Overview
Title
To require the Council on Environmental Quality to publish an annual report on environmental reviews and causes of action based on alleged non-compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 573 is a rule that asks a special group called the Council on Environmental Quality to write and share a report every year about how they check on nature when someone wants to build or change something big, like a road or building. The report also tells if anyone broke the rules, shows everyone involved, and shares how long and expensive the checking process is.
Summary AI
H.R. 573 requires the Council on Environmental Quality to annually publish a report on the environmental reviews conducted under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Starting in 2025, these reports will detail each legal action taken due to alleged non-compliance, including the involved parties and outcomes, and will summarize the length, cost, and timelines of environmental impact assessments over the past five and ten years. The information in the reports will be organized by project type and sector, and the underlying data will be made publicly available.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the “Studying NEPA’s Impact on Projects Act,” mandates that the Council on Environmental Quality publish an annual report assessing the impact of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on various projects. This includes a detailed analysis of any legal actions taken due to alleged non-compliance with NEPA, the length and cost of environmental studies, and timelines for completing federal actions. The first report is scheduled to be released in July 2025, with data to be publicly accessible and organized by different project types and sectors.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the significant issues identified in the bill is the potential for substantial administrative costs associated with producing the detailed annual reports, as mentioned in sections 2 and 201. This expenditure could be seen as wasteful if not managed efficiently. Additionally, the bill has an open-ended definition of "covered sector," potentially leading to arbitrary decisions by the Council on Environmental Quality regarding which sectors to include. The bill's effective date is set for July 2025, potentially delaying the resolution of existing issues.
The complexity of the language used in the legislation might reduce its transparency for the general public, making it challenging to understand. Moreover, the publication of underlying data, including court records, raises concerns about privacy and data protection. Finally, the requirement for detailed tracking and analysis of trends, particularly regarding environmental impact statements, could be resource-intensive without directly improving project outcomes.
Impact on the Public
The broader public could experience both positive and negative impacts from this bill. On the positive side, the required annual reports aim to increase transparency regarding the influence of NEPA on development projects, potentially leading to more informed decision-making and policy adjustments in the future. However, concerns about administrative costs and privacy could result in public scrutiny over how resources are allocated and protected under this mandate.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For environmental advocacy groups, this bill could offer a structured framework for monitoring NEPA compliance and project impacts. By making data publicly available, these groups would have better resources to advocate for environmental protections. Conversely, federal agencies and project developers could face increased scrutiny and administrative burdens, which might slow down project timelines and increase operational costs. Legal professionals may see an uptick in demand for services due to the detailed tracking of NEPA-related litigation. Meanwhile, the Council on Environmental Quality would bear the substantial responsibility of implementing and managing the reporting system, which could strain its resources.
In summary, while aiming to improve transparency and accountability concerning environmental policies, the bill also introduces concerns related to cost, privacy, and effective implementation, with varying implications for different stakeholder groups.
Issues
The requirement to publish a detailed annual report on environmental reviews and causes of action could lead to substantial administrative costs, potentially resulting in wasteful spending if not efficiently managed. This is particularly relevant in sections 2 and 201 (both labeled as 'Annual report on NEPA’s impact on projects').
The open-ended definition of 'covered sector' allows for potentially arbitrary inclusion of sectors by the Council on Environmental Quality, leading to ambiguity and lack of clear scope. This issue is found in section 201.
The timeline for beginning the reporting requirement in July 2025, as specified in section 2, could delay addressing potential issues identified in the reports, which might be seen as detracting from the bill's effectiveness.
The language used in the bill, particularly in sections 2 and 201, is complex and may be difficult for the general public to understand, reducing transparency and possibly leading to misinterpretations.
The bill mandates the publication of underlying data and court records related to causes of action, as noted in section 201(c), raising potential privacy and data protection issues, especially if sensitive information is not adequately safeguarded.
Requiring detailed data tracking and analysis of trends in environmental impact statement page counts and completion times could be resource-intensive, as indicated in sections 2 and 201. This might not directly contribute to improving project outcomes, raising concerns about inefficient use of resources.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section specifies the short title of the Act, which is “Studying NEPA’s Impact on Projects Act.”
2. Annual report on NEPA’s impact on projects Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Council on Environmental Quality to publish an annual report, starting in 2025, that details the impact of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on projects. The report must cover legal actions based on NEPA, the content and cost of environmental impact statements, project completion timelines, and include data categorized by project type and sector.
201. Annual report on NEPA’s impact on projects Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Council on Environmental Quality to publish an annual report starting in 2025 on the effects of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on various projects. The report will detail legal actions related to non-compliance, the length and costs of environmental studies, completion timelines for federal actions, and the information will be organized by project type and sector, with data made publicly available.