Overview

Title

An Act To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize a program to assess the threat, vulnerability, and consequences of terrorism or other security threats, as appropriate, to certain events, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to help keep people safe at big events like concerts or sports games by checking for dangers like bad guys or other threats and figuring out how to make things more secure. It also wants to make sure they're using the best gadgets and tricks to keep everyone protected while respecting people's privacy and rights.

Summary AI

H.R. 6229, also known as the “DHS Special Events Program and Support Act,” aims to modify the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to create a program that evaluates the risk of terrorism or other security threats at special events in the United States. This program allows officials to request security assessments and support for pre-planned events not classified as National Special Security Events. It includes mandatory annual reports on the program's activities and requires periodic assessments of its effectiveness. Additionally, the bill requires research and development into technologies to improve security and awareness at mass gatherings.

Published

2024-12-11
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-12-11
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6229rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
981
Pages:
6
Sentences:
18

Language

Nouns: 294
Verbs: 59
Adjectives: 81
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 33
Entities: 61

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.46
Average Sentence Length:
54.50
Token Entropy:
4.85
Readability (ARI):
30.29

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "DHS Special Events Program and Support Act," seeks to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 with the aim of establishing a program within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The focus of this program is to assess threats, vulnerabilities, and potential consequences related to terrorism or other security threats at specific events. These events are pre-planned and not classified as National Special Security Events. The program offers officials a means to request security ratings for events, which can then lead to DHS providing direct support in terms of security and situational awareness. Additionally, the bill mandates the submission of annual reports to Congress, detailing the program's assessments and the assistance provided.

Significant Issues

A comprehensive examination of the bill reveals several notable issues. One primary concern is the lack of a specified budget for the newly proposed program. This omission could lead to ambiguity regarding the program’s scale and operational reach, raising questions about its long-term sustainability. Additionally, while the bill outlines factors for assessing events, it does not prioritize or weight these factors, potentially leading to inconsistent decisions.

Another critical issue is transparency and accountability. The bill does not specify mechanisms to ensure that the assignments of special event ratings are conducted transparently, nor does it provide guidelines for the reassessment of such ratings. The language within the bill is somewhat formal and complex, which might create barriers for stakeholders, especially those without legal expertise, in fully grasping their roles and responsibilities.

The voluntary nature of the program's request process is also a concern, as it might lead to important events not being evaluated or supported appropriately. Furthermore, while the bill acknowledges the need to protect constitutional, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties in its mass gathering research, it does not provide specific methods to ensure these protections are consistently upheld.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill aims to enhance the security framework around special events, potentially improving public safety. By establishing a structured program for evaluating risk, it could enhance preparedness and response measures at events, leading to increased public confidence in attending such gatherings. However, the public might experience uncertainty regarding which events receive support and how resources are allocated without clear guidelines and transparent processes.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial officials, this program could provide much-needed support in safeguarding events, thereby easing the burden on local law enforcement and security agencies. However, the lack of explicit resource allocation might lead to logistical and financial challenges when planning events.

Stakeholders responsible for implementing the program may face difficulties due to the bill’s complexity and lack of clear criteria, which could lead to implementation delays or misinterpretation of responsibilities. Conversely, if well-implemented, the program might offer these stakeholders a valuable tool in assessing and mitigating security threats.

In conclusion, while the DHS Special Events Program and Support Act has the potential to enhance security measures at significant events, it requires careful attention to its funding, transparency, and clarity in implementation to realize its intended benefits fully.

Issues

  • The bill lacks a specified budget or funding source for the DHS special events program (Section 890E), which could lead to challenges in determining its scope and feasibility.

  • There is no outlined mechanism to ensure transparency or accountability in the assignment of special event ratings and the subsequent allocation of resources (Section 2).

  • The process and criteria for reassessment of a special event rating are not explicitly detailed, which could lead to subjective or inconsistent decisions (Section 2 and Section 890E).

  • The bill lists a number of factors for event assessment but does not specify how these factors are weighted or prioritized, leading to potential ambiguity in the decision-making process (Section 2).

  • The language used in some sections is highly formalized and complex, which might make it difficult for all stakeholders, particularly those without legal expertise, to fully understand their responsibilities and the program's operations (Section 2 and Section 890E).

  • While the bill mentions the protection of constitutional, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties protections related to mass gathering research, it lacks specific mechanisms or guidelines to ensure these protections are consistently applied (Section 890E).

  • The process for submitting requests for special event ratings appears voluntary, which might not ensure all relevant events are appropriately evaluated or supported (Section 2).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act declares its short title, allowing it to be referred to as the "DHS Special Events Program and Support Act."

2. DHS special events program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The new section added to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 establishes a program within the Department of Homeland Security to evaluate the risks of terrorism and other security threats at special events that are not classified as National Special Security Events. The program allows officials to request special event ratings, which can lead to assistance with security and situational awareness, and requires the Secretary to report annually on the events reviewed and supported by the program.

890E. Special events program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Special Events Program, authorized within the Department, allows for the assessment of threats and security needs at certain special events, excluding those already deemed National Special Security Events. This program provides a structured process for officials to request special event ratings, offers potential security support based on risk assessments, and necessitates annual reporting to Congress on the program's activities and effectiveness.