Overview
Title
To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to authorize the President to provide substance use and alcohol use disorder services, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to let the President help people who have problems with drugs or alcohol during big disasters. It asks a special government group to make sure people can get the support they need and to check if this help works well.
Summary AI
H.R. 5623, titled the "Addressing Addiction After Disasters Act," seeks to amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act in order to allow the President to provide services for substance use and alcohol use disorders during disasters. The bill directs the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to revise the application process for crisis counseling assistance to include these services. Additionally, it mandates a report to Congress from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) evaluating the duration of such assistance and its compliance with the Act’s requirements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Addressing Addiction After Disasters Act" proposes amendments to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. This legislation seeks to address issues related to substance use and alcohol use disorders in the aftermath of major disasters. Introduced by Ms. Balint and Ms. Tokuda, the bill received additional sponsorship and was reported with amendments, aiming to authorize the President to extend support services for these disorders in disaster situations.
General Summary of the Bill
The primary focus of this bill is to amend existing disaster relief legislation to include assistance for substance use and alcohol use disorders. It proposes changes that allow for crisis counseling to also address these specific needs. Furthermore, the bill calls for a review and update of the application process for disaster assistance to accommodate these changes. It mandates a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of these new provisions.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the major concerns with this bill lies in its lack of specificity regarding the services and interventions for substance and alcohol use disorders. Without clear definitions or criteria, there's a risk of inconsistency or gaps in service provision. Additionally, the potential need for extra funding necessary to support these expanded services is not addressed, which might put financial strain on existing resources.
The vagueness of the term "organization providing" also raises concerns about the qualifications and capabilities of the entities tasked with providing these services. There is also a lack of accountability measures, particularly concerning the report submission timeline and the oversight of fund usage, which could result in enforcement issues.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could positively impact those affected by disasters who also suffer from substance and alcohol use disorders, ensuring they receive comprehensive care. By extending mental health assistance to include these disorders, the bill potentially enhances the well-being and recovery prospects of individuals struggling with addiction in challenging circumstances.
However, the ambiguous language and lack of detail may hinder the execution of these services, leading to inefficient resource use or uneven access to necessary support. These concerns underline the need for precise implementation guidelines to ensure the intended benefits reach those in need.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For disaster-affected individuals with substance or alcohol use disorders, the bill promises potentially life-saving support. Emergency responders and health professionals stand to gain new resources and mandates for addressing addiction in disaster zones. However, service providers may face challenges due to vague criteria and possible funding uncertainties, potentially affecting their ability to deliver quality care.
Government agencies tasked with implementing this bill will need to navigate these complexities, requiring clear inter-agency collaboration and robust oversight mechanisms. Without them, there is a risk of misallocated funds and inefficient service provision, which could undermine the bill's goals.
In conclusion, while the "Addressing Addiction After Disasters Act" aims to fill critical gaps in disaster relief efforts, addressing its current limitations regarding clarity and accountability will be crucial to its success.
Issues
The amendments in Section 2 add 'substance use, or alcohol use' to the list of issues addressed by crisis counseling assistance, but it's unclear what specific services or interventions will be provided for these areas. This lack of clarity could lead to potential overlaps or gaps in service provision.
There is no specification on how the effectiveness of including 'substance use, or alcohol use' in crisis counseling will be evaluated in Section 2, which could lead to potentially ineffective or wasteful spending.
In Section 2, the amended language specifying 'substance use, or alcohol use' might require additional funding or resources, but there is no mention of the budgetary implications or whether existing funds will cover these additional services, raising financial concerns.
The phrase 'organization providing' in Section 2 is vague and could benefit from clearer criteria or qualifications for organizations that will be eligible to provide these services, to avoid potential misuse of funds or low-quality service provision.
Section 3 lacks specification on the criteria or guidelines for how changes to the application for assistance will be reviewed and adjusted, which could lead to inconsistencies in the implementation of the new provisions.
The section does not indicate any accountability measures or consequences if the required report is not submitted to Congress within the 180-day timeframe in Section 3, which could lead to oversight issues.
There are no specific guidelines or criteria in Section 4 for evaluating whether the assistance is indeed used for 'mental health, substance use, and alcohol use problems caused or aggravated by a major disaster or its aftermath', which could lead to misuse of funds.
The phrase 'compliance of the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency' in Section 4 is vague as it does not specify how compliance will be measured or audited, presenting potential legal and accountability issues.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states its short title, which is the “Addressing Addiction After Disasters Act.”
2. Crisis counseling assistance and training Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to include crisis counseling for issues related to substance and alcohol use, in addition to mental health. It specifies that these amendments apply to organizations providing these services.
3. Report on changes to application Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), along with other officials, must evaluate and report any updates to the application process for disaster assistance. This report, considering changes due to this Act, must be submitted to Congress within 180 days of the Act's enactment.
4. GAO report to Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Comptroller General is required to review and report to Congress on the crisis counseling assistance and training program, focusing on how long individuals receive help and ensuring the program is used for mental health, substance use, and alcohol problems linked to major disasters.