Overview

Title

An Act To require the Secretary of the Treasury to report on financial institutions’ involvement with officials of the Iranian Government, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6245 wants the Treasury Secretary to check if banks are secretly helping important people in Iran do bad things with money and make sure they stop unless they work with the U.S., with some exceptions for helping people and safety.

Summary AI

H.R. 6245, titled the "Holding Iranian Leaders Accountable Act of 2023," requires the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury to periodically report on the financial ties between U.S. or foreign financial institutions and key Iranian officials, including involvement in corrupt or illicit activities. The bill mandates actions against financial institutions that maintain accounts or provide significant financial services to these Iranian officials, unless they agree to cooperate with the U.S. government. It also outlines conditions under which such requirements can be waived or suspended in the national interest and provides exceptions for humanitarian and national security activities. The act will expire five years after its enactment unless Iran is no longer deemed a primary money laundering concern or shows significant cooperation with U.S. strategic objectives.

Published

2024-04-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-04-17
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6245rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
7
Words:
2,408
Pages:
13
Sentences:
59

Language

Nouns: 693
Verbs: 144
Adjectives: 167
Adverbs: 25
Numbers: 105
Entities: 173

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.32
Average Sentence Length:
40.81
Token Entropy:
5.21
Readability (ARI):
22.78

AnalysisAI

The bill titled "Holding Iranian Leaders Accountable Act of 2023" is a legislative proposal that seeks to enhance transparency and accountability regarding financial interactions with Iranian officials. As part of its objectives, the bill mandates that the President report to Congress on these officials' assets and financial activities. Additionally, it outlines measures to restrict certain financial institutions from maintaining accounts or providing services to these individuals. The Act also provides for specific exemptions and conditions under which its provisions may be waived or suspended.

General Summary of the Bill

The Act aims to address concerns about financial dealings with Iranian officials, who are linked to issues like money laundering, corruption, and the sponsorship of terrorism. It requires a comprehensive report every two years on the financial assets and activities of select Iranian leaders, strives to curb financial institutions' involvement with these officials, and sets conditions for possible exemptions. The bill intends to use transparency as a tool to deter corrupt practices and illegal financial activities and to reinforce national security objectives.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the key issues raised by the bill is the potential limitation in its reporting requirements. By allowing reports to cover as few as five individuals, significant figures might be omitted, thus undermining transparency. Moreover, the provision for waivers and exemptions without clear and definitive criteria could lead to misuse, enabling arbitrary decisions that might not always serve the intended purpose of accountability. Additionally, the public's access to these reports might be hampered by the allowance of classified annexes, which could restrict important information. Lastly, the ambiguity in some of the legislative language, such as the absence of definitions for terms like "significant financial services," presents challenges for consistent application and enforcement.

Impact on the Public

The impact of this bill on the public revolves primarily around issues of national security and economic integrity. By ensuring that financial institutions and their transactions are scrutinized, the bill seeks to protect the public from indirect involvement in illicit activities connected to terrorism and corruption. However, there might be concerns about transparency if important details are omitted or classified. The public could benefit from the potential reduction in national security threats associated with money laundering and terrorist financing.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Financial Institutions: Both U.S. and foreign financial institutions could face significant operational impacts from this bill. They might have to navigate increased compliance measures and potential restrictions, particularly if they handle accounts linked to the identified Iranian officials. The lack of precise definitions could complicate compliance, potentially leading to uneven enforcement.

Iranian Officials Identified in the Bill: For those directly targeted by the bill, the implications could be substantial. If successfully implemented, their ability to leverage international financial systems might be significantly reduced.

The U.S. Government and Law Enforcement: On the enforcement side, the government could face challenges in consistently applying the Act's provisions due to the identified ambiguities and potential for broad interpretations of waivers and exceptions.

In summary, the "Holding Iranian Leaders Accountable Act of 2023" aims to bolster transparency and accountability in international financial dealings with key Iranian figures. While it seeks to fortify economic and national security, potential legislative ambiguities and loopholes could pose challenges in its implementation and effective oversight.

Issues

  • The provision in Section 3 that allows the President to limit the report to not fewer than 5 natural persons could omit significant individuals without sufficient justification, limiting transparency and accountability regarding financial dealings with Iranian officials.

  • The waiver provision in Section 3 potentially allows for broad and arbitrary use by allowing the President to waive reporting requirements for up to a year in the 'national interest' without clear criteria, which could lead to misuse and reduce oversight.

  • The lack of clear criteria for what constitutes 'significant cooperation' in Section 3 creates a loophole that might result in subjective or uneven application, especially when exempting individuals or institutions from reporting requirements.

  • The requirement in Section 3 for a report on financial institutions and assets connected to certain Iranian officials must be unclassified but may include a classified annex; this could limit public scrutiny of key details and reduce transparency.

  • Section 4 mandates actions against financial institutions without outlining the process for determining whether an institution is subject to such measures, raising concerns about arbitrary enforcement and potential misuse of power.

  • The lack of specific definitions for terms like 'significant financial services' in Sections 4 and 3 could lead to inconsistent application and enforcement of financial restrictions, potentially impacting both U.S. and foreign institutions unevenly.

  • Section 5's reference to exceptions for activities under the National Security Act of 1947 might exempt a broad range of actions from oversight, potentially allowing for wasteful spending or misuse of funds without adequate transparency.

  • The sunset provisions in Section 6 could lead to ambiguity if the conditions provided are very close to each other, leading to confusion about the Act's end date, potentially affecting compliance and enforcement strategies.

  • In Section 2, the use of vague terms such as 'substantial involvement' and 'covert methods' without specific examples or definitions makes it difficult to assess the extent of the described actions, reducing the clarity and impact of the findings.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act specifies its short title, which is the "Holding Iranian Leaders Accountable Act of 2023".

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Congress outlines that Iran has significant corruption issues and its military is involved in the economy, particularly the IRGC. There are concerns about Iran's financial sector, as highlighted by the Department of Treasury and the Financial Action Task Force, due to money laundering and other illicit activities. Furthermore, Iran continues to be a major sponsor of terrorism, supporting groups in countries like Bahrain, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen, according to the State Department.

3. Report on financial institutions and assets connected to certain Iranian officials Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the President to report every two years to Congress on the financial assets and activities of certain Iranian officials, describing how they acquired and used these assets. It allows exemptions and waivers under specific conditions, and requires that unclassified parts of the report be made public if it serves the national interest, available in multiple languages on the Department of the Treasury's website.

4. Restrictions on certain financial institutions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines actions the Secretary must take within 90 days after submitting a report, including requiring U.S. financial institutions to close certain accounts and stop significant financial services to individuals in the report, and seeking similar actions from foreign institutions. The Secretary can suspend these requirements if it's in the national interest, explaining the reasons to Congress.

5. Exceptions for national security; implementation authority Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines exceptions to certain requirements for activities related to national security, including authorized U.S. intelligence activities, compliance with international agreements related to the United Nations, and transactions involving the sale of essential goods or humanitarian aid to Iran.

6. Sunset Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Act will stop being effective either 5 years after it is enacted or 30 days after the Secretary informs Congress that Iran is no longer a primary money laundering concern or is significantly helping the United States with important international issues, like stopping terrorism.

7. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

For this Act, several key terms are defined: "appropriate Members of Congress" include various leaders in the House and Senate; a "financial institution" can be a U.S. or foreign bank; "funds" refer to cash, equities, and other assets like stocks and bonds; "knowingly" means being aware of an action or should have been aware; the "Secretary" is the Secretary of the Treasury; and the "United States financial institution" follows a specific legal definition.