Overview
Title
An Act To improve the biodetection functions of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 6174 wants to help the Department of Homeland Security find better ways to detect harmful germs by working with scientists and special labs. It tells them to make a plan for using new tools and to tell Congress how it's going.
Summary AI
H.R. 6174, titled the “DHS Biodetection Improvement Act”, aims to enhance the biodetection capabilities of the Department of Homeland Security. The bill mandates the Secretary of Homeland Security to assess and improve partnerships with the Department of Energy's national laboratories to address research and development needs in biodetection. It requires developing strategies to identify viable biodetection technologies, acquiring them, and facilitating evaluations and plans for technology gaps. The Secretary must report to Congress on the progress of these initiatives within a year of the bill's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "DHS Biodetection Improvement Act," seeks to enhance the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) biodetection capabilities. It mandates the DHS Secretary to evaluate how the department has worked with the Department of Energy's national laboratories on research and development projects aligned with the DHS's missions. Furthermore, the bill requires the creation of a strategy for improving biodetection research and technology, which must be submitted to Congress within 180 days of the bill's enactment. The strategy should cover technology identification, acquisition planning, performance evaluation, and collaboration with federal, state, local, and tribal governments, as well as other institutions and the private sector. Additionally, the DHS must report on its progress and address any challenges within one year.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill raises several significant issues primarily centered around practical execution and financial concerns. It does not specify a budget for the proposed activities, which could lead to unchecked or wasteful spending. The tight deadline of 180 days for submitting a comprehensive strategy may result in rushed analysis and suboptimal planning. There's also a lack of a clear coordination framework among the many stakeholders involved, risking inefficiencies in implementation. The vague language describing performance evaluations and contingency plans might lead to inadequate preparedness and assessments of the technologies. Finally, the lack of performance metrics could hinder the proper evaluation of the project's success, and reliance on future studies poses a risk of delays if those studies aren’t ready or conclusive.
Impact on the Public
The bill aims to improve national security by enhancing biodetection capabilities, potentially benefiting the general public through better preparedness against biological threats. However, if execution issues such as inefficiencies and lack of coordination occur, the public might experience minimal improvements relative to the spending involved. Taxpayers could bear the financial burden of any unchecked expenses due to the lack of budget specifications in the bill.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Several stakeholders could be directly impacted by this bill. The DHS and Department of Energy's national laboratories might face increased workloads and pressure to deliver under tight deadlines. Collaborating governmental bodies, educational institutions, and private sector partners may encounter challenges due to the lack of specified coordination and conflict resolution frameworks, affecting their operational effectiveness.
On the positive side, if successfully implemented, these biodetection improvements could enhance public health and safety by providing quicker responses to biological threats. Educational institutions and private sector companies collaborating on these projects might also benefit through funding, research opportunities, and the potential for technological innovations.
Overall, while the bill aims to fortify national security, the lack of clarity and specific guidelines within the bill could pose challenges to achieving its goals effectively and economically.
Issues
The section on DHS utilization of Department of Energy national laboratories and sites for biodetection research and development (Section 2) does not specify the budget or funding allocated for these activities, raising concerns about potential unchecked or wasteful spending that could ultimately impact taxpayers significantly.
Section 2 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit an assessment and strategy within 180 days, which might be challenging due to the complexity of the tasks, possibly leading to rushed or superficial analyses. This raises concerns about the quality and effectiveness of the strategy developed under these constraints.
The lack of a clear coordination or conflict resolution framework among federal, state, local, and tribal governments, institutions of higher education, and the private sector could lead to inefficiencies in the implementation of the biodetection programs as outlined in Section 2.
The language in Section 2 describing 'periodic external evaluations' and 'contingency plans' is vague, which may lead to inadequate evaluations or preparedness measures, potentially compromising the effectiveness of biodetection technologies.
Section 2 lacks specific performance metrics or benchmarks to evaluate the success of biodetection technologies, resulting in potential accountability and effectiveness measurement challenges. This could affect public trust and the perceived success of the project's implementation.
The reliance on future studies and assessments, such as those by the Comptroller General, to inform biodetection technology needs as mentioned in Section 2, could delay decision-making and implementation processes if those studies are not timely or conclusive.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it will be known as the “DHS Biodetection Improvement Act.”
2. DHS utilization of Department of Energy national laboratories and sites for certain biodetection research and development relating to the missions of the DHS Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that the Secretary of Homeland Security must evaluate how the Department has used the Department of Energy’s national labs for research related to its missions. Within 180 days of the act's enactment, a strategy should be submitted to Congress on improving biodetection technology research and development, including technology identification, acquisition plans, performance evaluations, and collaboration with various governments and organizations. Additionally, there should be a report to Congress on the progress and challenges within one year.