Overview

Title

An Act To amend title 39, United States Code, to require mail-in ballots to use the Postal Service barcode service, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 5658 is a new rule that says all mail-in voting envelopes must have a special barcode to keep track of them, starting in 2026, so everyone knows their vote is safe.

Summary AI

H. R. 5658, known as the “Vote by Mail Tracking Act,” proposes changes to title 39 of the United States Code to improve the tracking of mail-in ballots. The bill mandates that ballot envelopes must include a Postal Service barcode for tracking purposes, meet specific design and machinability requirements, and display the Official Election Mail Logo. These regulations aim to enhance the security and efficiency of mail-in voting and will apply to federal elections starting in 2026. The Postmaster General is required to provide necessary guidance to ensure compliance with these requirements annually.

Published

2024-11-19
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-11-19
Package ID: BILLS-118hr5658rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
506
Pages:
4
Sentences:
20

Language

Nouns: 157
Verbs: 46
Adjectives: 16
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 29
Entities: 44

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.22
Average Sentence Length:
25.30
Token Entropy:
4.84
Readability (ARI):
14.35

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, named the "Vote by Mail Tracking Act," seeks to amend title 39 of the United States Code to require all government-issued mail-in ballots to incorporate a Postal Service barcode for tracking purposes. This bill, identified as H.R. 5658, has recently been received by the Senate and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Key provisions include the requirement for these ballots to meet specific design and machineability criteria established by the Postal Service, and the mandatory inclusion of the Official Election Mail Logo. The bill explicitly states that it will not apply to Federal write-in absentee ballots, and its stipulations will take effect for federal elections beginning in 2026.

Summary of Significant Issues

A primary concern raised by the bill is the potential favoritism towards the Postal Service, as it necessitates the use of their barcoding system, potentially excluding other tracking service providers. This could invoke questions about fair competition and antitrust issues. Additionally, the broad authority granted to the Postal Service for setting design parameters and requirements without clearly defined guidelines may lead to transparency issues and concerns over fairness.

The absence of provisions addressing potential disruptions in Postal Service operations is also notable. There is no stipulation for how ballots should be managed if the required barcoding services are unavailable, which could be problematic in ensuring reliable election mail tracking. Furthermore, the bill does not clarify whether there will be financial assistance for government entities to comply with these new standards, which could lead to budgetary constraints.

The exemption of Federal write-in absentee ballots from these regulations is clear, but its rationale remains unexplained, which could cause misunderstandings among stakeholders. Lastly, the legislation’s applicability starting in 2026 raises questions about the transition plan for elections before this date.

Potential Impacts on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill could enhance the integrity and transparency of mail-in voting by enabling tracking of ballots, thus providing voters with greater confidence in the election process. However, the potential monopolization of election mail services by the Postal Service, as implied by the exclusive reliance on its barcode system, might limit competition and innovation in tracking technologies.

For voters, especially those relying on mail-in ballots, the introduction of a tracking system could offer significant peace of mind, allowing them to monitor the progress and receipt of their votes. However, any disruption in Postal Service operations or failure to manage the transition effectively could result in confusion and possibly undermine confidence in the process.

Impact on Stakeholders

Election authorities at various government levels would face new compliance responsibilities, necessitating updates to their voting infrastructure to accommodate these changes. The lack of explicit funding provisions in the bill could strain their resources, especially for smaller entities with limited budgets.

The Postal Service itself stands to gain an increased role in the election process, potentially increasing its workload and operational responsibilities. This might lead to further scrutiny of its ability to handle such tasks efficiently and without biases.

Mail vendors and third-party tracking service providers may view this legislation unfavorably, as it could restrict their involvement in electoral processes, given the emphasis on using Postal Service systems exclusively. It would be crucial for Congress to address these concerns and ensure a balance that safeguards fair market practices while improving election integrity.

Issues

  • The requirement in Section 2(a)(1) that ballot envelopes must contain a Postal Service barcode might favor the Postal Service, as it mandates the use of their services without considering other potential tracking service providers. This could raise concerns about compliance with competition and antitrust principles.

  • Section 3101 delegates regulatory authority to the Postal Service to determine ballot envelope design and requirements. This broad grant of authority without specific guidelines may lead to concerns about transparency and fairness, potentially benefiting specific vendors or service providers unfairly.

  • There is no provision in Section 2 or Section 3101 for what happens if the Postal Service is unable to provide the barcode or tracking services. This could be a significant issue if their service is disrupted, impacting election mail tracking.

  • The bill does not address funding or resources to help government entities comply with the new requirements for mail-in ballots. This omission could lead to financial difficulties for government entities, potentially impacting their ability to implement these changes (Section 2, Section 3101).

  • The exemption for the Federal write-in absentee ballot in Section 2(b) is clear, but the lack of rationale for this exemption might cause confusion among stakeholders, as it is not immediately clear why this type of ballot is treated differently.

  • The language in Section 3101 about 'successive service or marking' is not defined, creating potential ambiguity about what constitutes acceptable markings or services, which could impact consistency and compliance with the new regulation.

  • The applicability clause in Section 2(c) indicates that the amendment applies starting in 2026, but it does not address transition management for elections prior to that year, which may cause implementation challenges.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill introduces its official name as the “Vote by Mail Tracking Act.”

2. Mail-in ballots and Postal Service barcode service Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The new legislation amends U.S. postal law to require that government-issued mail-in ballots must have a barcode for tracking, meet design standards set by the Postal Service, be machine-readable, and display the Official Election Mail Logo. This requirement does not apply to Federal write-in absentee ballots, and it affects elections for federal offices starting in 2026.

3101. Trackable election mail Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that government-provided ballot envelopes for mail delivery must have a trackable Postal Service barcode, adhere to specific design and machineability criteria, and display the Official Election Mail Logo. However, these rules do not apply to certain federal absentee ballots, and the Postmaster General must share necessary compliance information annually by June 1.