Overview

Title

To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify those classes of individuals born in the United States who are nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.

ELI5 AI

The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025 says that a baby born in the U.S. is a citizen if at least one parent is already a U.S. citizen, lives in the U.S. permanently, or is an immigrant serving in the military. This change will not take away citizenship from anyone who was born before the new rule starts.

Summary AI

H.R. 569, titled the “Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025," aims to clarify who is considered a citizen of the United States by birth under section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. It specifies that a person born in the U.S. is a citizen if one parent is either a U.S. citizen, a permanent resident, or a lawful immigrant serving in the military. The new definition acknowledges the birthright citizenship guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. Importantly, the changes will not affect the citizenship status of anyone born before the bill is enacted.

Published

2025-01-21
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-21
Package ID: BILLS-119hr569ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
596
Pages:
3
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 206
Verbs: 29
Adjectives: 11
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 22
Entities: 76

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.72
Average Sentence Length:
74.50
Token Entropy:
4.53
Readability (ARI):
36.52

AnalysisAI

The bill titled "Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025" aims to amend the existing section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify which individuals are considered nationals and citizens of the United States from birth. Introduced by Mr. Babin and several co-sponsors, this bill was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

General Summary

The proposed legislation seeks to redefine the parameters of birthright citizenship in the United States. Specifically, it outlines conditions under which a person born on United States soil would qualify as a U.S. citizen by birth. According to the amendment, a child born in the United States would be deemed "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. if one parent is a U.S. citizen, a lawful permanent resident, or a legal immigrant currently serving in the U.S. armed forces. The bill explicitly states that these provisions will not retroactively affect individuals born before the enactment of this law.

Summary of Significant Issues

One prominent issue with this bill is the use of the term "subject to the jurisdiction," which is drawn from the 14th Amendment. This phrase may be deemed ambiguous without adequate clarification, potentially opening the door to varied interpretations and legal challenges. The bill’s reliance on legal references and nuanced legal language, such as referencing specific sections of U.S. law, may also make it difficult for readers without a legal background to fully understand the changes and their implications.

Additionally, the bill addresses individuals performing active service in the armed forces, giving them special consideration for their children's citizenship status. However, the term "lawful status under immigration laws" concerning these individuals could introduce complexity, possibly requiring further definition to prevent misunderstanding regarding eligibility for birthright citizenship.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill proposes a significant change to the understanding of birthright citizenship in the United States. By narrowing the criteria for birthright citizenship, the bill could potentially reduce the number of individuals automatically granted U.S. citizenship based solely on birth within U.S. borders. This action may impact families of mixed immigration status residing in the U.S., particularly those where neither parent is a U.S. citizen or a lawful permanent resident.

For current and future immigrants, this change could alter the calculations families might make about living or having children in the United States. It could lead to legal, social, and possibly economic adjustments for those who would no longer be afforded automatic citizenship.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The bill could have both positive and negative implications for different stakeholders. Supporters of the amendment might argue that it strengthens the integrity of citizenship laws by ensuring stronger connections to the country through parental ties. This could be perceived as a move towards a stricter and potentially more manageable immigration system.

Conversely, the bill may negatively affect immigrants who are currently residing in the U.S. without permanent legal status. Families who find themselves ineligible for their children’s automatic citizenship may face uncertainty and additional legal challenges. Advocacy groups focused on immigrant rights might argue that this bill could limit opportunities and pathways to citizenship for individuals born in the country.

Overall, while the bill proposes a clear framework for delineating birthright citizenship, its adoption would prompt significant legal and societal discussions concerning the balance of rights, citizenship, and national policy objectives.

Issues

  • The term 'subject to the jurisdiction' in Section 2 could be seen as ambiguous and may require further clarification to avoid potential legal disputes or misinterpretations. This is important as it impacts the interpretation of who is entitled to birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment.

  • The language of the bill in Section 2 uses legal references such as 'section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act' and 'section 1 of the 14th amendment' which may not be easily understood by all readers, potentially causing confusion about its implications.

  • Section 2's definition of 'lawful status under the immigration laws' and its implications for those performing active service in the armed forces may introduce complexity and require clarification, as it affects the understanding of eligibility for birthright citizenship.

  • The applicability clause in Section 2(b) addresses the amendment's non-effect on those born before the enactment but does not clarify how it interacts with existing laws for persons born shortly before or after the enactment date, which could lead to confusion or legal challenges.

  • Section 1, titled 'Short title', is straightforward and does not present issues of concern, as it only provides the title of the act.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill designates its official name as the “Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025.”

2. Citizenship at birth for certain persons born in the United States Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the Immigration and Nationality Act is being modified to specify that a person born in the United States is considered under U.S. jurisdiction for citizenship purposes if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen, a lawful permanent resident, or a legal immigrant serving in the armed forces. This change does not affect anyone born before the law is enacted.