Overview
Title
To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to review and make certain revisions to the Standard Occupational Classification System, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 540 wants to make sure the people who answer 911 calls are officially recognized for their hard work and might give them a special title in the job lists used by the government. If this doesn't happen, the person in charge has to explain why to Congress.
Summary AI
H. R. 540, titled the "911 SAVES Act of 2025", aims to change how public safety telecommunicators are classified in the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. The bill acknowledges the critical role these professionals play in emergency responses and seeks to recognize their work accurately by potentially establishing a specific code for them under protective service occupations. If the Director of the Office of Management and Budget chooses not to create this separate code, they must provide Congress with an explanation for the decision.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
H.R. 540, titled the "Supporting Accurate Views of Emergency Services Act of 2025" or the "911 SAVES Act of 2025," seeks to address the classification of public safety telecommunicators within the Standard Occupational Classification System. Introduced by Mrs. Torres of California and Mr. Fitzpatrick, the bill mandates the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to consider revising this classification during its next update. Specifically, it proposes the creation of a unique occupational code for public safety telecommunicators, recognizing their critical role in emergency services. If the OMB Director decides against this change, they are required to report to Congress with an explanation.
Key Issues
The bill raises several concerns:
Financial Implications: There is no mention of the financial impact associated with establishing a new classification code for public safety telecommunicators. This oversight suggests potential budgetary repercussions for both federal and state governments.
Vague Language: The description of how the classification should align with related systems is not clear. This might lead to confusion during implementation regarding what alignments need to be made and with which systems.
Resource Impact: Reclassifying these roles could demand changes in resource allocation or training within emergency services agencies, which the bill does not address.
Decision-making Criteria: The bill lacks clear criteria for the OMB Director's decision-making process, leaving room for subjective interpretation without accountability mechanisms.
Descriptive Volume: While the bill thoroughly describes the role of public safety telecommunicators, it may not translate effectively into actionable legislative measures focused on the intended reclassification.
Public Impact
If enacted, this bill could enhance public awareness and appreciation for the vital role of public safety telecommunicators. Redefining their classification might contribute to more accurate job descriptions and improved conditions for these workers. Moreover, by potentially recognizing them as part of protective service occupations, telecommunicators may receive acknowledgment analogous to that of police officers or firefighters.
For the general public, this reclassification could indirectly improve emergency response services. By fostering a better understanding of the duties and stresses faced by telecommunicators, the bill might advocate for enhanced support systems, benefiting the quality of service they provide.
Stakeholder Impact
Public Safety Telecommunicators: This bill could lead to greater recognition and validation of their work. If classified under protective services, they might experience improved job status and potentially better access to resources and training programs designed for high-stress occupations.
Emergency Services Agencies: These organizations might need to adapt to the new classification by altering job descriptions, training programs, or support systems. While this could present initial challenges, it may ultimately lead to a more robust workforce.
Government Agencies: The OMB and other related bodies would face the task of implementing these classification changes. Without clear financial and procedural guidelines, this might result in administrative challenges and require careful navigation to prevent inefficiencies.
In summary, while H.R. 540 aims to address a significant issue by re-categorizing public safety telecommunicators, several underlying challenges must be resolved to ensure effective implementation and positive outcomes for all involved parties.
Issues
The financial implications of establishing a separate code for public safety telecommunicators are not detailed in Section 3. This omission could result in unanticipated costs, impacting federal and state budgets if not addressed beforehand.
The language in Section 2 regarding the Standard Occupational Classification system and its alignment with related classification systems is vague, which may result in implementation challenges or confusion over the necessary changes.
The bill in Section 2 does not provide a detailed explanation of the resource impact of reclassifying public safety telecommunicators, which may affect stakeholders such as emergency services agencies, requiring them to adjust resources or training.
Section 3 lacks criteria or guidelines for the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to use when deciding whether or not to establish the new code, leaving the decision up to subjective interpretation without accountability measures.
Section 2 extensively describes the role and impact of public safety telecommunicators, but this language may be deemed too complex or lengthy without detailing specific legislative actions that would support the reclassification, potentially leading to misinterpretation of the bill's intentions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The act may be referred to as the "Supporting Accurate Views of Emergency Services Act of 2025" or simply the "911 SAVES Act of 2025".
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress highlights the crucial role of public safety telecommunicators in emergency response and notes the physical and emotional challenges they face. It suggests these professionals should be classified as Protective Service Occupations to better reflect their vital lifesaving work and align with employment classification systems.
3. Revision of Standard Occupational Classification system Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to consider creating a unique code for public safety telecommunicators in the next revision of the Standard Occupational Classification system. If the Director decides not to create this code, they must report to Congress within 60 days, explaining their decision.