Overview

Title

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize a program to assess the threat, vulnerability, and consequences of terrorism or other security threats, as appropriate, to certain events, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make sure big events, like concerts or sports games, are safe by letting people check if there are any threats, like bad guys trying to cause trouble. It also works on keeping our rights safe while doing this.

Summary AI

H. R. 6229 aims to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish a program for evaluating threats, vulnerabilities, and potential impacts of terrorism and other security concerns at specific special events in the U.S. The program will allow relevant authorities to request a security rating for upcoming events, potentially receiving federal support for security and situational awareness. It includes annual reporting on the number and nature of events assessed, as well as periodic assessments to enhance the program. Additionally, the bill mandates research into new technologies to improve security at large gatherings.

Published

2024-12-10
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-12-10
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6229rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,253
Pages:
8
Sentences:
27

Language

Nouns: 379
Verbs: 78
Adjectives: 92
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 53
Entities: 86

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.39
Average Sentence Length:
46.41
Token Entropy:
4.92
Readability (ARI):
25.93

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the "DHS Special Events Program and Support Act," seeks to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 by establishing a program within the Department of Homeland Security. This program is designed to assess the threat, vulnerability, and consequences of terrorism or other security threats at specific events. The initiative focuses on pre-planned events that are not classified as National Special Security Events. It aims to offer officials a standard process to request special event ratings, potentially receiving direct support for security and situational awareness. Additionally, the bill mandates annual reporting to Congress on the program's activities and outcomes.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill intends to create a structured method for federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial officials to evaluate the risk associated with certain special events. By appraising these events, the Department of Homeland Security can provide necessary support in terms of security and situational awareness. The legislation also specifies the need for annual reports to ensure transparency and accountability, summarizing the number of events evaluated and supported, the rating processes, and any reassessments requested by officials.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary issues with the legislation is the absence of specified funding or budget allocations for the special events program. Without clear financial backing, there is uncertainty about the resources available to effectively implement and sustain the program. Another concern is the lack of explicit criteria or processes for reassessing special event ratings, which may lead to subjective or inconsistent decisions and potentially unfair application of security measures.

Moreover, the bill does not outline mechanisms for oversight and transparency, raising concerns about governance and the appropriate allocation of public resources. The use of complex and formalized language could pose challenges for stakeholders, particularly those lacking legal expertise, in understanding their responsibilities and the program's operations. Although the bill highlights the protection of constitutional, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties, it does not provide specific guidelines or mechanisms to ensure these protections are enforced.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

If enacted, the bill could significantly impact the public by enhancing security measures at special events, potentially reducing the risk of terrorist attacks or security threats. By providing a structured approach for evaluating and supporting these events, communities can feel safer and more secure in their participation and organization of large gatherings.

Specific stakeholders, such as local and state officials, may benefit from the federal support this program promises, including security resources that might not be otherwise available. However, without an allocated budget, these benefits might be limited or inconsistent, affecting the reliability of support.

Conversely, the legislation's vague reassessment criteria and lack of transparency might lead to uncertainties or mistrust among stakeholders regarding how resources are assigned. Moreover, the public and stakeholders need assurance that their civil rights are fully respected, which requires more detailed mechanisms in the bill.

Overall, the DHS Special Events Program and Support Act proposes a potentially valuable framework for assessing and bolstering security at various public events. However, to maximize its effectiveness and public trust, the bill would benefit from clearer guidelines on funding, reassessment processes, and safeguards for personal freedoms.

Issues

  • The lack of specified funding or budget allocation for the special events program in Sections 2 and 890E could lead to challenges in its implementation and effectiveness, causing uncertainty about resource availability, which is crucial for stakeholders and taxpayers to understand financial implications.

  • Sections 2 and 890E do not detail the criteria or processes for reassessing special event ratings, potentially leading to subjective or inconsistent decisions, which might affect fairness and reliability in the application of security measures.

  • There is no mention of oversight, transparency, or accountability mechanisms in Sections 2 and 890E, which could raise concerns about the program's governance and the proper allocation of public resources.

  • The complex and formalized language used in the program's requirements (Sections 2 and 890E) might make it difficult for stakeholders, particularly those without legal expertise, to fully comprehend their responsibilities and the program's operations, impacting stakeholder engagement and compliance.

  • While the bill in Section 2 mentions protecting constitutional, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties in mass gathering research, it lacks specific mechanisms or guidelines to ensure these protections are consistently applied, which could raise ethical and legal concerns.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act declares its short title, allowing it to be referred to as the "DHS Special Events Program and Support Act."

2. DHS special events program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The new section added to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 establishes a program within the Department of Homeland Security to evaluate the risks of terrorism and other security threats at special events that are not classified as National Special Security Events. The program allows officials to request special event ratings, which can lead to assistance with security and situational awareness, and requires the Secretary to report annually on the events reviewed and supported by the program.

890E. Special events program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Special Events Program, authorized within the Department, allows for the assessment of threats and security needs at certain special events, excluding those already deemed National Special Security Events. This program provides a structured process for officials to request special event ratings, offers potential security support based on risk assessments, and necessitates annual reporting to Congress on the program's activities and effectiveness.