Overview

Title

To facilitate access to swiftly transport goods during a publicly announced state of emergency situation.

ELI5 AI

The FAST PASS Act is like a plan for making sure important things like food and medicine get places quickly when there's an emergency, but it decides not to use robots if they make people lose their jobs, and makes sure people working at ports keep their agreements.

Summary AI

H.R. 6140, also known as the FAST PASS Act, aims to improve the transportation of essential goods during emergencies. It directs the Secretary of Transportation to study and develop methods to speed up the movement of important cargo through ports and across all transportation modes. The bill also allows for pilot programs to test these methods but prohibits using fully automated cargo-handling equipment that might lead to job losses. Additionally, it ensures existing port labor agreements remain unaffected.

Published

2024-11-26
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-11-26
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6140rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
902
Pages:
8
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 268
Verbs: 77
Adjectives: 32
Adverbs: 16
Numbers: 38
Entities: 49

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.28
Average Sentence Length:
64.43
Token Entropy:
4.94
Readability (ARI):
34.34

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, House of Representatives Bill 6140, titled the "Facilitating Access to Swiftly Transport Goods during a Publicly Announced State of Emergency Situation Act," also known as the "FAST PASS Act," aims to address the efficiency of transporting goods during emergency situations. The bill mandates a study by the Secretary of Transportation to explore methods for accelerating the movement of crucial cargo through ports and across various transportation modalities during a declared emergency. Additionally, it outlines the creation of voluntary pilot programs to test expedited cargo movement methodologies and safeguards existing port labor agreements from being overridden by the Act.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues merit attention regarding this bill. Firstly, the term "critical cargo" is not explicitly defined, which may lead to uncertainties or discrepancies in implementation, particularly in determining which goods qualify for expedited transport during an emergency. Additionally, the bill lacks specific budgetary details or cost estimates for the proposed study and pilot programs, raising concerns about potential uncontrolled or inefficient allocation of resources. Furthermore, the defined timeline for conducting the study could be considered lengthy, resulting in possible delays before any derived benefits are realized. The scope and nature of the required consultations with other federal agencies are vaguely articulated, possibly leading to ambiguities regarding agency responsibilities. Lastly, limitations concerning job impact and automation within the pilot programs might present oversight challenges and lead to interpretative ambiguities.

Impact on the Public

The bill's intent to streamline and expedite the movement of goods during emergencies has the potential to impact the public positively, particularly by ensuring critical supplies are delivered swiftly to affected areas. However, the ambiguity surrounding key terms and the absence of defined budgetary provisions may result in confusion and ineffective allocation of resources. This, in turn, could influence the efficiency with which the law achieves its intended goals, potentially affecting citizens' access to necessary goods during crises.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For ports and related transportation sectors, the bill could offer opportunities to improve operational efficiencies and establish strategies for handling critical cargo during emergencies. However, stakeholders might face challenges due to the lack of clarity regarding what qualifies as "critical cargo," which could lead to operational inconsistencies or disputes over implementation. Labor groups within ports may appreciate the savings clause, which assures that existing port labor agreements remain unaltered. Nevertheless, they may also seek further clarification on how the Act interacts with labor dynamics during pilot programs, particularly concerning automation and job security.

Overall, while the FAST PASS Act proposes important steps towards resolving logistical challenges during emergencies, its success largely depends on clarifying key terms, ensuring transparent financial planning, and establishing clear lines of responsibility among federal entities. By addressing these issues, the bill could better serve its purpose and assure timely delivery of essential goods in emergency situations.

Issues

  • The definition and criteria for identifying 'critical cargo' are not clearly specified in Section 2, making it ambiguous and potentially problematic for implementation, leading to confusion about what goods qualify for expedited movement during emergencies.

  • Section 2 lacks budgetary details or cost estimates for the study on critical cargo, posing risks of uncontrolled spending or resource allocation without oversight, which could impact taxpayers financially.

  • The timeline in Section 2 for conducting and reporting the study findings (1 year to initiate and 2 years to report) might be seen as lengthy, potentially delaying benefits or improvements that the study aims to achieve during emergencies.

  • Section 3 does not provide detailed criteria for expediting the movement of critical cargo through pilot programs, leaving room for interpretation and potential inconsistency in the application, raising concerns about the uniformity and fairness of the pilot programs.

  • The requirement for consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies in Section 2 is vague in terms of the scope and nature of the consultation, potentially leading to unclear responsibilities and lack of accountability among agencies.

  • The limitations imposed on the pilot programs in Section 3 regarding job losses and automation are not fully addressed, potentially leading to oversight challenges and ambiguity regarding the monitoring and evaluation of such impacts.

  • Section 4's savings clause is vague, as it only broadly states non-interference with port labor agreements without specifying scope or application, leading to legal interpretations and potential conflicts with existing agreements.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section introduces the FAST PASS Act, formally known as the "Facilitating Access to Swiftly Transport Goods during a Publicly Announced State of Emergency Situation Act," and states that this is the name by which the Act may be referred to.

2. Study on critical cargo Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Transportation must start a study within one year on ways to speed up the movement of important cargo through ports and during emergencies. This includes examining various methods and consulting with other federal agencies, with the goal of creating a report with findings and recommendations within two years.

3. Pilot program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes that the Secretary can start voluntary pilot programs to test ways to speed up moving important cargo through ports. These programs must not involve buying fully automated cargo equipment or lead to job losses at ports.

4. Savings clause Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This part of the bill makes it clear that nothing in the law should be understood as changing or affecting existing agreements regarding port labor.