Overview
Title
To authorize certain States to take certain actions on certain Federal land to secure an international border of the United States, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The CONTAINER Act lets some U.S. states put up temporary walls or barriers on federal land near the borders with Canada and Mexico to help keep the borders secure. They have to tell the government 45 days before setting them up, and they can stay for a year or longer if needed.
Summary AI
H. R. 534, also known as the “Creating Obstructions Necessary To Address Illegal and Nefarious Entry Rapidly Act” or the “CONTAINER Act,” is a bill that authorizes certain U.S. states to place temporary, movable structures on federal lands near the international borders with Canada and Mexico to enhance border security. Under this bill, these states do not need special permission from federal authorities to place these structures, provided they give a 45-day notice before doing so. Such structures can initially remain for up to one year, with possible 90-day extensions if the Secretary concerned and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner agree that full control over border operations has not yet been achieved.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Creating Obstructions Necessary To Address Illegal and Nefarious Entry Rapidly Act" or "CONTAINER Act," aims to empower states bordering Canada and Mexico to install temporary structures on certain federal lands to secure international borders. The bill, introduced in the House of Representatives on January 16, 2025, seeks to streamline the process for border states to address border security issues without requiring special permits from federal authorities, provided they notify relevant officials 45 days in advance.
Key Provisions
- Temporary Structures: The bill allows for the placement of movable, temporary structures on federal land managed by various agencies like the Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service, located near the U.S.-Canada or U.S.-Mexico borders.
- Notification Requirement: States must submit a notice to the Secretary concerned 45 days before placement, but no special authorization is needed.
- Time Limit and Extensions: Structures can initially be placed for up to one year, with possible 90-day extensions upon approval after consultation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Significant Issues
Environmental and Cultural Concerns
One major issue is the potential environmental and cultural impact of placing temporary structures on federal lands, some of which might be historically or ecologically significant. The bill does not address how these structures might affect lands managed by agencies like the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the National Park Service. This oversight could lead to significant adverse consequences unless appropriate measures are taken.
Lack of Clarity and Detail
The bill includes various terms and processes that are not fully detailed or well-defined:
- Definitional Ambiguities: The term "operational control" requires cross-referencing with the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which might necessitate additional effort to understand the context fully.
- Extension Processes: The bill lacks specifics about the number of extension terms allowed, potentially allowing indefinite placement of "temporary" structures.
- Decision-Making Criteria: The criteria for consultation and approval between relevant federal authorities are vague, leading to the possibility of inconsistent application.
Procedural Clarity
The timeline for the notification process is articulated in a potentially confusing manner, posing challenges to ensure compliance. Similarly, the roles of various officials responsible for implementing the provisions could be more straightforward.
Broad Public Impact
The bill could have various implications for the public:
- Security: It aims to enhance border security by giving border states more autonomy. Enhanced security might appeal to citizens concerned about unauthorized immigration or smuggling.
- Environmental Protection: Without explicit protective measures for the land, the legislation could lead to environmental degradation, raising concerns among conservationists and eco-conscious citizens.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Border States: The bill grants these states increased authority and flexibility in managing border security, potentially leading to faster and more localized responses to border issues.
Federal Agencies: Organizations like the Bureau of Indian Affairs may experience operational impacts, given that they weren't included in discussions regarding environmental or cultural implications.
Indigenous Communities: Lands managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs might see unintended consequences from the deployment of temporary structures, affecting cultural sites or ecosystems vital to these communities.
In conclusion, while the CONTAINER Act seeks to address border security by allowing for temporary structures on federal lands, its lack of detail on crucial aspects, especially concerning environmental and cultural impacts, may lead to broader implications that could affect various stakeholders. Careful consideration and revision could ensure that both security needs and preservation objectives are balanced effectively.
Issues
The bill does not address potential environmental or cultural impacts of placing temporary structures on Federal land, particularly with lands managed by agencies like the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the National Park Service. This could lead to significant environmental or cultural issues, especially on lands of historical or ecological significance. [Section 2]
The process for extending the temporary placement of structures is not fully detailed, particularly regarding how many extensions are allowed. This lack of detail could lead to indefinite extensions of what are supposed to be temporary structures. [Section 2]
The definition of 'operational control' requires reference to the Secure Fence Act of 2006. This external reference may create ambiguity since it requires additional resources for complete understanding. [Section 2]
The language regarding the management roles of specific officials (e.g., Directors, Chief) is complex and might be simplified for better clarity. This complexity can lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations about who is responsible for implementing and overseeing the provisions of the bill. [Section 2]
The consultation requirement between the Secretary concerned and the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection lacks detailed criteria on how decisions should be made. This could result in inconsistent or arbitrary decisions regarding the placement and extension of the temporary structures. [Section 2]
The phrase 'if the Border State submits to the Secretary concerned notice of the proposed placement not later than 45 days before the date of the proposed placement' in Section 2 could be rephrased for clarity regarding the timeline of the notification process. Unclear timelines might result in administrative inefficiencies or legal challenges regarding compliance. [Section 2]
It is unclear which criteria or processes a Border State should follow to prove a need for the temporary structures, leaving room for subjective interpretation. This ambiguity could result in unfair advantages or abuse of the provision, depending on different interpretations by different entities. [Section 2]
The title of the act, "Creating Obstructions Necessary To Address Illegal and Nefarious Entry Rapidly Act" or "CONTAINER Act," lacks context about the specific measures or scope addressed by the legislation, which could lead to ambiguity and misunderstanding among the public about its intentions and implications. [Section 1]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The opening section of this bill gives it the official name: "Creating Obstructions Necessary To Address Illegal and Nefarious Entry Rapidly Act" or simply the "CONTAINER Act".
2. Placement of movable, temporary structures on certain Federal land to secure an international border of the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows states bordering Canada or Mexico to place temporary structures on certain federal lands to secure the borders without needing special permission, as long as they notify the relevant federal official 45 days in advance. These structures can remain for up to a year, with potential 90-day extensions if border control hasn't been achieved and is approved by federal authorities.