Overview
Title
To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to authorize partnerships between States and nongovernmental entities for the purpose of reclaiming and restoring land and water resources adversely affected by coal mining activities before August 3, 1977, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill lets states team up with organizations to clean up land and water damaged by old coal mining, using a plan that ensures everyone works together properly. It lasts until 2030 and has rules about how these clean-up projects should be approved and managed.
Summary AI
H. R. 6233 aims to amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. The bill allows States to form partnerships with nongovernmental organizations to reclaim land and water affected by coal mining before August 3, 1977. It establishes guidelines for states to create memorandums of understanding with federal agencies for remediation of mine drainage and outlines the approval process and criteria for these projects. The act is scheduled to remain in effect until September 30, 2030.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
This bill, titled the Community Reclamation Partnerships Act, seeks to amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. The primary goal of this legislation is to facilitate partnerships between state governments and non-governmental entities to reclaim and restore land and water resources that were adversely affected by coal mining activities conducted before August 3, 1977. Such partnerships aim to address mine drainage issues that have long-term negative impacts on environmental quality.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill proposes a framework for states with approved reclamation programs to create memoranda of understanding with relevant federal or state agencies to remediate mine drainage on abandoned mine lands. This includes enhancing water quality through systematic monitoring and maintenance procedures. Additionally, the legislation allows for projects led by "Community Reclaimers," which are individuals or organizations willing to voluntarily assist in reclamation efforts. These projects must meet specific submission criteria, including public consultation before commencement.
Summary of Significant Issues
Ambiguity in Definitions and Roles: The bill presents challenges with vague language, such as the term "relevant Federal or State agencies," which could lead to confusion regarding the responsible authorities for remediation activities. Furthermore, the broad definition of "Community Reclaimer" raises concerns about allowing entities with potential conflicts of interest to participate without adequate oversight.
Financial and Legal Liabilities: The provision that states would assume liability for damages, except in cases of gross negligence by Community Reclaimers, may pose significant fiscal implications for state governments. This could potentially lead to unexpected financial burdens and legal challenges.
Lack of Transparency and Accountability: The section on reprocessing materials extracted during remediation lacks explicit controls to ensure transparency and accountability, creating possible financial and ethical risks.
Potential Delays and Jurisdictional Conflicts: The allowance for a 120-day period for the approval of proposed projects might delay urgent remediation efforts. Additionally, the bill's language could lead to jurisdictional conflicts between state and federal agencies.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to improve environmental quality by addressing mine drainage issues, which have long been a concern due to their detrimental effects on water resources. Successful implementation could lead to healthier ecosystems and improved water quality, benefiting communities near abandoned mine sites.
However, the ambiguous language and potential for delayed approval processes may hinder prompt action, potentially prolonging environmental hazards. Additionally, the lack of clear accountability measures might lead to ineffective use of resources or mismanagement of funds, which could challenge public trust and engender skepticism about the effectiveness of these remediation efforts.
Impact on Stakeholders
State Governments: While this act provides an opportunity for states to engage in impactful reclamation projects, the associated financial liabilities and potential for legal entanglements present significant challenges. States need to ensure that they have adequate legal authority and financial resources to manage these responsibilities successfully.
Community Reclaimers: Organizations or individuals participating as Community Reclaimers can play a pivotal role in environmental restoration. However, without stringent oversight, there is a risk that these entities could prioritize financial gains over environmental and community interests.
Local Communities: Residents near affected mines stand to benefit significantly from improved environmental conditions if these projects are conducted efficiently. Nevertheless, they face potential disadvantages if the projects are delayed or mismanaged, leaving lingering environmental and health hazards.
Overall, while the Community Reclamation Partnerships Act proposes a novel approach to tackling the lingering impacts of historic coal mining activities, its successful implementation will heavily depend on addressing the outlined issues to prevent negative impacts on stakeholders and ensure effective reclamation outcomes.
Issues
The definition of 'Community Reclaimer' in Section 3(n)(4) is broad and might allow entities with conflicting interests to participate without sufficient oversight or criteria to ensure they are suitable for the role, raising ethical and governance concerns.
There is ambiguity in Section 3(m) regarding the 'relevant Federal or State agencies' involved in the memoranda, which could lead to confusion and potential jurisdictional conflicts.
Section 3(n)(3)(B) mentions the reprocessing of materials and the use of proceeds to defray remediation costs and reimburse federal agencies, but lacks transparency and accountability controls, which could pose financial and ethical risks.
The lack of clarity in Section 4 regarding what constitutes 'control or treatment' in accordance with a State memorandum could lead to legal disputes over state liability in mine drainage projects.
Potential delays might arise from the 120-day approval period in Sections 3(m)(4) and 3(n)(1), which could hinder timely remediation efforts, impacting environmental and community interests.
Section 3(n)(1)(E) could create financial liabilities for states assuming responsibility for damages linked to Community Reclaimer projects, except for cases of gross negligence or intentional misconduct, which may have significant fiscal implications.
Section 5's amendments are brief and lack context about the projects proposed under subsection (n), creating ambiguity in the application and interpretation of the legislation's changes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states its short title, allowing it to be referred to as the “Community Reclamation Partnerships Act.”
2. Reference Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Whenever this law talks about changing something, it is referring to changes in the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.
3. State memoranda of understanding for certain remediation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows states with approved programs to create agreements with federal or state agencies to clean up water pollution from abandoned mines. These agreements must include strategies to improve water quality and procedures for monitoring and maintenance, and they must be open for public review before approval. Additionally, it describes rules for projects led by "Community Reclaimers" to restore abandoned mine lands, requiring state agreements, project descriptions, and public notices before the projects start.
4. Clarifying State liability for mine drainage projects Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to Section 413(d) clarifies that states will not be held liable for controlling or treating mine drainage projects if their actions are aligned with a state memorandum of understanding approved under a specified section of the existing law.
5. Conforming amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes changes to Section 405(f) of a legal code by removing certain punctuation in the existing text and adding a new requirement for a list of proposed projects.
6. Sunset provision Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section known as the "Sunset provision" states that this Act will remain valid until September 30, 2030.