Overview

Title

An Act To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a task force to improve access to health care information technology for non-English speakers.

ELI5 AI

The SPEAK Act of 2024 is a plan to help people who don't speak English get better access to online health information by using translators and making health websites easier to understand in different languages. It asks a special group to make sure everyone can understand their health information, even if they speak a different language.

Summary AI

The Supporting Patient Education And Knowledge Act of 2024, also known as the SPEAK Act of 2024, aims to enhance access to health care information technology for non-English speakers. It mandates the Secretary of Health and Human Services to create guidance for improving telehealth services for individuals with limited English proficiency. This includes best practices for using interpreters, providing multilingual patient materials, and enhancing digital platforms like patient portals. The bill identifies various categories of entities, such as health care providers and language service companies, to collaborate in issuing this guidance.

Published

2024-09-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2024-09-17
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6033eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
556
Pages:
6
Sentences:
12

Language

Nouns: 184
Verbs: 36
Adjectives: 39
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 29
Entities: 32

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.55
Average Sentence Length:
46.33
Token Entropy:
4.80
Readability (ARI):
26.45

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The "Supporting Patient Education And Knowledge Act of 2024," or the "SPEAK Act of 2024," is a legislative proposal from the United States Congress aimed at enhancing access to healthcare information technology for non-English speakers. The bill necessitates that the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) convene a task force or issue guidance to facilitate the use of telehealth services by individuals with limited English proficiency. The guidance is expected to cover best practices for utilizing interpreters, improving access to digital patient portals, integrating video platforms for interpretation, and making multilingual patient materials available.

Summary of Significant Issues

While the bill aspires to address a pressing need in the healthcare sector, several substantial issues have been identified:

  1. Budget Concerns: The bill does not specify budgetary constraints or spending limits for the issuing and dissemination of the proposed guidance. This omission raises concerns about potential wasteful spending without checks or balances.

  2. Timeliness and Delays: No detailed timeline or deadline is imposed for each step in the consultation, issuance, and dissemination process. This lack of specific timelines might result in prolonged delays, hindering the intended benefits of the bill.

  3. Consultation Process: The method by which consultations with multiple entities are to be carried out remains undefined. This ambiguity could lead to biased outcomes, especially if conflicts of interest are not adequately managed.

  4. Defining "Best Practices": The bill's language surrounding "best practices" lacks clarity and precision, potentially resulting in guidance that is not sufficiently actionable for stakeholders.

  5. Biased Favoritism: The bill might inadvertently favor companies with existing multi-language capacities, potentially disadvantaging new or smaller entities attempting to enter this space.

  6. Accountability and Implementation: There is no clear mechanism to ensure the effective implementation of the guidance, potentially leaving lapses in improving healthcare IT access for non-English speakers unaddressed.

  7. Clarity and Understanding: References to telecommunications systems require additional clarification for accessibility, particularly regarding their context in the Social Security Act.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill seeks to bridge a significant gap in healthcare accessibility for non-English speakers, thereby potentially improving health outcomes for this segment of the population. By making telehealth services more inclusive, non-English speaking individuals could access timely medical consultations without language barriers, substantially enhancing their healthcare experience.

Stakeholder Impacts

Positive Impacts:

  • Non-English Speaking Patients: The bill could greatly benefit patients who face language barriers, ensuring they receive clear communication and appropriate care. Access to interpreters and multilingual resources might lead to better patient comprehension and adherence to treatment plans.

  • Healthcare Providers: With well-defined guidance, healthcare providers could improve their service offerings, enhance patient satisfaction, and potentially reduce miscommunications that lead to medical errors.

Negative Impacts:

  • Small Companies or New Entrants: Companies without established multi-language services might find it challenging to compete if existing companies are favored, potentially reducing business opportunities and innovation in this sector.

  • Healthcare Costs: If not carefully managed, the introduction of multilingual telehealth systems might increase operational costs for healthcare providers, which could be passed down to consumers.

In conclusion, while the SPEAK Act of 2024 aims to address an important need within the healthcare system, careful consideration of the identified issues is crucial to effectively implement and balance the interests of all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • The bill lacks a clear definition of the budget or spending limits for issuing and disseminating the guidance on telehealth services for individuals with limited English proficiency, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending. [Section 2]

  • There is no specific timeline or deadline set for each step in the process of consultation, issuance, and dissemination of guidance, which could lead to significant delays in implementation. [Section 2]

  • The guidance issuance process involves consultation with multiple entities, but there is a lack of clarity on how these consultations will be conducted and how conflicts of interest will be managed, potentially leading to biased outcomes. [Section 2]

  • The language used in the bill lacks precision in defining what constitutes 'best practices,' which could result in ineffective guidance that is not actionable for improving telehealth services for non-English speakers. [Section 2]

  • The bill could potentially favor companies that already offer multi-language services, creating a bias that makes it difficult for new or smaller companies to compete if contractual obligations arise from this section. [Section 2]

  • There is no clear mechanism for accountability or follow-up to ensure that the guidance is being implemented effectively, leading to potential lapses in improving access to health care IT for non-English speakers. [Section 2]

  • References to telecommunication systems in the context of the Social Security Act could benefit from a brief, clear explanation to enhance understanding and avoid confusion. [Section 2]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act states that the short title of the bill is the “Supporting Patient Education And Knowledge Act of 2024” or simply the “SPEAK Act of 2024”.

2. Guidance on furnishing services via telehealth to individuals with limited English proficiency Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue guidance within one year on best practices for using telehealth services with individuals who have limited English proficiency. This includes recommendations on interpreters, access to telecommunications and digital portals, video platforms for interpretation, and providing materials in multiple languages, with consultation from various entities like health providers, insurers, and language service companies.