Overview
Title
An Act To authorize the Administrator of General Services and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to identify the utilization rate of certain public buildings and federally- leased space, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The USE IT Act of 2023 is a new rule that wants government offices to make sure they're using their buildings and rented spaces well, like playing a fair game of musical chairs to see if they really need all the chairs they have or if they can use less space. They have to check how full their buildings are using special tools and report what they find, unless it's top secret.
Summary AI
H.R. 6276, also known as the “Utilizing Space Efficiently and Improving Technologies Act of 2023” or the “USE IT Act of 2023”, aims to optimize the use of public buildings and federally-leased spaces by requiring federal agencies to report on and measure their occupancy and utilization rates. The bill mandates that federal agencies deploy technologies such as sensors to track how much space they actually use and to make publicly available reports about their space use unless it risks national security. It requires any underutilized space to be addressed with strategies like consolidating agencies or disposing of excess space, aiming for at least 60% building utilization. Exceptions can be given for agencies that prove needing non-standard spaces for critical missions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislative measure, referred to as the "Utilizing Space Efficiently and Improving Technologies Act of 2023" or the "USE IT Act of 2023," lays out a comprehensive framework for improving the utilization of federal public buildings and federally leased spaces. This commentary seeks to provide an overview of the bill's intentions, discuss critical issues that have been identified, explore its potential impact on the public, and consider the implications for specific stakeholders involved.
General Summary of the Bill
The legislative proposal aims to improve how government office spaces are used by establishing a methodology for measuring occupancy and utilization rates, deploying technological solutions, and setting minimum utilization benchmarks. In outlining procedures for reporting these metrics, it also requires periodic assessments and mandates changes when utilization falls short of established targets. The bill includes provisions for consolidating headquarters in the National Capital Region to improve space usage, and it introduces reporting obligations for federal agencies with space usage below desired thresholds. Furthermore, it specifies consequences for spaces not meeting minimum occupancy standards and tasks the Government Accountability Office (GAO) with evaluating associated measurement costs.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several salient issues have emerged concerning the bill. First, the timelines for deploying technologies to measure occupancy may be unusually short, potentially rushing the implementation process and affecting efficiency. Moreover, the bill's usage benchmarks stipulate a 60 percent utilization rate but fail to clarify what constitutes "utilization," which could create inconsistencies in application. The allowances for disregarding the publication of reports on grounds of national security might undermine transparency. Additionally, the bill does not elaborate on how personally identifiable information will be protected when employing occupancy-measuring technologies, raising privacy concerns.
The procedure by which organizations may be relocated or consolidated is not clearly defined, potentially leading to biased or inefficient outcomes based on institutional preferences. Cost considerations related to changes in space requirements are notably absent, potentially imposing unforeseen financial burdens on federal agencies. Enforcement of the "Use it or Lose it" policy lacks punitive measures for non-compliance, potentially diminishing its effectiveness. Lastly, without clearly outlining follow-up actions post-investigation into underutilized spaces, the bill may struggle to address inefficiencies effectively.
Public Impact
Broadly, the USE IT Act of 2023 could bring about more efficient utilization of public resources and pause taxpayer dollars by reducing governmental space wastage. Improvements in space utilization could diminish unnecessary expenditures associated with maintaining and leasing underutilized properties. By mandating comprehensive reports and investigations, the bill also aims to minimize inefficiencies and ensure government accountability.
From a privacy standpoint, there is genuine concern over the deployment of technologies to measure office space utilization. The legislation's failure to provide detailed measures for protecting personal information may elicit anxiety among federal employees and the general public, potentially broadening the discussion about organizational privacy safeguards.
Stakeholder Impact
For federal agencies, the bill could prompt administrative rearrangements by imposing stricter space utilization criteria. Adjustments to comply with the utilization targets might require strategic planning and budget reallocations for potentially disruptive property consolidations. Positive impacts could stem from increased operational efficiencies and cost savings over time, though these benefits may manifest more slowly.
