Overview

Title

To provide for the standardization, consolidation, and publication of data relating to public outdoor recreational use of Federal waterways among Federal land and water management agencies, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

Imagine there are big rivers and lakes that people like to visit, and this new bill is like a special rulebook to help make sure everyone knows where they can fish or boat safely. It wants to put all the important water rules online for everyone to see, and it needs money and help from different groups to do that.

Summary AI

H.R. 6127, known as the “Modernizing Access to Our Public Waters Act” or the “MAPWaters Act,” aims to standardize, consolidate, and publish data about public outdoor recreational use of federal waterways across various federal management agencies. The bill requires the digitization and online publication of data regarding federal waterway restrictions, fishing restrictions, and access information within four years. It encourages partnerships with non-federal entities for data sharing and mandates regular updates and public access to this information. The bill also authorizes appropriations to support these initiatives through fiscal year 2027.

Published

2023-11-01
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2023-11-01
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6127ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
8
Words:
1,719
Pages:
9
Sentences:
29

Language

Nouns: 516
Verbs: 91
Adjectives: 112
Adverbs: 22
Numbers: 60
Entities: 108

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.32
Average Sentence Length:
59.28
Token Entropy:
5.00
Readability (ARI):
31.83

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 6127, also known as the "Modernizing Access to Our Public Waters Act" or the "MAPWaters Act," is a legislative proposal that seeks to improve the management and accessibility of data related to the public's use of federal waterways. The bill mandates that federal agencies standardize, consolidate, and publish geospatial information regarding outdoor recreational use and fishing restrictions on these waterways. A key component of the measure is the requirement for relevant federal bodies, such as the Bureau of Reclamation, the National Park Service, and others, to digitize this data and make it publicly accessible online. The bill also outlines the procedures for cooperating with state agencies, private partners, and non-profits to meet its objectives.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill presents several issues that merit consideration:

  1. Lengthy Implementation Timeline: The bill allows a four-year timeframe for the digitization and publicizing of data, which may slow access to critical information that could benefit recreational users of federal waterways.

  2. Ambiguity in Definitions: Certain definitions, such as "Federal fishing restriction," could lead to confusion as they are somewhat vague. Clarity in legal terms is essential to prevent misunderstandings or misapplications.

  3. Significant Appropriations Without Detailed Guidelines: The bill authorizes substantial financial appropriations for federal agencies without detailed explanations of fund allocation, which raises the risk of inefficient spending or mismanagement.

  4. Lack of Oversight and Accountability: The absence of clear oversight measures, particularly in the development of interagency standards and the selection of third-party partnerships, might lead to implementation inefficiencies.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact:

The MAPWaters Act can significantly benefit the general public by enhancing access to detailed, up-to-date information about federal waterways, potentially boosting recreational activities. The digitalization of data will allow users to easily find information about waterway restrictions, boat access points, and fishing regulations, thus promoting informed and safe enjoyment of natural resources.

However, potential delays in implementation due to a lengthy timeline may mean that these benefits are not realized in a timely fashion. Additionally, the complexity of the bill's language may challenge non-specialist understanding, potentially limiting accessibility for laypersons.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders:

  • Recreational Users and Environmental Advocates: Users such as boaters and anglers are likely to benefit from improved information access, which can enhance recreational planning and safety. Environmental advocates may also see benefits from more transparent data regarding waterway and fishing restrictions.

  • Federal and State Agencies: These agencies may face significant operational challenges. While they stand to gain from better-coordinated data, they will need to address potential resource strains due to the digitization mandate and real-time data update requirements.

  • Private Sector Partners: Technology and geospatial data companies may find new business opportunities through partnerships with federal agencies. However, concerns about favoritism and lack of clear criteria for partner selection may arise.

  • Tribal and Local Governments: These entities may need to collaborate effectively within specified guidelines to ensure that cultural and archaeological data are protected during the digitization process.

The MAPWaters Act represents a significant step towards improving access to federal waterway data, but careful consideration of the outlined issues is necessary to ensure that its implementation is efficient, equitable, and aligned with stakeholders' needs.

Financial Assessment

The Modernizing Access to Our Public Waters Act (H.R. 6127) includes financial provisions that authorize funding for the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to implement the various components of the bill. This commentary seeks to examine these financial references in detail.

Financial Allocations and Appropriations

The bill authorizes specific amounts to facilitate the standardization, consolidation, and publication of data related to public outdoor recreational use of federal waterways. For the Secretary of the Interior, the appropriations are set at $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2024, and $6,000,000 annually for each of the fiscal years 2025 through 2027. Similarly, for the Secretary of Agriculture, the bill allocates $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2024 and $4,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2025 through 2027. These allocations are intended to support activities such as digitizing and publishing data, enhancing interagency collaboration, and involving third-party entities where necessary.

