsistent applications and mismanagement of real estate resources, impacting financial and operational effectiveness.
Section 4: The definition of 'actual utilization rates' and 'occupancy' is not sufficiently detailed, which could lead to inconsistent reporting across agencies. This lack of clarity may result in unreliable data that could misinform decision-making, affecting public reporting and accountability.
Section 6: The directive to achieve building utilizations of 60 percent or greater might lead to inefficient use of resources if not properly managed, as optimal utilization might vary based on specific use cases and needs. This can lead to ineffective use of public funds and resources.
Section 5: The section allows exceptions for building utilization metrics without defining what constitutes 'non-standard office space' as critical to the agency's mission, which could lead to inconsistent application of exceptions, affecting transparency and accountability.
Section 5: There is no specific timeline or process outlined for the Administrator to reduce the space of a tenant agency, leading to potential inefficiencies. This lack of process can result in prolonged inefficiency in space management, affecting financial outcomes.
Section 4: The utilization benchmark of 150 usable square feet per person seems arbitrary and may not be appropriate for all types of agency operations or activities, potentially leading to misleading reports on space utilization.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that it can be officially called the “Utilizing Space Efficiently and Improving Technologies Act of 2023” or the “USE IT Act of 2023”.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, several key terms are defined related to the management and usage of public buildings and federally-leased spaces. These definitions include concepts like "actual utilization rate", which refers to how much of a building is actually used, "Administrator", meaning the head of General Services, and "occupancy", describing how many employees work in a space regularly.
3. Identification and deployment of building usage technology Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that within 60 days of the law being passed, the Administrator, alongside the Director, must create standard methods and find technologies for tracking how public buildings and spaces leased by the government are used. Additionally, within 180 days, federal agencies must collaborate with the Administrator to set up and use sensors and other tools to track how these spaces are being used.
4. Reporting on usage of real property Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Federal agencies are required to submit annual reports on how they are using space in public and leased buildings, detailing occupancy, utilization rates, and any extra costs from unused space. They must also explain how they measure occupancy and compare the space used against a standard of 150 square feet per person.
5. Reducing unneeded space Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Director, with the Administrator's help, to ensure that federal buildings and leased spaces are used at least 60% each year. If a space isn't meeting this utilization, the Administrator must notify related agencies and committees and may reduce or consolidate the space if the issue continues. Exceptions can be made for agencies needing non-standard office spaces, and these exceptions must be reported to specific committees.
6. Headquarters buildings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Director, with the Administrator's help, to create and submit a plan within one year to combine government headquarters buildings in the National Capital Region so that they are at least 60% utilized. The plan should provide information on which departments will move, how unused buildings will be handled, the costs of the changes, and the expected savings. The implementation of this plan must start within a year after it’s submitted.