Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to notify applicants of the completion status of right-of-way applications under section 501 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure that when someone asks to use public land for things like building roads or pipes, the government must tell them within 90 days if they have everything needed to start or what they need to add. This helps keep things clear and fair.
Summary AI
H.R. 6011, also known as the "Right-Of-Way Application Transparency and Accountability Act" or the "ROWATA Act," requires the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to inform applicants about the status of their right-of-way applications. Not later than 90 days after receiving an application, the relevant Secretary must notify the applicant whether their application is complete or specify what information is missing. This legislation aims to ensure clarity and accountability in the process of handling right-of-way applications under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and the Mineral Leasing Act.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill under consideration seeks to streamline the process for handling applications for rights-of-way on public lands and National Forest System lands in the United States. It is known formally as the "Right-Of-Way Application Transparency and Accountability Act," or simply the "ROWATA Act." The legislation mandates that the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture notify applicants about the status of their right-of-way applications within 90 days. Rights-of-way, in this context, refer to the legal rights to pass through property owned by another entity, here specifically under defined federal laws.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several areas of concern:
Lack of Consequences for Missing Deadlines: While the bill requires notification within 90 days, it does not specify consequences if this deadline is not met. This ambiguity may lead to delays and lack of accountability.
Complex Legal References: The definitions within the bill rely heavily on existing sections of U.S. law, potentially causing confusion for those unfamiliar with legal jargon.
Limited Definition of Authority: The term "Secretary concerned" is defined strictly, without acknowledging any additional authorities or exceptions that might impact decision-making.
Absence of Appeals Procedure: There is no formal process outlined for applicants to appeal or object decisions, which could negatively affect perceived fairness and accountability.
Vague Purpose and Scope: The "Short Title" section does not detail the broader goals, funding, or implementation plans of the Act, leaving stakeholders to speculate on its full impact.
Impact on the Public
Generally, this bill could have both positive and negative implications for the public. On the positive side, expedited processes and clear communication regarding the status of applications could enhance efficiency and transparency. This might be particularly beneficial for businesses and individuals seeking to develop land or projects that require crossing public lands.
Conversely, the lack of clarity regarding missed deadlines and the absence of an appeals process could lead to enhanced frustration and delays for applicants. This lack of detail may result in inconsistent experiences for different applicants and potentially discourage some stakeholders from engaging in processes involving rights-of-way.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For business stakeholders, particularly those in industries such as energy, telecommunications, and transportation, the Act's emphasis on transparency could facilitate more predictable project planning and execution. This could encourage investment and development across sectors dependent on rights-of-way.
However, individuals and smaller organizations might find the legal complexity and procedural omissions daunting, potentially leading to additional administrative burdens. Environmental and public interest groups might express concerns over expedited processes, fearing that they might compromise regulatory scrutiny and environmental safeguards.
In essence, while the ROWATA Act aims to enhance efficiency and accountability, careful attention to the identified issues could ensure that it serves its intended purpose without unintended negative consequences. Considering amendments to address these significant concerns might benefit the legislative process and those it is designed to serve.
Issues
The bill lacks clarity on the consequences or remedial actions if the Secretary concerned fails to notify applicants about the completion status of right-of-way applications within the stipulated 90-day period (Section 2a). This could lead to potential delays and confusion for applicants.
The definition of 'right-of-way' relies heavily on references to specific sections of U.S. law without providing broader context for laypersons, which may hinder understanding for individuals not familiar with legal texts (Section 2b(1)).
The term 'Secretary concerned' is defined without mentioning any contingencies or additional authorities involved in decision-making beyond the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture. This could limit the understanding of who else might be involved or have authority (Section 2b(2)).
There is no explicit procedure for appeals or objections to decisions regarding the completeness of a right-of-way application, which could be important for maintaining fairness and accountability in the decision process (Section 2).
The Short Title section lacks details on the act's purpose, funding, or implementation, which might prevent stakeholders from understanding the potential implications and scope of the 'Right-Of-Way Application Transparency and Accountability Act' (Section 1).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that the official name of the legislation is the "Right-Of-Way Application Transparency and Accountability Act," which can be shortened to "ROWATA Act."
2. Determination regarding rights-of-way Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the process for handling applications for rights-of-way on public and National Forest System lands. It defines the term "right-of-way" and identifies the "Secretary concerned" as either the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture, depending on the land type involved.