Relation to Identified Issues

One notable issue related to these financial allocations is the potential for financial inefficiency due to the lack of detailed guidance on how these funds should be utilized. The amounts, while significant, are not accompanied by specific allocation guidelines, which can lead to ineffective use if not properly managed. The bill does not outline a structured protocol for spending, which might raise concerns about oversight and accountability in fund utilization.

Additionally, the issue of no specified performance metrics or expected outcomes tied to these appropriations heightens this concern. Without clear metrics, evaluating the effectiveness of the spending might prove challenging, as there would be no established benchmarks or criteria to gauge the success or efficiency of the initiatives funded through these appropriations.

Furthermore, the requirement for real-time data updates, particularly concerning federal fishing restrictions, could demand substantial technical resources. This requirement could elevate costs beyond the current budget allocations, suggesting a possible risk of underestimating the financial needs or resource allocation required.

Overall, while the appropriations stipulated in H.R. 6127 are aimed at facilitating the objectives of the bill, the absence of detailed financial guidelines and performance measures raises potential issues related to financial management and accountability. The effectiveness and transparency of these significant sums depend heavily on the development of structured spending strategies and the establishment of accountability mechanisms.

Issues

  • The timeline for digitizing and making data available online is lengthy, with a 4-year period potentially delaying public access to important information. This issue is found in Section 4.

  • The authorization of appropriations involves significant sums ($3,000,000 and $6,000,000 annually for the Secretary of the Interior and $2,000,000 and $4,000,000 for the Secretary of Agriculture, respectively) without detailed allocation guidelines, which could lead to financial inefficiency. This is detailed in Section 7.

  • The section on Definitions (Section 2) contains ambiguous terms such as 'Federal fishing restriction' and 'temporarily or permanently,' which may lead to misunderstandings about enforcement and communication of fishing restrictions.

  • The bill lacks oversight or accountability measures regarding the development of interagency standards, potentially leading to inefficiencies (Section 3).

  • The provision allowing partnerships and agreements with third parties in Section 5 lacks details on scope, limitations, or oversight, raising concerns about accountability and transparency.

  • There is no specification of performance metrics or expected outcomes related to the appropriations, which could hamper the evaluation of spending effectiveness (Section 7).

  • The requirement to update Federal fishing restrictions data in real time (Section 4) could incur high costs and technical challenges, impacting feasibility and resource allocation.

  • The reports section (Section 6) does not specify the consequences of failing to report, potentially undermining accountability.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The MAPWaters Act stands for the "Modernizing Access to Our Public Waters Act." It is the official short title of the legislative act.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section of the text defines key terms used in the Act, including what constitutes a "Federal fishing restriction," "Federal land or water management agency," "Federal waterway," "Federal waterway restriction," and "Secretaries," which refers to specific government officials responsible for managing these areas.

3. Interagency data standardization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires that within 30 months of the Act's enactment, the Secretaries must work together to create and implement interagency standards. These standards aim to ensure that federal databases can effectively share and use geospatial data about public outdoor recreational activities on federal waterways and fishing restrictions.

4. Data consolidation and publication Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that within four years, federal agencies must digitize and make available online detailed information about waterways, including restrictions, access points, and fishing guidelines. It also mandates regular updates, allows for public feedback, and specifies that sensitive historical or archaeological data should not be disclosed.

5. Cooperation and coordination Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section explains that the Secretaries can collaborate with various community partners, non-Federal agencies, and private sector companies like technology and geospatial data firms to implement the Act. They can also work with the United States Geological Survey for data management and must ensure that any geospatial data shared complies with relevant laws.

6. Reports Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires that within one year of the law being passed, and every year after until 2033, the Secretaries must submit a report on their progress in fulfilling the law's requirements. These reports should be sent to specific committees in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

7. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes funding to be allocated to the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture for implementing the Act, with $3 million and $2 million, respectively, for fiscal year 2024, and $6 million and $4 million, respectively, for each fiscal year from 2025 through 2027.

Money References

  • There are authorized to be appropriated— (1) to the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this Act— (A) $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2024; and (B) $6,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2027; and (2) to the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out this Act— (A) $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2024; and (B) $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2027. ---

8. Effect Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that this Act does not change the definition of "navigable waters" under federal law, nor does it impact the authority of state or federal agencies to regulate these waters or manage fisheries.