Overview

Title

An Act To impose restrictions on correspondent and payable-through accounts in the United States with respect to Chinese financial institutions that conduct transactions involving the purchase of petroleum or petroleum products from Iran.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 5923 is a rule from the U.S. House of Representatives that wants to stop money connections with Chinese banks if they buy oil from Iran. This rule checks each year if these banks are doing this, and then tells Congress.

Summary AI

H. R. 5923 seeks to impose restrictions on certain financial accounts in the United States, specifically targeting Chinese financial institutions that engage in transactions involving petroleum or petroleum products purchased from Iran. The bill amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 to define "significant financial transactions" that would trigger these sanctions. It mandates a yearly review by the President, over a period of five years, to ascertain and report any such transactions to relevant Congressional committees. The bill has been passed by the House of Representatives as of April 15, 2024.

Published

2024-04-15
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2024-04-15
Package ID: BILLS-118hr5923eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
489
Pages:
6
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 144
Verbs: 23
Adjectives: 34
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 22
Entities: 39

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.37
Average Sentence Length:
37.62
Token Entropy:
4.66
Readability (ARI):
21.15

AnalysisAI

The bill under consideration, H.R. 5923, is titled the "Iran-China Energy Sanctions Act of 2023." Its primary objective is to impose restrictions on certain financial activities related to the purchase of petroleum and petroleum products from Iran by Chinese financial institutions, as well as transactions involving unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The core provision necessitates an annual presidential determination to assess whether significant financial transactions have occurred, compelling the President to report these findings to congressional committees.

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 5923 aims to expand existing U.S. sanctions by targeting Chinese financial institutions if they engage in significant transactions related to Iranian petroleum. The legislation also extends to transactions involving Iranian UAVs or related components, broadening the scope of the sanctions framework. This move aligns with ongoing efforts to curtail Iran's economic resources and interfere with its ability to fund activities that the U.S. government deems detrimental to regional and international stability.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues arise from the bill's provisions. The term "significant financial transaction" remains undefined in terms of specific thresholds, which could lead to varying interpretations and enforcement challenges. This ambiguity can result in inconsistent sanction applications, posing risks for businesses navigating international trade regulations. Moreover, the bill requires annual determinations on foreign financial transactions but lacks precise guidelines on how these assessments should be conducted. This absence of direction could lead to subjectivity and inconsistencies in the enforcement of sanctions.

Another critical concern is the lack of clarity regarding the consequences or actions to be pursued once a financial institution is found to have engaged in significant transactions. This missing information raises questions about the transparency and effectiveness of the bill in addressing its intended goals.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill could impact international trade dynamics and economic relations between the United States and China, with potential ramifications for global markets. Should the sanctions effectively deter Chinese financial institutions from engaging with Iran, the economic impact could be substantial for both Iran and the concerned Chinese entities. Additionally, individuals and businesses involved in related sectors may face uncertainties around compliance and enforcement, which could translate to heightened caution and reevaluation of international partnerships.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as Chinese financial institutions and firms engaged in the petroleum and UAV industries, could experience direct impacts. Companies might need to re-evaluate their supply chains and financial relationships to mitigate risk exposure. Conversely, for U.S. policymakers and industries aligned with U.S. foreign policy objectives, the bill represents a strategic tool that aligns with broader geopolitical aims. Such stakeholders may view the bill as a positive step towards managing Iran's global influence and reducing its access to financial resources.

In conclusion, while the bill demonstrates a continued commitment to applying economic pressure on Iran, the ambiguity in its definitions and consequences presents challenges that could affect its overall efficacy and fairness. It remains essential for further clarifications to be made to ensure that the bill's implementation does not inadvertently lead to unfair sanctions or economic disruptions.

Issues

  • The definition of a 'significant financial transaction' as described in Section 2 is ambiguous. It includes any transaction by a Chinese financial institution involving the purchase of petroleum from Iran, regardless of size, frequency, or nature. This could lead to inconsistent application and challenges in enforcement, impacting both U.S. foreign policy and international business practices.

  • Section 2 requires an annual determination by the President on foreign financial institutions' involvement in significant transactions related to Iranian petroleum and UAVs. However, there is no clear guideline or process outlined for how these determinations should be made, which could result in subjective assessments and potentially unfair sanctions enforcement.

  • The bill amends Section 1245(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 but does not specify the consequences or specific actions to be taken if financial institutions are identified as conducting significant transactions. This lack of specificity may lead to varying degrees of enforcement and accountability, raising concerns about transparency and consistency in U.S. sanctions policy.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the short title of the Act as the “Iran-China Energy Sanctions Act of 2023,” which means this is how the Act will be officially referred to.

2. Sanctions on foreign financial institutions with respect to the purchase of petroleum products and unmanned aerial vehicles from Iran Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the National Defense Authorization Act to include sanctions on Chinese and other foreign financial institutions that engage in transactions involving the purchase of petroleum products and unmanned aerial vehicles from Iran. It requires the President to evaluate and report these transactions annually to certain Senate and House committees for five years.