Overview
Title
An Act To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to notify applicants of the completion status of right-of-way applications under section 501 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to make sure that when someone asks for permission to use land owned by the government, the government tells them quickly if they have all the papers they need or if they need to give more information.
Summary AI
H.R. 6011, also known as the "Right-Of-Way Application Transparency and Accountability Act" or the "ROWATA Act," aims to streamline the process for applying for rights-of-way on public lands. The bill requires that within 90 days of receiving a right-of-way application, the relevant Secretary must inform the applicant whether their application is complete or if additional information is needed. It applies to rights-of-way under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and the Mineral Leasing Act, involving both the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
H.R. 6011, also known as the "Right-Of-Way Application Transparency and Accountability Act" or "ROWATA Act," addresses the process of handling applications for rights-of-way over public lands and National Forest System lands. The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to inform applicants about the status of their right-of-way applications. The notification must occur within 90 days of receiving the application, informing applicants whether their submission is complete or if additional information is needed. The legislation also clarifies the roles of the Secretaries concerning public lands and National Forest lands.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill raises several important issues regarding its implementation and effect:
Deadline Accountability: The requirement for notification within 90 days does not detail what happens if this deadline is not met. This absence of specified consequences could lead to uncertainty and prolonged delays for applicants.
Understanding Legal References: The bill references specific sections of U.S. law to define "right-of-way," which might be difficult for those not familiar with these legal frameworks to fully understand without additional context.
Appeals Process: There is no mention of an appeals or objection process for applicants who might disagree with the decision regarding the completeness of their application. This omission could limit applicants' options to contest decisions they might perceive as unfair.
Role Clarifications: While defining who the "Secretary concerned" is, there could be more clarity on whether other authorities or exceptions are involved in the process, which could impact inter-agency coordination.
Clarity on Act's Implications: The act's title section provides little substantive detail on its broader implications or how it will be practically implemented. This leaves stakeholders unsure about the long-term operational impact of the act.
Public Impact
The bill seeks to bring more transparency and accountability to the government’s process of administering right-of-way applications. For the general public, especially those who may rely on timely access to these rights (such as individuals or businesses in energy, transportation, or telecommunications sectors), having a clear timeline could standardize expectations and potentially reduce wait times. However, the lack of detail on consequences for missed deadlines may lead to continued frustrations if delays occur.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Applicants: Individuals and businesses applying for rights-of-way could benefit from clearer communication about their application status. However, without an appeals process or specified accountability for missed deadlines, they might still face uncertainties and delays in obtaining necessary permissions.
Government Agencies: For government agencies, the act could introduce more administrative oversight and pressure to adhere to deadlines, possibly requiring more efficient processing systems and additional resources to meet these mandates.
Legal and Consulting Firms: Firms specializing in land management or environmental law might see an increase in demand for services as applicants seek guidance navigating the complexities of the right-of-way application process.
Overall, while the ROWATA Act aims to enhance transparency and accountability, addressing the identified issues could improve its effectiveness and ensure it meets the needs of those it intends to serve.
Issues
The bill's timeline for notification ("Not later than 90 days") in Section 2(a) lacks clarity on the consequences if the deadline is missed, creating uncertainty for applicants who may experience delays without recourse.
The definition of 'right-of-way' in Section 2(b) references specific sections of U.S. law but does not provide a broader context, which might hinder the understanding of stakeholders not familiar with these legal references.
In Section 2, the bill does not outline any procedures for appeals or objections to decisions made by the Secretary concerned about the completeness of an application, potentially limiting due process for applicants.
The term 'Secretary concerned' in Section 2(b) is defined, but there could be more clarity regarding whether there are exceptions or additional authorities involved in decision-making, which might impact inter-agency coordination.
Section 1, which titles the act as the 'Right-Of-Way Application Transparency and Accountability Act', provides little substantive detail, leaving the implications and operational aspects of the act unclear for stakeholders.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that the official name of the legislation is the "Right-Of-Way Application Transparency and Accountability Act," which can be shortened to "ROWATA Act."
2. Determination regarding rights-of-way Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the process for handling applications for rights-of-way on public and National Forest System lands. It defines the term "right-of-way" and identifies the "Secretary concerned" as either the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture, depending on the land type involved.