Overview

Title

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "Hands Off Our Home Appliances Act" is a rule that makes sure any new energy-saving rules for things like fridges or washing machines are not only possible with today's technology but also won't cost people too much money. It wants to protect people from having to pay more for their appliances without a good reason.

Summary AI

H.R. 6192, titled the "Hands Off Our Home Appliances Act," amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to ensure that any new or updated energy conservation standards proposed by the Secretary of Energy are both technologically feasible and economically justified before being implemented. The bill outlines specific criteria that must be considered, including the potential cost impacts on consumers, energy or water savings required, and the effect on product availability and market competition. Additionally, the Secretary is required to conduct economic analyses and review the feasibility and justification of these standards regularly to protect consumer interests and prevent unnecessary costs.

Published

2024-03-26
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-03-26
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6192rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
2,651
Pages:
16
Sentences:
34

Language

Nouns: 719
Verbs: 226
Adjectives: 122
Adverbs: 35
Numbers: 75
Entities: 79

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.36
Average Sentence Length:
77.97
Token Entropy:
5.03
Readability (ARI):
41.48

AnalysisAI

The proposed bill, officially titled the "Hands Off Our Home Appliances Act," seeks to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act by preventing the Secretary of Energy from setting new or revised energy conservation standards unless those standards are both technologically feasible and economically justified. The bill is sponsored by several members of Congress and has progressed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union for further consideration.

General Summary

The core purpose of this legislative proposal is to impose stricter criteria on how energy conservation standards are developed and implemented for various products. This includes a variety of household and commercial products that consume energy or water. The bill outlines a comprehensive process that the Secretary of Energy must follow, ensuring that new standards are financially viable for consumers and technologically possible. Additionally, the bill specifies that any changes to these standards should not inadvertently increase consumer costs or diminish product performance.

Significant Issues

One prominent issue with the bill is the exclusion of social costs related to greenhouse gas emissions from the Secretary's consideration when setting standards. This exclusion could lead to neglecting broader environmental concerns at a time when climate change is a significant policy focus. Moreover, the complexity involved in determining whether a standard is economically justified could lead to challenges and delays in implementation. There's also an absence of mechanisms for incorporating consumer advocacy and public input into the decision-making process, which might undermine transparency and public trust.

Another point of concern is the restrictive criteria for energy conservation standards, which might limit adaptability and responsiveness to evolving technology and market needs. Additionally, the technical amendments made in the bill are difficult to interpret without further context, which could lead to legal and regulatory misunderstandings.

Potential Impact on the Public

For the general public, the bill aims to ensure that energy conservation standards do not impose additional financial burdens on consumers while attempting to maintain product quality and availability. However, the lack of consideration for environmental impacts might mean lost opportunities for more sustainable energy use policies, potentially affecting long-term environmental benefits and the overall energy landscape.

Impact on Stakeholders

Consumers: If implemented as intended, the bill could protect consumers from higher upfront costs and reduced product utility, which is beneficial in the short term. However, the exclusion of potential environmental benefits could have indirect future costs related to climate and environmental health.

Manufacturers: The bill might lead to fewer regulatory hurdles when introducing new products, providing a positive impact by allowing greater flexibility. However, manufacturers might face uncertainties due to the potentially burdensome analyses required to prove economic justification and technological feasibility.

Environmental Advocates: The bill's stance on disregarding greenhouse gas impacts could be perceived negatively by environmental groups. These organizations may argue that effective energy policy should integrate broader climate considerations to ensure long-term sustainability.

In summary, while the "Hands Off Our Home Appliances Act" intends to deliver consumer-friendly policies, its restrictive approach toward social and environmental considerations may hinder comprehensive energy and conservation policy development. Ensuring robust stakeholder engagement and balancing immediate economic concerns with long-term environmental impacts could improve the bill's applicability and efficacy.

Issues

  • The requirement that the Secretary's decisions regarding energy conservation standards should not be based on estimates of social costs or social benefits associated with incremental greenhouse gas emissions could lead to a disregard of broader environmental impacts, which could be of concern given the current focus on climate policy. (Section 2)

  • The language and criteria for determining whether an energy conservation standard is economically justified are complex and involve numerous factors. This complexity might lead to misinterpretation or misuse by those responsible for implementing the standards, and could result in delays. (Section 2)

  • The exclusion of specific provisions for stakeholder input, particularly from consumer advocacy groups in the decision-making process for determining economic justification and technological feasibility, could limit transparency and reduce public trust. (Section 2)

  • The narrowly defined criteria, such as the requirement for significant conservation results, might restrict the flexibility needed to adapt standards in response to new technological developments or changing market conditions. (Section 2)

  • The amendments, particularly the striking or inserting of text without providing context on the changes, may lead to confusion or misinterpretation regarding the impact and intention of these amendments. This lack of clarity could pose legal and regulatory challenges. (Section 3)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name of the legislation is the "Hands Off Our Home Appliances Act."

2. Prescribing new or amended energy conservation standards Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes updates to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, allowing the Secretary of Energy to propose new or amended energy standards, consider petitions to change or revoke standards based on specific criteria like consumer costs and energy efficiency, and conduct analyses to ensure standards are both economically justified and technologically feasible. It aims to improve energy and water conservation while considering consumer impacts and technological advancements.

3. Conforming amendments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, several technical amendments are made to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. These include changing references from “this paragraph” to “this subsection” and revising terminology related to energy conservation standards, as well as removing a subsection about high-intensity discharge lamps and other equipment.