Overview
Title
To require coordination among Federal agencies on regulatory actions that affect the reliable operation of the bulk-power system.
ELI5 AI
The GRID Act is a new rule that wants different parts of the government to talk to each other when making big changes that could mess up electricity systems, like the power lines that bring electricity to homes. It makes sure everyone shares their ideas and reasons, so nobody accidentally causes a big power problem and everyone can see what's happening.
Summary AI
H.R. 6185, titled the "Guaranteeing Reliable Infrastructure Development Act" or the "GRID Act," seeks to enhance coordination among Federal agencies when they propose regulations that could significantly impact the reliability of the bulk-power system in North America. It requires Federal agencies to share their proposed actions with the Commission and consider its feedback to prevent negative impacts on power reliability. The bill also mandates that agencies make the Commission's comments and their responses publicly available, ensuring transparency and accountability in the regulatory process.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known formally as the "Guaranteeing Reliable Infrastructure Development Act" or "GRID Act," seeks to enhance coordination among Federal agencies for regulatory actions affecting the bulk-power system's reliability. This bill amends the Federal Power Act by mandating a review process in which proposed actions by Federal agencies, suspected to have a significant impact on the reliability of North America's bulk-power system, must be evaluated by the Commission. The goal is to ensure that such actions do not negatively affect the power grid's reliability.
Significant Issues
The bill introduces several significant administrative requirements. Perhaps the most critical is the broad characterization of what constitutes a "covered agency action," which encompasses rules, regulations, standards, and more. This might inadvertently result in an overwhelming influx of proposals requiring Commission review, stretching available resources thin.
Additionally, the lack of specific deadlines for the Commission to provide comments could introduce delays into the regulatory process. The language used in Section 2 is somewhat subjective, utilizing terms like "significant negative impact," which could lead to varied interpretations and inconsistent application across different scenarios. Lastly, the requirement for agency heads to provide written responses to Commission comments could contribute to administrative slowdowns, impacting the timeliness of necessary regulatory actions.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
For the general public, the bill could represent a double-edged sword. On one hand, it promises greater reliability of the bulk-power system by ensuring that all significant regulatory actions undergo careful scrutiny. This could lead to fewer disruptions and inconsistencies in power supply, boosting public confidence.
However, the potential delays caused by the added administrative procedures could slow down the implementation of beneficial regulations. If the Commission becomes overwhelmed with responsibilities, it might struggle to maintain the promptness needed for effective energy regulation, which could indirectly affect energy availability and prices.
Specific stakeholders, such as Federal agencies, might face increased scrutiny and a heavier bureaucratic burden due to the necessity of justifying their proposals and responding to Commission feedback. This could delay agency initiatives, affecting their ability to respond swiftly to emerging issues in the energy sector.
In conclusion, while the GRID Act is poised to reinforce the reliability of the nation's bulk-power systems through enhanced oversight, it could also introduce inefficiencies that need careful management. Balancing the need for thorough review with efficient and timely decision-making will be crucial to maximizing the bill’s benefits for all stakeholders involved.
Issues
The broad definition of 'covered agency action' in Section 2 could lead to a large number of proposals requiring Commission review, potentially overwhelming resources and causing inefficiencies.
The lack of specific timelines for the Commission to provide comments on proposed actions in Section 2 may result in delays in the regulatory process, affecting the timely implementation of necessary actions to maintain electric reliability.
The subjective language, such as 'significant negative impact' used in Section 2, could lead to interpretative ambiguities, which might hinder the consistent application of the coordination process across different scenarios.
The requirement for written responses from agency heads to the Commission's comments as described in Section 2 could create administrative burdens and slow down decision-making processes, potentially affecting the responsiveness of regulatory actions needed for electric reliability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act specifies its short title, indicating that it can be referred to as the “Guaranteeing Reliable Infrastructure Development Act” or simply the “GRID Act.”
2. Coordination process to protect electric reliability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 2 of the bill amends the Federal Power Act to require that any proposed agency action, likely to impact the reliability of North America's bulk-power system significantly, must be reviewed by the Commission. The agency proposing the action must provide written responses to the Commission's comments, and these must be made publicly accessible to ensure transparency before any final decision is made.