Overview

Title

An Act To require online dating service providers to provide fraud ban notifications to online dating service members, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6125 is a new rule saying that if someone on a dating app was kicked off because they might be tricking people, the app has to tell everyone who talked to them. This is to help keep people safe online.

Summary AI

H.R. 6125 seeks to enhance online dating safety by requiring dating service providers to notify members if they've communicated with someone banned for potential fraudulent activity. These notifications must include details like the banned person's username and advice against sending money. The Federal Trade Commission will enforce this rule, and states can also take legal action if needed. The law will establish a unified national standard and is set to take effect one year after its enactment.

Published

2024-09-23
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2024-09-23
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6125eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,827
Pages:
12
Sentences:
35

Language

Nouns: 575
Verbs: 144
Adjectives: 72
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 48
Entities: 75

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.26
Average Sentence Length:
52.20
Token Entropy:
5.04
Readability (ARI):
28.37

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, known as the "Online Dating Safety Act of 2023," seeks to enhance user security on online dating platforms by mandating service providers to notify members if they have received messages from users banned for fraudulent activities. By incorporating a standardized notification process, the bill aims to prevent potential scams and protect users from financial exploitation. Key components include detailed requirements for the content and timing of these notifications, along with enforcement responsibilities entrusted to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and individual states.

General Summary of the Bill

This bill primarily focuses on improving safety measures within online dating services by obligating providers to inform members when they have interacted with users banned for fraud. It outlines how notifications should be communicated, insists on transparency about the banned user's identity and activities, and offers guidance to members on avoiding scams. Crucially, the bill enforces a federal standard for these notifications, overriding any conflicting state laws, to ensure consistency nationwide.

Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from the bill that are worthy of discussion:

  1. Impact on Small Businesses: The requirement for all online dating services to issue fraud ban notifications might disproportionately affect smaller providers, which may lack the resources to comply effectively.

  2. Federalism Concerns: By preempting state laws regarding fraud notifications, the bill raises questions about federal versus state authority. This overarching preemption could potentially clash with state-level consumer protection laws.

  3. FTC Enforcement Powers: The broad authority granted to the FTC to enforce these provisions lacks precise guidance, possibly leading to unpredictable enforcement practices and regulatory uncertainty for providers.

  4. Timing of Notifications: The bill allows for delays in fraud notifications due to law enforcement needs, which could hinder timely protection for users, leaving them vulnerable to ongoing scams.

  5. Ambiguity in Definitions: Terms such as "significant risk" and "clear and conspicuous" in the bill are vague, inviting inconsistent application and interpretation across different platforms.

Public Impact

For the general public, this bill represents an effort to increase safety and trust within online dating environments by providing critical alerts about potential fraud. If implemented effectively, users could be better informed and thus more cautious in their interactions, potentially reducing the number of people who fall victim to scams.

Impact on Stakeholders

Positive Impacts:

  • Consumers: On the consumer side, users of online dating platforms would have a safety net in place that alerts them to fraud attempts. This protection could foster a safer and more reliable environment for those seeking meaningful connections online.

  • Law Enforcement: The collaboration between online providers and law enforcement agencies could enhance investigative processes and help to combat online fraud on a broader scale.

Negative Impacts:

  • Small Online Dating Providers: Smaller companies might face financial and operational strain to meet the notification requirements, possibly placing them at a competitive disadvantage against larger companies with more resources.

  • State Authorities: States might find their consumer protection efforts hamstrung by the federal override, limiting their ability to enact and enforce local measures tailored to specific regional needs.

In conclusion, while the "Online Dating Safety Act of 2023" offers promising steps towards safer interactions on dating platforms, the execution will need careful consideration of resource constraints for small businesses and the balance of federal and state powers to ensure it achieves its protective goals effectively.

Issues

  • The requirement for online dating service providers to send fraud ban notifications could impose burdens on smaller providers, potentially affecting their financial viability or operations. This issue is pertinent in Section 2(a)(1) and reflects broader economic concerns related to the impact on small businesses.

  • The provision in Section 2(d) that prohibits states from enforcing their own laws concerning fraud notifications without exceptions raises federalism concerns. This stipulation limits state sovereignty and could conflict with existing state laws designed to protect consumers.

  • The broad authority granted to the Federal Trade Commission in Section 2(b) without clear guidance on the use of enforcement powers could lead to inconsistent enforcement actions. This lack of specificity may result in legal ambiguities and operational challenges for online dating service providers.

  • The timing requirements for sending fraud notifications in Section 2(a)(3) include exceptions that might allow for extended delays during law enforcement investigations, potentially reducing the effectiveness of preventing ongoing fraud. This delay could expose users to prolonged risk without sufficient safeguards.

  • The definition of 'significant risk' in Section 2(e)(3) in relation to fraud bans is vague, which could lead to inconsistent application across different online dating services. Clearer criteria would improve enforcement and compliance.

  • The term 'clear and conspicuous' used in Section 2(a)(3)(A) for the manner of providing notifications is subjective, leading to potential inconsistencies in implementation and interpretation across various providers.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section titled "Short title" states that the law can be referred to as the "Online Dating Safety Act of 2023."

2. Online dating safety Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires online dating services to notify users if they receive messages from members banned for fraud, outlines the content and timeline for these notifications, and specifies enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission and states. It establishes that federal law will be the only law governing these notifications, and provides definitions for key terms like "banned member" and "fraud ban."