Overview
Title
An Act To direct the Comptroller General to conduct a review on the impact of crime on public building usage, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill asks some important people to study how crime affects places like federal offices and how safe it is to travel to them, so they can figure out if changes are needed to keep people safe.
Summary AI
H.R. 6261, titled the "Impact of Crime on Public Building Usage Act of 2023," aims to understand how crime affects the usage of public buildings in the United States. The bill instructs the Comptroller General to examine how crime, safety concerns, and homelessness impact the use of federal buildings for work, the safety of commuting to these buildings, and the costs related to these issues. Additionally, it requires the Inspector General of the General Services Administration to report on the costs associated with crime around federal buildings, highlighting the impact on building operations and safety.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Impact of Crime on Public Building Usage Act of 2023," aims to analyze the effects of crime on the usage of public buildings, particularly federal facilities. The bill mandates the Comptroller General to conduct a comprehensive review and submit a report to Congress within one year. This review will focus on how increased crime rates, drug use, and homelessness in urban environments influence in-person work at federal buildings, the safety and commuting to these buildings, and the associated costs of maintaining safety. Additionally, the General Services Administration's inspector general is tasked with providing a separate report on the costs and impacts of crime on federal buildings.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues emerge with the bill's current draft. Firstly, the bill lacks clear definitions for terms like "crime," "public safety," and "safety issues," which could lead to varied interpretation and inconsistent findings in the reports. Moreover, the bill does not specify the methodology for conducting these reviews, leaving room for subjective and potentially unreliable data collection. Another significant gap is the absence of any follow-up actions or accountability measures once the reports are submitted, potentially undermining any effective response to the findings. Additionally, there is no mention of the financial and resource implications for compiling these reports, raising questions about the feasibility of thorough investigations without specified funding.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill is intended to improve understanding of how crime affects public building usage, potentially leading to more informed policy decisions aimed at enhancing public safety and federal workforce efficiency. However, the lack of clear definitions and methodologies might impair the usefulness of the findings, delaying or preventing effective responses to significant public safety concerns around federal buildings. For the general public, especially those who work in or near federal buildings, clearer insights into these issues could lead to environments that are safer and more conducive to productivity if followed by substantial actions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For federal employees and agencies, the bill could catalyze important discussions about workplace safety and commuting issues. Understanding the impacts could pressure agencies to adjust work environments or commuting policies for improved safety. However, if the bill's findings are ambiguous due to lack of clarity in definitions and methodologies, stakeholders may remain without clear guidance or support.
City governments and law enforcement agencies, especially in urban areas, might find the insights beneficial, potentially using them to address crime more directly and implement strategic safety enhancements. Conversely, if the bill does not lead to actionable plans or funding, these stakeholders could be left with increased expectations but limited resources to act.
In summary, while the bill seeks to address critical issues posed by rising crime rates around public buildings, its effectiveness hinges on resolving significant ambiguities and ensuring actionable outcomes from its findings.
Issues
The bill lacks specific definitions for key terms such as 'crime', 'public safety', and the scope of 'safety issues', which could result in inconsistent interpretation and application of the findings in Sections 2 and 3.
There is no clear outline of the methodology to be used in conducting the reviews and reports in Sections 2 and 3, potentially leading to inconsistent data collection and reporting standards that may affect the reliability of the findings.
The bill does not mention any follow-up actions or measures to address the findings presented in the reports outlined in Sections 2 and 3, which could lead to a lack of accountability or tangible solutions to identified problems.
Section 3 does not address the budget or resources required for conducting the report on the costs of crime around public buildings, leaving it unclear if additional funding is necessary or how it would be sourced.
The bill mentions 'agency exceptions' in Section 2 without specifying which types of exceptions should be considered or reviewed, leading to potential oversight of critical data.
The lack of clarity on how costs and impacts will be measured and evaluated in Section 3 may result in subjectivity in the report's findings, affecting its utility and accuracy.
There is a potential ambiguity in Section 2 regarding 'effects of low office utilization rates on safety around Federal buildings,' as it does not provide a clear definition or scope of this issue, which might result in varied interpretations.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act gives it a name, which is the "Impact of Crime on Public Building Usage Act of 2023".
2. Report on impact of crime on public building usage Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that, within a year, the U.S. Comptroller General must review and report to Congress on how increased crime, drug use, and homelessness in urban areas affect public building usage for in-person work, commute patterns, and safety around Federal buildings. It will also cover any exceptions to safety policies and the costs related to these safety issues.
3. Report on costs of crime around public buildings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the inspector general of the General Services Administration to provide a report to Congress within one year on the costs and impacts of crime and safety issues affecting Federal buildings.