Overview

Title

An Act To amend section 1078 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 to increase the effectiveness of the Technology Modernization Fund, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 5527 is like a plan to fix old computer systems that help run the government, making sure they work better and stay safe from bad guys online. It also makes sure everyone uses the money wisely and checks up on what needs to be fixed until 2031.

Summary AI

H.R. 5527, titled the "Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act", aims to enhance the effectiveness of the Technology Modernization Fund by amending section 1078 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018. It outlines how funds should be used, focusing on modernizing or replacing outdated government technology systems, boosting cybersecurity, and improving services to the public. The bill also requires agencies to regularly report on high-risk legacy IT systems and includes measures for accountability when funds are used based on misleading or fraudulent project descriptions. It additionally sets a deadline for the fund's cessation, aiming to maintain its operational status until December 31, 2031.

Published

2024-05-22
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-05-22
Package ID: BILLS-118hr5527rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
3,098
Pages:
17
Sentences:
22

Language

Nouns: 812
Verbs: 242
Adjectives: 100
Adverbs: 24
Numbers: 94
Entities: 91

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.93
Average Sentence Length:
140.82
Token Entropy:
4.88
Readability (ARI):
70.62

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, known as the "Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act," aims to amend section 1078 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018. This amendment focuses on the Technology Modernization Fund, aiming to enhance its effectiveness by improving information technology systems across various government agencies. By providing specific guidelines on fund allocation, the bill seeks to modernize outdated systems, bolster cybersecurity, ensure fiscal sustainability, and establish measures for accountability.

General Summary of the Bill

The core objective of this bill is to realign and clarify the use of the Technology Modernization Fund with its original intent. It mandates the allocation of funds for upgrading or replacing legacy IT systems, enhancing cybersecurity protocols, and improving the overall efficiency and effectiveness of agency technology. The bill introduces rules on fund reimbursement and requires agencies to report on high-risk technologies, contributing to better fiscal management and transparency.

Significant Issues

A significant concern with the bill is its complexity, particularly in Section 2, where numerous cross-references make it challenging for those without technical expertise to understand fully. The lack of clear criteria for what constitutes an "incremental basis" or "metric-based development milestones" also poses a risk. This ambiguity could lead to inconsistent implementation across agencies and potential mismanagement of funds. Additionally, the bill's requirement for agencies to compile IT inventory lists could impose unnecessary administrative burdens unless the criteria for "high-risk" systems are clearly standardized.

Moreover, the ambiguity surrounding terms such as "fraudulent or misleading statements" could lead to legal disputes or uneven enforcement, potentially undermining the bill's intent to enhance accountability.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this bill represents a step towards more efficient government operations and the safeguarding of information through updated and secure technology systems. By focusing on reducing outdated systems, the government can potentially provide faster and more reliable services to citizens, aligning with modern-day technological standards.

However, the complexity of the bill and its detailed guidelines may cause delays in implementation, potentially affecting the promptness of service improvements anticipated by the public.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Government Agencies: These entities stand to benefit from modernized IT systems, which can improve operational efficiency and service delivery. However, they may face challenges due to the administrative tasks required by the bill, such as compiling IT inventory lists and managing fund repayments.

Federal IT Personnel and Contractors: Individuals and companies involved in federal IT work may see increased opportunities as the government invests in updating its technology infrastructure. However, they might also encounter bureaucratic hurdles due to the detailed processes and requirements mandated by the bill.

Government Accountability Offices and Oversight Bodies: These entities are likely to benefit from the bill's directives on transparency and reporting, enabling more efficient oversight and accountability. However, the complexity of the bill's language may require additional resources to ensure accurate monitoring and compliance.

In summary, while the "Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act" seeks to enhance government IT systems and improve cybersecurity—a crucial aspect of contemporary governance—a significant emphasis on clarity and streamlined processes will be critical to its success. The bill's complexity could pose as many challenges as it seeks to resolve, underscoring the need for clear guidelines and simplified language to facilitate effective implementation and oversight.

Issues

  • The section on 'Realigning use of funds with original congressional intent' in Section 2 contains language that is overly complex and may be difficult for non-experts to understand, particularly due to numerous cross-references within the section. This complexity might hinder clarity and transparency, affecting public trust and effective implementation.

  • There is a lack of clear criteria or guidelines in Section 2 on what constitutes 'incremental basis' and 'metric-based development milestones', potentially leading to inconsistent implementation across agencies and raising concerns about accountability and equitable use of funds.

  • Section 2 allows for transferring funds on an 'incremental basis', raising the potential for wasteful spending without specifying rigorous controls or accountability measures. This could result in financial inefficiencies and misuse of federal funds.

  • The requirement for agency Chief Information Officers to compile inventory lists in Section 2 could create significant administrative burdens without clear benefits, especially if the 'high-risk' criteria are not well-defined or standardized. This issue is critical as it concerns bureaucracy and efficient resource allocation within government operations.

  • There is ambiguity in the clause regarding 'fraudulent or misleading statements' in Section 2, particularly in how 'misleading' is defined. This ambiguity could lead to disputes or inconsistent enforcement, impacting legal accountability and fair practice.

  • The repetition and complexity of the language regarding the 'total amounts in the Fund needed to keep the Fund operational until the Fund sunsets' in Section 2 could be simplified for clarity, enhancing the financial oversight and understanding among stakeholders.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act is called the "Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act."

2. Realigning use of funds with original congressional intent Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section details amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act, focusing on guidelines for using funds to enhance government information technology systems. It outlines how funds should be allocated to improve cybersecurity, retire outdated systems, ensure projects are legitimate, and keep the funding pool sustainable while introducing accountability measures like repayment rules and reporting requirements for high-risk technology.