Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently allow a tax deduction at the time an investment in qualified property is made, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
Congress wants to change the rules so that people and businesses can save money on taxes faster when they buy special things like machines or buildings for work. This new rule would let them get a tax break right away instead of waiting, starting from things they bought after September 27, 2017.
Summary AI
H.R. 574 proposes changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that would allow individuals and businesses to claim a tax deduction immediately when they invest in qualified property. Known as the “Accelerate Long-term Investment Growth Now Act” or the “ALIGN Act,” the bill aims to make this tax benefit permanent by updating the rules governing the depreciation of property. The bill includes technical changes to the tax code to support this policy, which applies to property placed in service after September 27, 2017.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The bill, titled the "Accelerate Long-term Investment Growth Now Act" or "ALIGN Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Its primary goal is to establish a permanent rule allowing businesses to fully deduct, or "expense," the cost of qualified property investments at the time they are made. This adjustment would apply retroactively to any property placed in service after September 27, 2017. The proposed change aims to incentivize investments by allowing businesses to immediately benefit from tax deductions, which could ultimately promote economic growth.
Significant Issues
One notable issue with the bill is the ambiguity surrounding the "applicable percentage" set at 100% for qualified property investment. While the bill does assert that the percentage is 100% for property placed in service after a specified date, it does not clarify if there are any exceptions or varied conditions that could modify this percentage.
Additionally, the language of the bill is complex and technical, making it potentially difficult for individuals without specialized legal or tax backgrounds to understand. This complexity can hinder transparency and the accessibility of the law to business owners and the general public.
Another concern is the absence of any analysis regarding the fiscal impact of this permanent full expensing policy. Without an assessment of potential costs or budgetary implications, there is a risk of unintended budgetary stress on public finances.
There are also concerns about how the amendments would interact with existing sections of the Internal Revenue Code and Public Law 115-97. The lack of clarity in aligning these changes with current laws could lead to inconsistencies and potential legal challenges.
Lastly, the bill does not present a clear rationale for the specific amendments, such as the removal or redesignation of certain clauses, which might lead to confusion regarding the legislative intent.
Impact on the Public
If enacted, the ALIGN Act could broadly incentivize businesses to increase their investments in qualified property, potentially spurring economic growth and modernizing infrastructure. The capacity for businesses to immediately expense their investments might encourage further investments, reduction in capital costs, and ultimately lead to the creation of more jobs.
However, without clarity around potential exceptions or detailed fiscal impact assessments, there is a possibility of broader economic concerns. The change could result in short-term reductions in tax revenue, which might necessitate adjustments in public spending or lead to funding gaps in government programs.
Impact on Stakeholders
Businesses: The bill primarily aims to benefit businesses by providing an immediate tax deduction, enhancing their cash flow and investment capacity. Small businesses, in particular, might find this change beneficial as it could reduce immediate tax liabilities and provide funds for expansion or improvement.
Government and Policy Makers: For policymakers, while the goal is to stimulate investment, there is a potential challenge in balancing the reduced tax revenue with existing spending commitments. Policymakers would need to consider adjustments in other areas to maintain fiscal responsibility.
Tax Professionals and Legal Experts: The complexity of the amendments might lead to increased demand for tax professionals and legal experts to help businesses navigate the new provisions effectively. This increase in demand could be beneficial for these professionals but might also add to business costs.
Overall, while the ALIGN Act could drive economic growth by fostering a more investment-friendly environment, careful consideration of its implementation, transparency in communication, and evaluation of fiscal impacts are crucial to addressing the identified issues effectively.
Issues
The undefined scope of 'applicable percentage' being 100% for property placed in service after September 27, 2017, without mention of exceptions could lead to ambiguity in its application. This issue is noted in Section 2(a).
The complexity of the language used in the amendments may render the bill difficult to understand for those without a specialized background in tax law, raising concerns about accessibility and transparency of the law. This is highlighted in Section 2.
There is no mention of the fiscal impact or cost analysis of implementing the amendments, which could cause significant budgetary concerns. This absence of financial consideration could impact public finance management. This issue is noted across the amendments in Section 2.
The potential inconsistency or conflict with other sections of the Internal Revenue Code or parts of Public Law 115-97, due to lack of clarity on how the changes interact with existing law, may lead to legal challenges or implementation issues. This issue is highlighted in Section 2.
The absence of a clear explanation or rationale for the amendment changes, specifically the removal or redesignation of subclauses and clauses, can create confusion and lack of transparency in legislative intent. This is a concern arising in Section 2(b).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section specifies the name of the Act, which can be referred to as the "Accelerate Long-term Investment Growth Now Act" or simply the "ALIGN Act".
2. Permanent full expensing for qualified property Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow businesses to fully expense qualified property placed in service after September 27, 2017, meaning they can immediately deduct 100% of the cost. It also includes updates to ensure consistency with these changes and states that these amendments are retroactive, applying as if they were part of a 2017 law.