Overview
Title
An Act To amend title 31, United States Code, to require agencies to include a list of outdated or duplicative reporting requirements in annual budget justifications, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
Imagine your school has a big book of rules that they check every year, and some rules are very old or say the same thing as other rules. H. R. 5301 wants each school (or agency) to make a list of these outdated or repeated rules so they can decide which ones can be changed or removed, making it easier for everyone to follow the important ones.
Summary AI
H. R. 5301, titled the "Eliminate Useless Reports Act of 2024," amends title 31 of the United States Code to reduce unnecessary or duplicative agency reporting requirements. The bill mandates that each agency reviews and lists its recurring reports, identifying those that are outdated or overlapping, and recommends whether to terminate or adjust the frequency or format of such submissions. Agencies must also consult with other entities involved in submissions to agree on outdated or duplicative reports, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will provide guidance to ensure consistency in these efforts. This legislation aims to streamline reporting processes to improve efficiency within federal agencies.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Eliminate Useless Reports Act of 2024" is designed to increase efficiency within U.S. federal agencies by identifying and potentially eliminating outdated or duplicative reporting requirements. Under this proposed legislation, each government agency is required to review its recurring plans and reports, and determine which may no longer be necessary. Agencies will include these assessments in their annual budget justifications. Additionally, they will consult with any other agencies involved in shared reporting responsibilities. Any identified redundancies or outdated reports will be documented, alongside recommendations for modification or elimination. The aim is to streamline government operations and reduce unnecessary bureaucratic workloads while ensuring continued transparency through readily available online publications.
Summary of Significant Issues
Subjective Criteria: One notable issue with the bill is the indeterminate nature of what constitutes an "outdated" or "duplicative" report. This lack of clear criteria could result in inconsistent interpretations between agencies, making it challenging to achieve the bill's objectives of streamlining reporting requirements effectively.
Agency Coordination: The proposed law mandates inter-agency consultation, which could lead to disagreements regarding the status of certain reports. In the absence of a definitive dispute resolution process, such disagreements could hinder the Act’s implementation, resulting in inefficient operations.
Oversight and Transparency Risks: By reducing the number of required reports, there's a potential risk of minimizing vital oversight and accountability functions. These reports often play crucial roles in the transparency of governmental operations, suggesting a need for caution in their elimination.
Administrative Burden: Requirements for additional documentation and compliance with guidance could impose new administrative burdens on agencies. Without clear evidence that these additional tasks will lead to greater efficiency, agencies may struggle to balance new reporting duties with ongoing commitments.
Impact on the General Public
For the general public, the bill could lead to more efficient use of taxpayer dollars by potentially reducing government spending on unnecessary bureaucratic processes. If successfully implemented, the Act might facilitate more effective allocation of resources within federal agencies, potentially improving overall public service delivery. However, any reduction in transparency due to fewer reports could make it harder for the public to monitor government activities and hold it accountable, thus impacting trust in public institutions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Government Agencies: The bill places an administrative onus on agencies to comply with new reporting standards and consultation requirements. While there is a promise of reduced workload in the long term, the initial phases could involve significant resource allocation for audits and adjustments to reporting practices.
Congressional Oversight Committees: For these committees, the elimination or modification of reports could mean less frequent updates from agencies and, potentially, information gaps that may affect oversight effectiveness. It could lead to streamlined information, but the quantitative reduction in reports will necessitate ensuring that essential information continues to be communicated.
Advocacy and Watchdog Groups: These groups often rely on government reports to assess and critique government performance and transparency. Removing certain reporting requirements might hinder their ability to acquire full insight into federal operations, making it more difficult to provide informed advocacy.
In conclusion, while the intent of the "Eliminate Useless Reports Act of 2024" is to enhance government efficiency, careful implementation is necessary to ensure it does not inadvertently compromise transparency and accountability. The potential benefits in reduced workloads and operational efficiencies must be balanced against the risks of diminished oversight and increased administrative requirements.
Issues
Section 2: The definitions of 'outdated or duplicative' reports are subjective and lack specific criteria, potentially leading to inconsistent implementations and interpretations across different agencies.
Section 2: The processes for agency consultation and cooperation in identifying outdated or duplicative reports could lead to unresolved disagreements, reducing the efficiency of implementing the Act's goals.
Section 2: By labeling certain reports as duplicative or outdated, there is a potential risk that important oversight and accountability functions could be diminished, which might impact government transparency.
Section 2: The requirement to submit recommendations and justifications to the Director of the Government Publishing Office and conform to guidance might increase administrative burdens on agencies without ensuring actual improvements in efficiency.
Section 2: The timelines outlined for report submissions (30 to 60 days) and for updated guidance from the Office of Management and Budget (180 days) are arbitrary and could misalign with actual legislative priorities, impacting the Act's effectiveness.
Section 1: The Act's title, 'Eliminate Useless Reports Act of 2024,' might not effectively communicate its full scope and intent, which could lead to public misunderstanding or misperceptions about its objectives.
Section 1: The minimal language and lack of detail do not clarify which reports fall under the criteria of being 'useless,' leading to potential ambiguity and ineffective implementation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act establishes its official name: the "Eliminate Useless Reports Act of 2024".
2. Sunsets for agency reports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill amends existing U.S. law to streamline how government agencies report to Congress by identifying and recommending changes to outdated or duplicated reports. Agencies must include these recommendations in their budget justifications and collaborate with other agencies if necessary, ensuring transparency through online publications, while not exempting them from any current reporting obligations.