Overview
Title
To impose criminal and immigration penalties for intentionally fleeing a pursuing Federal officer while operating a motor vehicle.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 5585 is a new rule that says if someone tries to run away from a police officer near the U.S. border while driving a car, they can get into big trouble like going to jail or paying a lot of money. If they are not from the U.S., they might have to leave and not be allowed to come back.
Summary AI
H.R. 5585, titled the "Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act," aims to establish penalties for individuals who intentionally flee from federal officers while driving a vehicle near the U.S. border. The bill proposes criminal consequences including imprisonment and fines, with harsher penalties if the act results in serious bodily injury or death. It also sets immigration-related penalties for non-citizens who commit such offenses, making them inadmissible, deportable, and ineligible for certain types of relief. Additionally, the Attorney General is required to issue an annual report on the enforcement of these provisions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act," aims to impose criminal and immigration penalties on individuals who evade arrest or detention by a Federal officer while operating a motor vehicle. The bill outlines specific penalties that range from fines and imprisonment for up to two years, to life imprisonment if someone is killed as a result of the offense. Additionally, the bill affects immigration status, making individuals who commit such offenses inadmissible or deportable from the United States, and ineligible for certain forms of legal relief such as asylum. The legislation also calls for an annual report by the Attorney General on the enforcement and penalties related to these offenses.
Summary of Significant Issues
One key issue with the bill is the lack of clarity around the geographic scope of "operating a motor vehicle within 100 miles of the United States border," which is ambiguous and could potentially lead to legal disputes. The penalties stipulated for offenses that involve serious injury or death are not clearly aligned with existing federal statutes, which might lead to inconsistencies in legal enforcement.
Furthermore, the bill's strict penalties for immigrants, without allowances for mitigating circumstances, could raise concerns about fairness and due process. The legal jargon used, such as terms "alien," may be confusing for the public and those impacted by the legislation. Moreover, there is no established appeal process for affected individuals, nor clear guidelines on how data for annual reports will be collected, which could impact the accountability and transparency of the reports.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, the bill could impact the public by emphasizing strict law enforcement around U.S. borders, potentially improving safety for border officers. However, there are concerns that its ambiguous language and strict penalties could lead to unfair enforcement and legal challenges. The focus on penalties related to motor vehicle operation near the border means those living in these regions may face increased scrutiny.
Impact on Stakeholders
For law enforcement agencies and officers, the bill could serve as a tool to deter dangerous behaviors that threaten their safety. Border Patrol agents might benefit from the added protection of increased penalties for offenders. However, the bill could negatively impact immigrants and non-citizens who might find themselves subject to severe penalties, potentially affecting their ability to seek legal recourse or relief. Legal practitioners might face challenges interpreting and contesting the ambiguous terms and rigorous penalties specified in the bill.
Overall, while the bill aims to enhance officer safety and border security, its vague definitions and harsh penalties might create challenges in equitable enforcement and interpretation, affecting both the general public and specific stakeholder groups.
Issues
In sections 2 and 40B, the phrase 'operating a motor vehicle within 100 miles of the United States border' is ambiguous and may lead to disputes due to unclear geographic limitations or definitions of involved borders.
Sections 3 and 208A create strict penalties for aliens related to evading arrest, potentially leading to broad application without allowances for mitigation or context, which could affect due process and fairness.
The penalties in section 2 for offenses involving serious bodily injury or death are not clearly aligned with existing federal laws, potentially causing legal inconsistencies and challenges in application.
Section 3 lacks specific exceptions for urgent or justified conditions under which individuals may evade arrest, which might cast too wide a net and be considered overly punitive.
Sections 3 and 208A heavily use legal jargon without clarifying key terms such as 'alien' and 'essential elements of a violation,' which may confuse the public and those affected by the law.
There is no clear guidance in section 4 on how data for annual reports is to be collected or verified, potentially affecting the report's accuracy and transparency.
Section 2 does not define 'serious bodily injury' and lacks procedures for assessing facts, which might result in inconsistent penalty applications.
Section 3 misses a defined appeal process for individuals facing inadmissibility, deportability, or ineligibility, raising concerns about adequate legal recourse.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states that it can be officially called the “Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act.”
2. Criminal penalties for evading arrest or detention Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces a new law making it a crime to flee in a vehicle from U.S. Border Patrol or other law enforcement officers within 100 miles of the U.S. border. If caught, a person can face up to 2 years in prison or a fine, with harsher penalties, including up to life in prison, if someone is seriously injured or killed during the offense.
40B. Evading arrest or detention while operating a motor vehicle Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A person can be charged with a crime if they drive a vehicle within 100 miles of the U.S. border and try to escape from Border Patrol or law enforcement officers working with Border Patrol. The penalties can range from up to 2 years in prison and fines to harsher sentences if someone is hurt or killed, including up to life in prison.
3. Inadmissibility, deportability, and ineligibility related to evading arrest or detention while operating a motor vehicle Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill makes it so that anyone who has been involved in evading arrest or detention while driving a car is not allowed to enter or stay in the U.S., and they cannot apply for certain types of legal relief, like asylum.
208A. Ineligibility for relief related to evading arrest or detention while operating a motor vehicle Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Any non-citizen who has been convicted of, or who admits to committing, offenses related to evading arrest or detention while driving a motor vehicle is not eligible for immigration relief, including asylum.
4. Annual report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Attorney General to submit an annual report to the Judiciary Committees of both the Senate and the House of Representatives. This report must list how many people were charged under a specific law, and provide details on the penalties that were sought and those that were actually imposed for these charges.