Overview

Title

To expand labor representation on State and local workforce development boards, to provide a definition of labor organization, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make sure more people from labor groups, like unions, are part of the teams that help with job planning and training, going from 20% to 30% of the group. It also changes what kinds of labor groups can be part of these teams, but it doesn’t explain clearly why or how it all fits together.

Summary AI

H. R. 567 aims to increase the percentage of labor representatives on State and local workforce development boards from 20% to 30%. The bill also seeks to expand the definition of "labor organization" in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to include organizations like labor union federations and those representing employees of government and certain other sectors.

Published

2025-01-20
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-20
Package ID: BILLS-119hr567ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
442
Pages:
3
Sentences:
12

Language

Nouns: 146
Verbs: 27
Adjectives: 15
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 26
Entities: 43

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.23
Average Sentence Length:
36.83
Token Entropy:
4.66
Readability (ARI):
20.10

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the “Expanding Labor Representation in the Workforce System Act,” aims to enhance the involvement of labor organizations in workforce development boards at both the state and local levels. Specifically, it proposes to amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act by increasing the required labor representation from 20% to 30% on these boards. Additionally, the bill seeks to broaden the definition of "labor organization" to include a variety of groups, such as labor union federations and bodies representing certain government and agricultural workers.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill introduces several significant issues that warrant attention. Firstly, the increase in labor representation on workforce development boards lacks a clear rationale or context, raising questions about the underlying motivation and its potential effects on funding and operational changes. Moreover, this shift might influence strategies or priorities in workforce development, possibly altering the focus in ways that need thorough evaluation.

Secondly, the definition of "labor organization" largely relies on existing legal frameworks, such as the National Labor Relations Act. This reliance may complicate the understanding and application of the bill, as it requires familiarity with prior laws. Furthermore, the bill includes specific organizations such as those representing government employees or workers under different labor laws, which could introduce perceived preference or bias, necessitating careful ethical and legal scrutiny. The exception for organizations representing agricultural workers adds another layer of complexity, potentially causing confusion without additional clarification.

Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders

Broadly, the bill aims to enhance labor representation, which could benefit workers by providing them a stronger voice in workforce-related decisions, potentially leading to more favorable labor policies. However, the general public may experience varied impacts depending on how these changes affect workforce development strategies. An increase in labor representation might lead to shifts in focus towards issues more pertinent to workers, such as job training and fair labor practices, potentially resulting in a more equitable workforce system.

For specific stakeholders, the impact of the bill could be mixed. Labor organizations and workers might view the increased representation as a positive step towards greater influence in shaping workforce policies that directly affect them. This could lead to improved working conditions and job opportunities. Conversely, employers and business groups could raise concerns about an imbalance in representation and the complexity introduced by the broadened definition of labor organizations, fearing potential increases in operational costs or regulatory complexities. Government bodies at various levels might need to adjust to this shift in representational dynamics, which could involve navigating new legal or operational challenges.

Overall, while the bill seeks to amplify labor's role in workforce development, it introduces several complexities and potential impacts that require careful consideration and discussion among lawmakers, stakeholders, and the public.

Issues

  • The amendments to both State and local workforce development boards in Sections 2 and 3 increase representation from 20 percent to 30 percent, but lack context or justification. This raises concerns about the implications for funding, operational changes, and the potential impact on workforce development strategies or priorities.

  • The definition of 'labor organization' in Section 4 relies on external legal references, which may complicate understanding for those unfamiliar with the National Labor Relations Act. This could introduce ambiguity into the interpretation of the bill and its applicability.

  • The inclusion of specific organizations such as state, municipal, and federal entities, as well as organizations representing federal employees or those subject to different labor laws, in the definition of 'labor organization' in Section 4 could be seen as introducing bias or preference, which may require legal and ethical scrutiny.

  • The exception for organizations representing agricultural workers in the definition of 'labor organization' under Section 4 creates potential confusion without adequate clarification of the scope, which could impact both labor organizations and agricultural policies.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states its official title, which is the “Expanding Labor Representation in the Workforce System Act”.

2. State workforce development boards Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act by changing the percentage requirement in Section 101(b)(1)(C)(ii) from 20% to 30%.

3. Local workforce development boards Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to increase the required percentage representation from "20" to "30" for local workforce development boards as specified in section 107(b)(2)(B).

4. Definition of labor organization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to define "labor organization" similarly to the National Labor Relations Act, while also including groups like labor union federations and organizations representing certain government and agricultural workers.