Overview
Title
An Act To amend the Small Business Act to require a report on the performance of the Office of Rural Affairs, to require a report on the memorandum of understanding between the Small Business Administration and the Department of Agriculture entered into on April 4, 2018, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 5265 is a law that asks two offices, one that helps small businesses in the countryside and another that works with farms, to tell everyone how they are working together and what they have done to help people, but they have to do all this with the money they already have.
Summary AI
H. R. 5265 is a bill that seeks to change the Small Business Act to require reports on the activities of the Office of Rural Affairs and the collaboration between the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Department of Agriculture. The bill mandates an initial and annual performance report on the Office of Rural Affairs' efforts in providing financial assistance, organizing outreach events, and engaging in partnerships. It also requires a report on a previous agreement, known as an MOU, with the Department of Agriculture, detailing the working groups and staff involved, as well as their findings. The bill specifies that no extra funding will be allocated to implement these changes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Small Business Administration Rural Performance Report Act" aims to enhance transparency and accountability within federal efforts to support rural businesses. The bill stipulates that the Office of Rural Affairs, an entity under the Small Business Administration (SBA), must produce annual reports detailing their activities and partnerships. Additionally, it mandates a report on a 2018 memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the SBA and the Department of Agriculture. The Act does not allocate new funds, adhering to the CUTGO rule, which requires budget changes to be offset by spending cuts elsewhere.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several potential issues arise from the bill's current language and structure. One concern is that Section 2 requires the Office of Rural Affairs to produce reports including "annual statistics" and findings from the MOU, yet it does not clearly elaborate on what those statistics entail or the content of the MOU's findings. This lack of detail may lead to confusion or ineffective reporting.
Moreover, the mention of partnerships with organizations like the National Travel and Tourism Office could potentially introduce biases. Without robust oversight and criteria, there's a risk these partnerships may favor certain interest groups over others.
Another issue is the potential funding constraint. Section 4 specifies that no additional funds will be appropriated to enact the plans, which might limit the ability of the SBA to address any unforeseen challenges or expenses that arise from this Act.
Impact on the Public
The bill's requirements for extensive reporting aim to offer more transparency and insight into federal support for rural businesses. This transparency could help the general public better understand and trust government initiatives. However, the lack of appropriated funds could hinder the effectiveness of these initiatives, as there may be insufficient resources to fully implement and support them.
Impact on Stakeholders
Rural Small Businesses: The intended audience of this legislation—the rural small businesses—stands to benefit from increased support and resources through heightened accountability of the Office of Rural Affairs. By gaining deeper insights into the federal support plans, these businesses can strategically align themselves with available programs and resources.
Government Officials and Administrative Bodies: Agencies managing the Office of Rural Affairs and related entities at the SBA might face increased administrative burdens due to the reporting requirements. Effective compliance would necessitate careful resource allocation and process adjustments without additional funding, potentially stretching existing resources thin.
Collaborators and Partners: Entities that could form associations with the SBA, such as the National Travel and Tourism Office, would need to engage with clear ethical guidelines to mitigate perceptions of favoritism. Maintaining integrity and impartiality in these collaborations will be critical.
Conclusion
Overall, while the "Small Business Administration Rural Performance Report Act" seeks to bring about positive transformations by promoting transparency and collaboration between government entities, key ambiguities and potential funding issues need addressing. By refining these aspects, the bill could better serve its goal of bolstering support for rural businesses while maintaining accountability and fairness across its implementations.
Issues
The bill's Section 4 states that no additional amounts are authorized to be appropriated, potentially limiting the ability to respond to unforeseen needs or additional expenses related to the Act's implementation, which might raise concerns about the sufficiency of existing funds to achieve the Act's goals.
In Section 2, the lack of clarity around the 'annual statistics compiled pursuant to subsection (c)(2)' might lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations, impacting the effectiveness and transparency of the reports required by the bill.
The partnerships mentioned in Section 2 of the bill, especially with entities like the National Travel and Tourism Office, could introduce potential biases or favoritism unless properly regulated, raising ethical concerns.
Section 3 definition of 'MOU' does not provide specific details on its contents or implications, leading to potential misunderstandings among stakeholders about the impact of the collaboration between the Small Business Administration and the Department of Agriculture.
The requirement in Section 2 for a detailed report on the MOU with findings from specific clauses, without elaborating on those findings within the section, could lead to omissions or lack of accountability in reporting and understanding the collaboration's outcomes.
The section header in Section 1 provides only a short title without context or detailed information, making it challenging for stakeholders to understand the implications or importance of the bill.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act specifies its short title, which is the “Small Business Administration Rural Performance Report Act.”
2. Small business rural performance reports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The new amendments to the Small Business Act require the Office of Rural Affairs to publish an initial report online and submit it to specific Congressional committees, detailing their activities, outreach events, and partnerships in the prior year. This report, along with an annual report, aims to provide transparency about their efforts, including their collaboration with the Department of Agriculture and change references from the "United States Tourism and Travel Administration" to the "National Travel and Tourism Office of the Department of Commerce."
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this part of the Act, several terms are defined: "Administrator" is the head of the Small Business Administration, "Administration" refers to the Small Business Administration itself, and "MOU" is the memorandum of understanding between the Department of Agriculture and the Small Business Administration established on April 4, 2018, to boost business and agricultural growth in rural areas.
4. Compliance with CUTGO Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that no new funds will be approved for implementing this Act or any changes it introduces, following the "CUTGO" rule, which requires that additions in the budget must be balanced by equal spending cuts elsewhere.