Conversely, the potential need to return improperly utilized spaces could present logistical challenges and necessitate reevaluation of workspace strategies. Agencies reliant on non-standard office spaces may derive some relief from proposed exceptions, yet still face scrutiny to justify these allowances.
In regard to the public, through indirect channels of lower government spending and enhanced organizational efficiency, taxpayers may benefit if the legislation successfully addresses the inefficiencies it aims to tackle.
Issues
The timeline for deploying occupancy-measuring technologies, as specified in Section 3, is very short, which might lead to rushed decisions or inadequate implementation affecting operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Section 5 mandates a building utilization requirement of 60 percent but does not clearly define 'utilization,' leading to potential ambiguities which could affect compliance and implementation.
The exception in Section 4 for not publishing reports due to national security concerns might be used loosely, posing transparency issues and concerns over accountability.
Section 3 lacks clarity on how the protection of personally identifiable information will be enforced when using occupancy-measuring technologies, raising privacy concerns.
Section 2 defines terms like 'actual utilization rate' and 'capacity' that could be confusing due to their overlap, potentially leading to misinterpretation in implementation.
In Section 6, the requirement for headquarters consolidations lacks criteria for selecting which departments and agencies will collocate, which could lead to biases and inefficiencies.
Section 5 doesn't address potential costs related to adjusting space requirements, which could lead to unexpected financial burdens for tenant agencies.
The absence of penalties or enforcement mechanisms in Section 7 if Federal tenants do not report or meet space utilization requirements may lead to ineffectiveness of the 'Use it or Lose it' policy.
Section 8 does not specify a budget for the GAO report, potentially leading to excessive costs that could impact resource allocation.
Section 9's lack of a follow-up process or corrective measures after investigations into underutilized space may limit the utility of these investigations, leading to persisting inefficiencies.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that it can be officially called the “Utilizing Space Efficiently and Improving Technologies Act of 2023” or the “USE IT Act of 2023”.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section explains definitions related to building space usage for federal purposes, including terms like "actual utilization rate," which refers to the space used compared to the space available, "Administrator" for the General Services head, and "occupancy," describing how many people work in a space full-time.
3. Identification and deployment of building usage technology Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a plan for the government to establish methods and use technology to measure how full public and federally-leased buildings are, while ensuring that personal information remains private. This involves using sensors and data from ID badges to measure occupancy within 180 days after the law is passed.
4. Reporting on usage of real property Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Federal agency leaders must submit annual reports detailing space usage in public buildings and leased spaces, including occupancy rates, methods for determining these rates, comparison to usage benchmarks, and costs of unused space. These reports should generally be posted online unless doing so would harm national security.
5. Reducing unneeded space Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Director, with the Administrator's help, to ensure that federal buildings and leased spaces are used at least 60% each year. If a space isn't meeting this utilization, the Administrator must notify related agencies and committees and may reduce or consolidate the space if the issue continues. Exceptions can be made for agencies needing non-standard office spaces, and these exceptions must be reported to specific committees.
6. Headquarters buildings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Director, with the Administrator's help, to create and submit a plan within one year to combine government headquarters buildings in the National Capital Region so that they are at least 60% utilized. The plan should provide information on which departments will move, how unused buildings will be handled, the costs of the changes, and the expected savings. The implementation of this plan must start within a year after it’s submitted.
7. Federal Use it or Lose it Leases Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Federal Use it or Lose it Leases Act requires federal tenants to report annual office space utilization to the General Services Administrator and have plans for returning space if usage falls below 60% for six months. Agencies with independent leasing powers must also report to Congress but exceptions apply for intelligence community properties.
8. GAO report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires that within one year from its enactment, the Comptroller General must provide Congress with a report detailing how much it costs each Federal agency to measure the use of space in public buildings and federal leases. This includes the cost of new technologies for this purpose, but excludes any devices that were installed before the law was passed.
9. Investigation of underutilized space Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires heads of Federal agencies to report any public buildings or leased spaces with low usage to their inspector generals. The inspector general must then investigate these spaces to check for any signs of fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement.