Overview

Title

An Act To reauthorize certain United States Geological Survey water data enhancement programs.

ELI5 AI

The WATER Data Improvement Act wants to make water data programs run by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) better by focusing on streams and adding tools like rain sensors, with $4,000,000 set aside each year to help pay for this. Plus, it wants to work more with Native American Tribes to make water projects better on their lands too.

Summary AI

H.R. 5770, known as the “Water Monitoring and Tracking Essential Resources (WATER) Data Improvement Act,” proposes updates to the water data programs managed by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). It seeks to change the existing "national streamflow information program" name to the "Federal priority streamgage program" and introduces technical updates, including adding precipitation sensors to water-quality monitoring. The bill also outlines funding of $4,000,000 per fiscal year for the program from 2023 to 2028 and emphasizes collaboration with Tribes and their lands for water data enhancement projects.

Published

2024-07-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-07-09
Package ID: BILLS-118hr5770rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
708
Pages:
5
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 185
Verbs: 48
Adjectives: 13
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 43
Entities: 40

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.56
Average Sentence Length:
101.14
Token Entropy:
4.36
Readability (ARI):
48.49

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, officially titled the “Water Monitoring and Tracking Essential Resources (WATER) Data Improvement Act,” aims to reauthorize and update the United States Geological Survey's water data enhancement initiatives. This act seeks to amend Section 9507 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009. It involves renaming the national streamflow information program to the Federal priority streamgage program. The amendments target improvements in water resource data collection and propose extending the funding allocation from 2023 through 2028 while emphasizing collaboration with both State and Tribal governments.

Significant Issues

A notable issue with the bill is the lack of clarity surrounding the budget amount specified in Section 2(b)(7). The allocation of $4,000,000 per fiscal year is mentioned without accompanying justification, potentially raising concerns about whether this is an appropriate or necessary amount. This could lead to speculation about inefficient spending.

Further complications arise from the bill’s expanded inclusion of "Tribes" and "Tribal lands." This is considered a positive step towards inclusivity; however, without sufficient detail, there could be challenges in ensuring equitable application across various regions. Different regions might have distinct needs and capacities for implementing these provisions, and the bill does not provide guidance on addressing such disparities.

Additionally, the removal of subsection (c) raises questions since it is omitted without explanation. Stakeholders may be confused or unaware of the specific provisions or programs being eliminated and how this might affect them.

Lastly, Section 2(a)(1)(D)(ii) implies changes in how feedback is solicited for Federal needs but lacks clear instructions. This gap can lead to ambiguous implementation of the newly named Federal priority streamgage program, potentially affecting the program’s efficacy.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the bill could have a beneficial impact on public access to water resource information through improved data collection. Enhanced accuracy and availability of water data are crucial for environmental monitoring, flood management, and water resource planning. However, the general public may experience skepticism about financial expenditure due to the unspecified rationale behind the budget allocation.

For specific stakeholders, such as State and Tribal governments, the bill offers pathways to greater participation and collaboration in water resource management. The explicit inclusion of Tribal governments signifies a step toward recognizing and integrating indigenous knowledge and priorities. Nevertheless, the lack of detailed guidance could lead to inconsistent practices, complicating implementation efforts on the ground.

The ambiguity in certain sections might hinder effective implementation, causing confusion about which elements of the previous legislation are being retained or discarded. This could particularly affect agencies responsible for water monitoring and those relying on Federal streamgage data for decision-making.

In summary, while the bill presents promising prospects for enhancing water data programs, addressing the identified issues could ensure more effective utilization of resources and clearer benefits for all parties involved.

Financial Assessment

The Water Monitoring and Tracking Essential Resources (WATER) Data Improvement Act, introduced as H.R. 5770, aims to enhance water data collection efforts managed by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). A key financial aspect of the bill is the allocation of $4,000,000 per fiscal year for the Federal priority streamgage program from 2023 to 2028.

Financial Allocations

The bill establishes a specific amount of $4,000,000 per fiscal year for funding water data enhancement initiatives. This funding is intended to support the transition from the previous national streamflow information program to the newly designated Federal priority streamgage program. The allocation covers the period from 2023 through 2028, marking a commitment to long-term investment in water monitoring infrastructure and technology.

Addressing the Issues

Lack of Justification for the $4,000,000 Allocation

One of the highlighted issues is the absence of a clear rationale for the $4,000,000 per fiscal year figure. The legislation does not provide details or a breakdown justifying this specific funding amount. This lack of explanation may raise concerns about whether the allocated funds align with actual program needs or if they could potentially lead to inefficient or wasteful spending. Stakeholders may find it difficult to assess the appropriateness of the budget without a transparent basis for the allocation.

Expansion to Include Tribes and Tribal Lands

The amendments in the bill expand the involvement of Tribes and Tribal lands in water data enhancement projects. However, the financial allocations do not specify how these groups will benefit from the $4,000,000 funding. The bill introduces broader inclusion but lacks detailed guidance on how funds will specifically support Tribal water resource agencies, which might require additional clarification to ensure equitable distribution and effective collaboration.

By proposing these financial commitments, the bill seeks to improve water data accuracy and integration across different regions. However, providing more comprehensive details on how the funding will be utilized could mitigate concerns and enhance confidence in the program’s ability to meet its objectives efficiently.

Issues

  • The budgetary provision of '$4,000,000 per fiscal year' in Section 2(b)(7) is included without clear justification, which could lead to concerns about the necessity of this specific amount and potential wasteful spending.

  • The amendments in Section 2(b) expand the inclusion of 'Tribes' and 'Tribal lands' without sufficient detail, which may require additional clarification to ensure fair and consistent application across different regions.

  • The removal of subsection (c) in Section 2 without explanation could cause confusion about which provisions or programs are being eliminated, potentially impacting stakeholders that are reliant on that subsection.

  • The text lacks sufficient clarity about how feedback is solicited for Federal needs as amended in Section 2(a)(1)(D)(ii), which could result in ambiguous implementation of the 'Federal priority streamgage program.'

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the official short title of the legislation, which is "Water Monitoring and Tracking Essential Resources (WATER) Data Improvement Act."

2. Water data enhancement by United States Geological Survey Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendments to Section 9507 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 update various elements of the legislation, such as renaming the national streamflow information program to the Federal priority streamgage program and extending funding from 2023 through 2028 while ensuring collaboration with States and Tribes.

Money References

  • Section 9507 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (42 U.S.C. 10367) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking the heading and inserting “Federal priority streamgage program”; (B) in paragraph (1), by striking “national streamflow information program, as reviewed by the National Research Council in 2004” and inserting “Federal priority streamgage program”; (C) in paragraph (2), by striking “national streamflow information program” each place it appears and inserting “Federal priority streamgage program”; (D) in paragraph (4)— (i) in subparagraph (A)— (I) by striking “2009” and inserting “2023”; and (II) in clause (ii), by inserting “precipitation” before “water-quality sensors”; and (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking “National Streamflow Information Program as reviewed by the National Research Council.” and inserting “Federal needs established through regular solicitation of feedback, such as that documented in the report titled ‘Re-prioritization of the U.S. Geological Survey Federal Priority streamgage program, 2022’ (Open-file Report 2023-1032).”; (E) in paragraph (5), by striking “national streamgaging network” each place it appears and inserting “Federal priority streamgage network”; and (F) in paragraph (6)— (i) in subparagraph (A)— (I) by striking “national streamflow information program” and inserting “Federal priority streamgage program”; and (II) by striking “2023” and inserting “2028”; and (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking “2019” and inserting “2028”; (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (2)— (i) in subparagraph (B), by inserting “and Tribes” after “agencies” and (ii) in subparagraph (C)— (I) by inserting “or Tribal lands” after “within a State”; and (II) by inserting “or Tribe” after “water resource agency”; (B) in paragraph (6), by inserting “, a Tribe” after “a State”; and (C) in paragraph (7)— (i) by striking “such sums as are necessary” and inserting “$4,000,000 per fiscal year”; and (ii) by striking “2009 through 2023” and inserting “2023 through 2028”; (3) by striking subsection (c); (4) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c); and (5) in subsection (c)(4) (as so redesignated by this subsection), by striking “2019” and inserting “2028”. ---